Questioning the sci-fi alibi: A critique of how 'science fiction fears' are used to explain away public concerns about risk

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-86

  Kitzinger, Jenny ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drama; Fiction; Future; GM; Nanotechnology; Stem cell research

Indexed keywords

EMERGING SCIENCE; FICTION; NEWS REPORTING; POLICY MAKERS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC CONCERN; PUBLIC DEBATE; SCIENCE FICTIONS; STEM CELL RESEARCH;

NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH;

STEM CELLS;

EID: 77249115323     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870903136068     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Anderson, A. 2002. In search of the Holy Grail: Media discourse and the new human genetics. New Genetics and Society 21, no.3: 327-337
2. Anderson, A., S. Allan, A. Petersen, and C. Wilkinson. 2005. The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Science Communication 27, no.2: 200-220
3. Anderson, A., A. Petersen, and S. Allan. 2005. Science fiction/science fact? Metaphor and imagery in news stories on medical genetics. New Genetics and Society 24, no.3: 337-353
4. Bainbridge, W. 1983. The space flight revolution: A sociological study. Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
5. Barker, M., and J. Petley, eds. 2001. Ill effects: The media/violence. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
6. Berne, R. 2007. Science fiction: A portal to the ethics of nanotechnology. In Nanoethics: Examining the societal impact of nanotechnology, ed. P. Lin, F. Allhoff, J. Moor, and J. Weckert, 10-17. New York: Wiley.
7. BMA (British Medical Association). 1999. Human 'cloning': A discussion paper for the World Medical Association. www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/content/ humancloning (accessed June 2, 2008).
8. Cobb, M., and J. Macoubrie. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6, no.4: 395-405.
9. Cook, G. 2004. Genetically modified language: The discourse of the GM debate. London: Routledge.
10. Coyle, F., C. Chekar, and J. Kitzinger. 2008. Comparative analyses of 'public discourse' and 'discourses about the public' in relation to stem cell research. Summary report. Cesagen, CBAR initiative, Cardiff University. http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/ cesagen/publications/
11. Gerbner, G. 1987. Science on television: How it affects public conceptions. Issues in Science and Technology 3, no.3: 109-115
12. Gieryn, T.F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Haran, J. 2007. Public consultation has been hijacked. Paper presented at Cesagen day workshop: Feminist Issues in Contemporary Biopolitics - a Cesagen dissemination seminar series, 'Getting beyond the usual suspects', September 14, in Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
14. Haran, J., and J. Kitzinger. 2009. Modest witness. Public Understanding of Science.
15. Haran, J., J. Kitzinger, M. McNeil, and K. O'Riordan. 2008. Human cloning in the media: From science fiction to science practice. London: Routledge.
16. Hessenbruch, A. 2005. Beyond truth: Pleasure of nanofutures. Techné 8, no.3: 34-59.
17. Holliman, R. 2004. Media coverage of cloning. Public Understanding of Science 13, no.2: 107-130
18. Hughes, E., and J. Kitzinger. 2008. Science fiction fears? An analysis of how people use fiction in discussing risk and emerging science and technology (SCARR Working Paper No. 28). http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/resources/ SciFiFearsWP28.pdf (accessed June 1, 2009).
19. Hughes, E., J. Kitzinger, and G. Murdock. 2008. Media discourse and framing of risk. (SCARR Working Paper No. 27). http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/ resources/ KitzingerWkPaper27.pdf (accessed June 1, 2009).
20. Huxford, J. 2000. Framing the future: Science fiction frames and the press coverage of cloning. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 14, no.2: 187-199
21. Jensen, E. 2008. The Dao of human cloning: Utopian/dystopian hype in the British press and popular films. Public Understanding of Science 17, no.2: 123-143
22. Keller, K. 2007. Nanotechnology and society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9: 5-10.
