Interchange of entire communities: Microbial community coalescence

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 470-476

  Rillig, Matthias C ^a,b   Antonovics, Janis ^c   Caruso, Tancredi ^d   Lehmann, Anika ^a,b   Powell, Jeff R ^e   Veresoglou, Stavros D ^a,b   Verbruggen, Erik ^f  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b BERLIN BRANDENBURG INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BBIB   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^e WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Communities; Community coalescence; Environment; Global change; Metacommunity; Mixing; Networks

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COALESCENCE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; GLOBAL CHANGE; METAPOPULATION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; POPULATION MODELING;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; MICROFLORA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; MICROBIOTA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84940466996     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Wallace A.R. The Geographical Distribution of Animals. With a Study of the Relations of Living and Extinct Faunas as Elucidating the Past Changes of the Earth's Surface 1876, Harper and Brothers.
2. Gilpin M. Community-level competition - asymmetrical dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:3252-3254.
3. Wright C.K. Ecological community integration increases with added trophic complexity. Ecol. Complex. 2008, 5:140-145.
4. Leibold M.A., et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:601-613.
5. Bandelj V., et al. Fuzziness and heterogeneity of benthic metacommunities in a complex transitional system. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e52395.
6. Kraft N.J.B., et al. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29:592-599.
7. Tucker C.M., Fukami T. Environmental variability counteracts priority effects to facilitate species coexistence: evidence from nectar microbes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014, 281:20132637.
8. Livingston G., et al. The dynamics of community assembly under sudden mixing in experimental microcosms. Ecology 2013, 94:2898-2906.
9. Arenas A., et al. Synchronization in complex networks. Phys. Rep. 2008, 469:93-153.
10. Munoz M.A., et al. Griffiths phases on complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105:1-4.
11. Kramer M.A., et al. Coalescence and fragmentation of cortical networks during focal seizures. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:10076-10085.
12. Loreau M. Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:49-60.
13. Girvan M., Newman M.E.J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:7821-7826.
14. Krause A.E., et al. Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature 2003, 426:282-285.
15. Palla G., et al. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 2005, 435:814-818.
16. Pascual M., Dunne J.A. Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs 2006, Oxford University Press.
17. Fortunato S. Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 2010, 486:75-174.
18. James A., et al. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 2012, 487:227-230.
19. Pires M.M., Guimaraes P.R. Interaction intimacy organizes networks of antagonistic interactions in different ways. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10:20120649.
20. Thebault E., Fontaine C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 2010, 329:853-856.
21. Anderson M.J., et al. Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:19-28.
22. Pigot A.L., Etienne R.S. A new dynamic null model for phylogenetic community structure. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18:153-163.
23. Rosindell J., et al. The case for ecological neutral theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:203-208.
24. Maurer B.A., et al. Estimating metacommunity extent using data on species abundances, environmental variation, and phylogenetic relationships across geographic space. Ecol. Inform. 2013, 13:114-122.
25. Gotelli N.J. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 2000, 81:2606-2621.
26. Aguilar-Trigueros C.A., et al. Branching out: towards a trait-based understanding of fungal ecology. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2015, 29:34-41.
27. Aguilar-Trigueros C.A., et al. Ecological understanding of root-infecting fungi using trait-based approaches. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:432-438.
28. Krause S., et al. Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5:1-10.
29. Mkrtchyan H.V., et al. Could public restrooms be an environment for bacterial resistomes?. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e54223.
30. Lion S., van Baalen M. Self-structuring in spatial evolutionary ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:277-295.
31. Meadow J.F., et al. Bacterial communities on classroom surfaces vary with human contact. Microbiome 2014, 2:1-7.
32. Seedorf H., et al. Bacteria from diverse habitats colonize and compete in the mouse gut. Cell 2014, 159:253-266.
33. Shong J., et al. Towards synthetic microbial consortia for bioprocessing. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:798-802.
34. Hobbs R.J., et al. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:599-605.
35. Souffreau C., et al. An experimental analysis of species sorting and mass effects in freshwater bacterioplankton. Freshwat. Biol. 2014, 59:2081-2095.
36. Adams H.E., et al. Metacommunity dynamics of bacteria in an arctic lake: the impact of species sorting and mass effects on bacterial production and biogeography. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5:1-10.
37. Mummey D.L., et al. Neighboring plant influences on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition as assessed by T-RFLP analysis. Plant Soil 2005, 271:83-90.
38. Hausmann N.T., Hawkes C.V. Plant neighborhood control of arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition. New Phytol. 2009, 183:1188-1200.
39. Qin N., et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 2014, 513:59-64.
40. Kort R., et al. Shaping the oral microbiota through intimate kissing. Microbiome 2014, 2:41.
41. Bell T. Experimental tests of the bacterial distance-decay relationship. ISME J. 2010, 4:1357-1365.
42. Green J.L., et al. Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 2004, 432:747-750.
43. Hanson C.A., et al. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10:497-506.
44. Martiny J.B.H., et al. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4:102-112.
45. Baas Becking L.G.M. Geobiologie of Inleiding tot de Milieukunde 1934, W.P. van Stockum & Zoon.
46. Finlay B.J. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 2002, 296:1061-1063.
47. Ingold C.T. Fungal spores. Their Liberation and Dispersal 1971, Clarendon Press.
48. Young K.D. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70:660-703.
49. van der Gast C.J. Microbial biogeography: the end of the ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis?. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17:544-546.
50. Dickie I.A., et al. Do assembly history effects attenuate from species to ecosystem properties? A field test with wood-inhabiting fungi. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:133-141.