Effects of ethyl-3-nitrooxy propionate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on ruminal fermentation, microbial abundance, and methane emissions in sheep

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 3790-3799

  Martinez Fernandez G ^a   Abecia, L ^a   Arco, A ^a   Cantalapiedra Hijar, G ^a,c   Martin Garcia A I ^a   Molina Alcaide, E ^a   Kindermann, M ^b   Duval, S ^b   Yanez Ruiz D R ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS LTD   (Switzerland)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

3 nitrooxypropanol; Ethyl 3 nitrooxy propionate; Methane; Rumen; Sheep

Indexed keywords

3-NITROOXYPROPANOL; ETHYL-3-NITROOXY PROPIONATE; METHANE; PROPANOL; PROPIONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ALFALFA; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; AVENA; BIOSYNTHESIS; DIET; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; LACTATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; RUMINANT STOMACH; SHEEP; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; AVENA; DIET; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; LACTATION; MEDICAGO SATIVA; METHANE; MICROBIOTA; PROPANOLS; PROPIONATES; RUMEN; SHEEP;

EID: 84900988345     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7398     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abecia L., Martín-García A., Martínez G., Tomkins N., Newbold C., Yáñez-Ruiz D. Manipulation of the rumen microbial ecosystem to reduce methane emissions in ruminants through the intervention at early life stage of pre-ruminants and their mothers. Adv. Anim. Biosci 2011, 2:271.
2. Abecia L., Toral P., Martín-García A., Martínez G., Tomkins N., Molina-Alcaide E., Newbold C., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R. Effect of bromochloromethane on methane emission, rumen fermentation pattern, milk yield, and fatty acid profile in lactating dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci 2012, 95:2027-2036.
3. Aguilera J.F., Molina E., Prieto C., Boza J. Estimación de las necesidades energéticas de mantenimiento en ganado ovino de raza segureña. Arch. Zootec 1986, 35:89-96.
4. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis 2005, 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
5. 2 utilisation in the rumen. Anim. Prod. Sci 2008, 48:28-37.
6. Benchaar C., Greathead H. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 2011, 166-167:338-355.
7. Denman S.E., Tomkins N.W., McSweeney C.S. Quantification and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 2007, 62:313-322.
8. Duval, S., and M. Kindermann. 2012. Nitrooxy alkanoic acids and derivatives thereof in feed for reducing methane emission in ruminants, and/or to improve ruminant performance. S. Duval and M. Kindermann, assignees. US Pat. No. 20,120,315,339.
9. European Commission. 2007. Commission recommendations of 18 June 2007 on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Annex II to European Council Directive 86/609. The Commission of the European Communities Publishing, Brussels, Belgium.
10. Gargallo S., Calsamiglia S., Ferret A. Technical note: A modified three-step in vitro procedure to determine intestinal digestion of proteins. J. Anim. Sci 2006, 84:2163-2167.
11. Goel G., Makkar H.P.S., Becker K. Inhibition of methanogens by bromochloromethane: Effects on microbial communities and rumen fermentation using batch and continuous fermentations. Br. J. Nutr 2009, 101:1484-1492.
12. Halgren T.A., Murphy R.B., Friesner R.A., Beard H.S., Frye L.L., Pollard W.T., Banks J.L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem 2004, 47:1750-1759.
13. Hart K.J., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., Duval S.M., McEwan N.R., Newbold C.J. Plant extracts to manipulate rumen fermentation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 2008, 147:8-35.
14. Hristov A.N., Oh J., Firkins J.L., Dijkstra J., Kebreab E., Waghorn G., Makkar H.P., Adesogan A.T., Yang W., Lee C., Gerber P.J., Henderson B., Tricarico J.M. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J. Anim. Sci 2013, 91:5045-5069.
15. Hungate R.E. Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation. Arch. Mikrobiol 1967, 59:158-164.
16. Isac M.D., García M., Aguilera J., Molina A.E. A comparative study of nutrient digestibility, kinetics of digestion and passage and rumen fermentation pattern in goats and sheep offered medium quality forages at the maintenance level of feeding. Arch. Tierernahr 1994, 46:37-50.
17. Johnson K.A., Johnson D.E. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci 1995, 73:2483-2492.
18. Kang S.H., Evans P., Morrison M., McSweeney C. Identification of metabolically active proteobacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen by DNA- and RNA-derived 16S rRNA gene. J. Appl. Microbiol 2013, 115:644-653.