23. Kirby, D. 2000. The new eugenics in cinema: Genetic determinism and gene therapy in GATTACA. Science Fiction Studies 27, no.2: 1-18.
24. ---. 2002. Are we not men? The horror of eugenics in 'The Island of Dr. Moreau'. Paradoxa 17: 93-108.
25. 2003. Science advisors, representation, and Hollywood films. Molecular Interventions 3,no. 2: 54-59
26. ---. 2008. Cinematic science. In Handbook of public communication of science and technology, ed. B. Trench and M. Bucchi, 67-94. New York: Routledge.
27. Kirby D., and L. Gaither. 2005. Genetic coming of age: Genomics, enhancement, and identity in film. New Literary History 36, no.2: 263-282
28. Kitzinger, J. 2004. Audience and readership research. In The sage handbook of media studies, ed. J. Downing, D. McQuail, P. Schlesinger, and E. Wartella, 167-181 London: Sage.
29. Kitzinger, J., J. Haran, M. Chimba, and T. Boyce. 2008. Role models in the media: An exploration of the views and experiences of women in science, engineering and technology (Report prepared for the UKRC). Cardiff: Cardiff University School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/resources/Kitzinger-Report-1.pdf (accessed June 1, 2009).
30. Kitzinger, J., L. Henderson, and A. Smart. 2002. Media coverage of the ethical and social implications of human genetic research (Final report for The Wellcome Trust). London: Wellcome Trust. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/ resources/humangeneticresearch.pdf (accessed June 1, 2009).
31. Kitzinger, J., and C. Williams. 2005. Forecasting science futures: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the stem cell debate. Social Science and Medicine 6, no.3: 731-740
32. Macnaghten, P., M. Kearnes, and B. Wynne. 2005. Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication 27, no.2: 268-291
33. Michael, M., and S. Carter. 2001. The facts about fictions and vice versa: Public understandings of human genetics. Science as Culture 10, no.1: 5-32.
34. Mulkay, M. 1996. Frankenstein and the debate over embryo research. Science, Technology and Human Values 21, no.2: 157-176
35. Nerlich, B. 2008. Powered by imagination: Nanobots at the science photo library. Science as Culture 17, no.3: 269-292
36. Nerlich, B., D. Clarke, and R. Dingwall. 1999. The influence of popular cultural imagery on public attitudes towards cloning. Sociological Research Online 4, no.3: 1-14. www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/nerlich.html (accessed June 2, 2008).
37. Nerlich, B., R. Dingwall, and D. Clarke. 2002. The book of life: How the completion of the Human Genome Project was revealed to the public. Health 6, no.4: 445-469
38. Nerlich, B., R. Dingwall, and P. Martin. 2004. Genetic and genomic discourses at the dawn of the 21st century. Discourse and Society 15, no.4: 363-368
39. Nisbet, M., and R. Goidel. 2007. Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: Bridging the ethnographic-survey research divide. Public Understanding of Science 16, no.4: 421-440
40. Nottingham, S. 1999. Screening DNA: Exploring the cinema-genetics interface. http:// ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/stephen-nottingham/dna2.htm (accessed July 15, 2008).
41. O'Riordan, K. 2008. Human cloning in film: Horror, ambivalence and hope. Science as Culture 17, no.2: 1-18.
42. Petersen, A. 2001. Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print news. Social Science and Medicine 52, no.8: 1255-1268
43. Rose, C. 2003. How to teach biology using the movie science of cloning people, resurrecting the dead, and combining flies and humans. Public Understanding of Science 12, no.3: 289-296
44. Stacey, J. Forthcoming. The cinematic life of the gene. Raleigh: Duke University Press.
45. Stern, M. 2004. Jurassic Park and the moveable feast of science. Science as Culture 13, no.3: 347-372
46. Turney, J. 1998. Frankenstein's footsteps: Science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Van Dijck, J. 1998. Imagenation: Popular images of genetics. London: Macmillan.
48. Wellcome Trust. 1998. Public perspectives on human cloning. London: Wellcome Trust.
49. Wilmut, I., and R. Highfield. 2006. After Dolly: The use and misuse of human cloning. London: Little Brown.