Erratum: An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2015) 112:34 (10663-10668) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504124112);An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 34, 2015, Pages 10663-10668

  Hristov, Alexander N ^a   Oh, Joonpyo ^a   Giallongo, Fabio ^a   Frederick, Tyler W ^a   Harper, Michael T ^a   Weeks, Holley L ^a   Branco, Antonio F ^b   Moate, Peter J ^c   Deighton, Matthew H ^c   Williams, S Richard O ^c   Kindermann, Maik ^d   Duval, Stephane ^d  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

^c Ellinbank Centre   (Australia)

^d DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS LTD   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

3 nitrooxypropanol; Dairy cattle; Enteric methane; Hydrogen; Livestock

Indexed keywords

3 NITROOXYPROPANOL; ALKANE DERIVATIVE; LACTOSE; METHANE; MILK PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 3-NITROOXYPROPANOL; CARBON DIOXIDE; GAS; HYDROGEN; PROPANOL;

ADOPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DIGESTION; ENERGY; FERMENTATION; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INTAKE; HOLSTEIN CATTLE; LACTATION; LIVESTOCK; METHANOGENESIS; MILK PRODUCTION; MILK YIELD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUMINANT STOMACH; WEIGHT GAIN; ALFALFA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARCHAEON; BIOSYNTHESIS; BOVINE; CALORIC INTAKE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; GAS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MAIZE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; CARBON DIOXIDE; CATTLE; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; GASES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HYDROGEN; LACTATION; MEDICAGO SATIVA; METHANE; MILK; PROPANOLS; RUMEN; WEIGHT GAIN; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84940538726     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515515112     Document Type: Erratum

References (63)

1. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Working Group III-Mitigation of Climate Change. Chapter 11, Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
2. Opio C, et al. (2013) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains-A Global Life Cycle Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, Rome).
3. EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2012 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC).
4. FAOSTAT (2015) Statistical Database (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy).
5. Hristov AN, et al. (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production-A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. Gerber P, Henderson B, Makkar H, editors. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 177. FAO, Rome, Italy.
6. Hungate RE (1967) Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation. Arch Mikrobiol 59(1):158-164.
7. Wolin MJ (1979) The rumen fermentation: A model for microbial interactions in anaerobic ecosystems. Adv Microb Ecol 3:49-77.
8. McAllister TA, Newbold CJ (2008) Redirecting rumen methane to reduce methanogenesis. Aust J Exp Agric 48(2):7-13.
9. Knight T, et al. (2011) Chloroform decreases rumen methanogenesis and methanogen populations without altering rumen function in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167(special issue):101-112.
10. Hristov AN, Lee C, Hristova R, Huhtanen P, Firkins JL (2012) A meta-analysis of variability in continuous-culture ruminal fermentation and digestibility data. J Dairy Sci 95(9):5299-5307.
11. Soliva CR, Amelchanka SL, Duval SM, Kreuzer M (2011) Ruminal methane inhibition potential of various pure compounds in comparison with garlic oil as determined with a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 106(1):114-122.
12. Klevenhusen F, Zeitz JO, Duval S, Kreuzera M, Soliva CR (2011) Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167(special issue):356-363.
13. National Research Council (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Revised Edition (National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC).
14. Trei JE, Scott GC, Parish RC (1972) Influence of methane inhibition on energetic efficiency of lambs. J Anim Sci 34(3):510-515.
15. Duval S, Kindermann M (2012) Use of nitrooxy organic molecules in feed for reducing enteric methane emissions in ruminants, and/or to improve ruminant performance. World Intellectual Property Organization. International Patent Application WO 2012/084629 A1.
16. Ermler U, Grabarse W, Shima S, Goubeaud M, Thauer RK (1997) Crystal structure of methyl-coenzyme M reductase: The key enzyme of biological methane formation. Science 278(5342):1457-1462 10.1126/science.278.5342.1457.
17. Martínez-Fernández G, et al. (2014) Effects of ethyl-3-nitrooxy propionate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on ruminal fermentation, microbial abundance, and methane emissions in sheep. J Dairy Sci 97(6):3790-3799.
18. Romero-Perez A, et al. (2014) The potential of 3-nitrooxypropanol to lower enteric methane emissions from beef cattle. J Anim Sci 92(10):4682-4693.
19. Haisan J, et al. (2014) The effects of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emissions and productivity of Holstein cows in mid lactation. J Dairy Sci 97(5):3110-3119.
20. Reynolds CK, et al. (2014) Effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emission, digestion, and energy and nitrogen balance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 97(6): 3777-3789.
21. McIntosh FM, et al. (2003) Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(8):5011-5014.
22. Wecht KJ, Jacob DJ, Frankenberg C, Jiang Z, Blake DR (2014) Mapping of North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(12):7741-7756.
23. Miller SM, et al. (2013) Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(50):20018-20022.
24. Hristov AN, Johnson KA, Kebreab E (2014) Livestock methane emissions in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(14):E1320.
25. Johnson KA, Johnson De (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73(8): 2483-2492.
26. St-Pierre B, Wright A-DG (2013) Diversity of gut methanogens in herbivorous animals. Animal 7(Suppl 1):49-56.
27. Leahy SC, et al. (2010) The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLoS One 5(1):e8926.
28. Ragsdale SW (2009) Nickel-based enzyme systems. J Biol Chem 284(28):18571-18575.
29. Scheller S, Goenrich M, Mayr S, Thauer RK, Jaun B (2010) Intermediates in the catalytic cycle of methyl coenzymeM reductase: Isotope exchange is consistent with formation of a ?-alkane-nickel complex. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(44):8112-8115.
30. Chen S-L, Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM (2014) An investigation of possible competing mechanisms for Ni-containing methyl-coenzyme M reductase. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(27):14029-14035.
31. Holliger C, Pierik AJ, Reijerse EJ, Hagen WR (1993) A spectroelectrochemical study of factor F430 Ni(II/I) from methanogenic bacteria in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 115(13):5651-5656.
32. Romero-Perez A, et al. (2015) Sustained reduction in methane production from longterm addition of 3-nitrooxypropanol to a beef cattle diet. J Anim Sci 93(4):1780-1791.
33. Ungerfeld EM (2015) Shifts in metabolic hydrogen sinks in the methanogenesisinhibited ruminal fermentation: A meta-analysis. Front Microbiol 6:37.
34. Mitsumori M, et al. (2012) Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue. Br J Nutr 108(3):482-491.
35. Janssen PH (2010) Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Anim Feed Sci Technol 160(1-2):1-22.
36. Wang M, Sun XZ, Janssen PH, Tang SX, Tan ZL (2014) Responses of methane production and fermentation pathways to the increased dissolved hydrogen concentration generated by eight substrates in in vitro ruminal cultures. Anim Feed Sci Technol 194:1-11.
37. Trei JE, Parish RC, Singh YK (1971) Effect of methane inhibitors on rumen metabolism and feedlot performance of sheep. J Dairy Sci 54(4):536-540.
38. Matos LF, et al. (2015) Effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol on ruminal fermentation, methane and hydrogen emissions, and methane isotopic composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98(E-Suppl. 2):246.
39. Huhtanen P, Kaustell K, Jaakkola S (1994) The use of internal markers to predict total digestibility and duodenal flow of nutrients in cattle given six different diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48(3-4):211-227.
40. Lee C, Hristov AN (2013) Short communication: Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash and indigestible neutral detergent fiber as total-tract digestibility markers in dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets. J Dairy Sci 96(8):5295-5299.
41. Yan T, et al. (2010) Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 93(6): 2630-2638.
42. Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM (2014) Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J Dairy Sci 97(6):3231-3261.
43. Cottle DJ, Nolan JV, Wiedemann SG (2011) Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: A review. Anim Prod Sci 51(6):491-514.
44. Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2013) Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. J Dairy Sci 96(4):2476-2493.
45. Zimmerman P, Zimmerman S, Utsumi S, Beede D (2011) Development of a userfriendly online system to quantitatively measure metabolic gas fluxes from ruminants. J Dairy Sci 94(E-Suppl. 1):760.
46. Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ Sci Technol 28(2):359-362.
47. Deighton MH, et al. (2014) A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 197:47-63.
48. Sjaunja LO, Baevre L, Junkkarinen L, Pedersen J, Setälä J (1990) A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. In 27th Session of the International Commission for Breeding and Productivity of Milk Animals, Paris, France. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
49. Hristov AN, et al. (2013) Effect of Origanum vulgare L. leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 96(2): 1189-1202.
50. Lee C, et al. (2015) Effect of 2-hydroxy-4-methylthio-butanoic acid on ruminal fermentation, bacterial distribution, digestibility, and performance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98(2):1234-1247.
51. Hristov AN, et al. (2015) The use of an automated system to monitor enteric methane and carbon dioxide emissions from ruminant animals. J Vis Exp, in press.
52. Hammond KJ, et al. (2013) Methane emissions from growing dairy heifers estimated using an automated head chamber (GreenFeed) compared to respiration chambers or SF6 techniques. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):391.
53. Huhtanen P, Krizsan S, Cabezas Garcia EH, Hetta M, Gidlund H (2013) Repeatability and between cow variability of enteric CH4 and total CO2 emissions. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):588.
54. Oh J, et al. (2015) Comparison between the GreenFeed system and the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98(E-Suppl. 2):601.
55. Williams SRO, et al. (2011) Background matters with the SF6 tracer method for estimating enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: A critical evaluation of the SF6 procedure. Anim Feed Sci Technol 170(3-4):265-276.
56. Bauman DE, Griinari JM (2003) Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu Rev Nutr 23:203-227.
57. Hristov AN, et al. (2011) Effects of lauric and myristic acids on ruminal fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 94(1): 382-395.
58. Palmquist DL (2006) Milk fat: Origin of fatty acids and influence of nutritional factors thereon. Advanced Dairy Chemistry, Volume 2: Lipids, 3rd Edition, eds Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York), pp 43-92.
59. Dijkstra J, et al. (2011) Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167(special issue):590-595.
60. Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Deighton MH, Hannah MC, Wales WJ (2014) Methane emissions of dairy cows cannot be predicted by the concentrations of C8:0 and total C18 fatty acids in milk. Anim Prod Sci 54(10):1757-1761.
61. Van Lingen HJ, Crompton LA, Hendriks WH, Reynolds CK, Dijkstra J (2014) Metaanalysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 97(11):7115-7132.
62. Vlaeminck B, Fievez V, Cabrita ARJ, Fonseca AJM, Dewhurst RJ (2006) Factors affecting odd-and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 131(3-4):389-417.
63. Fievez V, Colman E, Castro-Montoya JM, Stefanov I, Vlaeminck B (2012) Milk odd-and branched-chain fatty acids as biomarkers of rumen function-An update. Anim Feed Sci Technol 172(1-2):51-65.