19. Kongmun P., Wanapat M., Pakdee P., Navanukraw C., Yu Z. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and ecology of swamp buffalo by coconut oil and garlic powder supplementation. Livest. Sci 2011, 135:84-92.
20. Liu H., Wang J., Wang A., Chen J. Chemical inhibitors of methanogenesis and putative applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2011, 89:1333-1340.
21. Maeda H., Fujimoto C., Haruki Y., Maeda T., Kokeguchi S., Petelin M., Arai H., Tanimoto I., Nishimura F., Takashiba S. Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitansPorphyromonas gingivalisPrevotella intermediatetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 2003, 39:81-86.
22. McAllister T., Newbold C.J. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust. J. Exp. Agric 2008, 48:7-13.
23. Menke K.H., Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev 1988, 28:7-55.
24. Mitsumori M., Shinkai T., Takenaka A., Enishi O., Higuchi K., Kobayashi Y., Nonaka I., Asanuma N., Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S. Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue. Br. J. Nutr 2012, 108:482-491.
25. Mohammed N., Ajisaka N., Lila Z., Hara K., Mikuni K., Hara K., Kanda S., Itabashi H. Effect of Japanese horseradish oil on methane production and ruminal fermentation in vitro and in steers. J. Anim. Sci 2004, 82:1839-1846.
26. Morgavi D.P., Forano E., Martin C., Newbold C.J. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 2010, 4:1024-1036.
27. Moss A.R., Jouany J.P., Newbold C.J. Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech 2000, 49:231-253.
28. Newbold C.J., López S., Nelson N., Ouda J., Wallace R., Moss A. Propionate precursors and other metabolic intermediates as possible alternative electron acceptors to methanogenesis in ruminal fermentation in vitro. Br. J. Nutr 2005, 94:27-35.
29. Prieto C., Aguilera J., Lara L., Fonollá J. Protein and energy requirements for maintenance of indigenous Granadina goats. Br. J. Nutr 1990, 63:155-163.
30. Boletin del Estado. Royal Decree No. 1201/2005 of 10 October on the Protection of Animals used for Experimentation and Other Scientific Purposes in Boletin del Estado 2005, 34367-34391. Spanish Government Publishing, Madrid, Spain.
31. Soliva C.R., Amelchanka S.L., Duval S.M., Kreuzer M. Ruminal methane inhibition potential of various pure compounds in comparison with garlic oil as determined with a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br. J. Nutr 2011, 106:114-122.
32. Soto E., Yáñez-Ruiz D., Cantalapiedra-Hijar G., Vivas A., Molina-Alcaide E. Changes in ruminal microbiota due to rumen content processing and incubation in single-flow continuous-culture fermenters. Anim. Prod. Sci 2012, 52:813-822.
33. Sylvester J.T., Karnati S.K., Yu Z., Morrison M., Firkins J.L. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J. Nutr 2004, 134:3378-3384.
34. Theodorou M.K., Williams B.A., Dhanoa M.S., McAllan A.B., France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 1994, 48:185-197.
35. Ungerfeld E.M., Rust S., Boone D., Liu Y. Effects of several inhibitors on pure cultures of ruminal methanogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97:520-526.
36. Van Nevel C.J., Demeyer D. Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ. Monit. Assess 1996, 42:73-97.
37. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci 1991, 74:3583-3597.
38. van Zijderveld S.M., Gerrits W.J., Apajalahti J.A., Newbold J.R., Dijkstra J., Leng R.A., Perdok H.B. Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep. J. Dairy Sci 2010, 93:5856-5866.
39. Weatherburn M.W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal. Chem 1967, 39:971-974.
40. Williams Y.J., Popovski S., Rea S.M., Skillman L.C., Toovey A.F., Northwood K.S., Wright A.D.G. A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2009, 75:1860-1866.
41. Wolin M., Miller T., Stewart C. Microbe-microbe interactions. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem 1997, 467-491. Springer, London, UK. P.N. Hobson, C. Stewart (Eds.).
42. Wood T.A., Wallace R.J., Rowe A., Price J., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., Murray P., Newbold C.J. Encapsulated fumaric acid as a feed ingredient to decrease ruminal methane emissions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 2009, 152:62-71.
43. Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., Moumen A., Garcia A.M., Alcaide E.M. Ruminal fermentation and degradation patterns, protozoa population, and urinary purine derivatives excretion in goats and wethers fed diets based on two-stage olive cake: Effect of PEG supply. J. Anim. Sci 2004, 82:2023-2032.
44. Zhou M., Hernandez-Sanabria E., Guan L.L. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2010, 76:3776-3786.