The case for ecological neutral theory

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 203-208

  Rosindell, James ^a,b,c   Hubbell, Stephen P ^d,e   He, Fangliang ^f,g   Harmon, Luke J ^b   Etienne, Rampal S ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^g SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^h UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; NUMERICAL MODEL; STOCHASTICITY; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRADE-OFF;

ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; REVIEW; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84858623494     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.004     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography 2001, Princeton University Press.
2. McGill B.J. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 2003, 422:881-885.
3. McGill B.J., et al. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 2006, 87:1411-1423.
4. Volkov I., et al. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 2003, 424:1035-1037.
5. Etienne R.S., Olff H. Confronting different models of community structure to species-abundance data: a Bayesian model comparison. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:493-504.
6. Leigh E.G. Neutral theory: a historical perspective. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:2075-2091.
7. Leigh E.G., et al. Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Scholarpedia 2010, 5:8822.
8. Rosindell J., et al. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:340-348.
9. Kopp M. Speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Bioessays 2010, 32:564-570.
10. Clark J.S. Beyond neutral science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:8-15.
11. Vellend M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 2010, 85:183-206.
12. McGill B.J., Nekola J.C. Mechanisms in macroecology: AWOL or purloined letter? Towards a pragmatic view of mechanism. Oikos 2010, 119:591-603.
13. Purves D.W., Turnbull L.A. Different but equal: the implausible assumption at the heart of neutral theory. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:1215-1225.
14. Ricklefs R.E. Applying a regional community concept to forest birds of eastern North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 108:2300-2305.
15. Dietrich M.R. The origins of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. J. Hist. Biol. 1994, 27:21-59.
16. Rosindell J., et al. Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:716-727.
17. Leigh E.G., et al. The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands - a test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evol. Ecol. 1993, 7:76-102.
18. Ricklefs R.E. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up?. Ecology 2006, 87:1424-1431.
19. Nee S. The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up?. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:173-176.
20. Wootton T.J. Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 2005, 433:309-312.
21. Dornelas M., et al. Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 2006, 440:80-82.
22. Levin S.A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 1992, 73:1943-1967.
23. McGill B.J., et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:995-1015.
24. Adler P.B., et al. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:95-104.
25. Magurran A.E. Species abundance distributions: pattern or process?. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:177-181.
26. Du X., et al. Negative density dependence can offset the effect of species competitive asymmetry: a niche-based mechanism for neutral-like patterns. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 278:127.
27. Etienne R.S., et al. Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Oikos 2007, 116:241-258.
28. Etienne R.S., Haegeman B. The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation. Theor. Ecol. 2011, 4:87-109.
29. MacArthur R.H. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1957, 43:293-295.
30. Cohen J.E. Alternative derivations of a species-abundance relation. Am. Nat. 1968, 102:165-172.
31. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography 1967, Princeton University Press.
32. Hubbell S.P. Neutral Theory and the Theory of Island Biogeography. The Theory of Island Biogeography Revisited 2009, 264-292. Princeton University Press. J. Losos, R.E. Ricklefs (Eds.).
33. Wennekes, P.L. et al. The neutral niche debate: a philosophical perspective. Acta Biotheor, doi:10.1007/s10441-012-9144-6.
34. Muneepeerakul R., et al. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi-Missouri basin. Nature 2008, 453:220-222.
35. Warren R.J., et al. Universal ecological patterns in college basketball communities. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17342.
36. Nekola J.C., Brown J.H. The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:188-196.
37. Levins R. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations 1968, Princeton University Press.
38. Friedman M. The Methodology of Positive Economics 1966, University of Chicago Press.
39. Nathan R., Muller-Landau H.C. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:278-285.
40. Siepielski A.M., et al. Experimental evidence for neutral community dynamics governing an insect assemblage. Ecology 2010, 91:847-857.
41. Allouche O., Kadmon R. A general framework for neutral models of community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1287-1297.
42. Chisholm R.A., Pacala S.W. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:15821-15825.
43. Etienne R.S., Haegeman B. Independent species in independent niches behave neutrally. Oikos 2011, 120:961-963.
44. Etienne R.S., et al. The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 248:522-536.
45. Clark J.S., et al. Resolving the biodiversity paradox. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:647-659.
46. Chave J., Leigh E.G. A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002, 62:152-168.
47. Chave J., et al. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:1-23.
48. Rosindell J., Cornell S.J. Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:586-595.
49. Rosindell J., Cornell S.J. Species-area curves, neutral models and long distance dispersal. Ecology 2009, 90:1743-1750.
50. Keil P., et al. Predictions of Taylor's power law, density dependence and pink noise from a neutrally modeled time series. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 265:78-86.
51. Gilbert B., et al. Can neutral theory predict the responses of Amazonian tree communities to forest fragmentation?. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:304-317.
52. Davies T.J., et al. Neutral biodiversity theory can explain the imbalance of phylogenetic trees but not the tempo of their diversification. Evolution 2011, 65:1841-1850.
53. Jabot F., Chave J. Inferring the parameters of the neutral theory of biodiversity using phylogenetic information and implications for tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:239-248.
54. Rosindell J., Phillimore A.B. A unified model of island biogeography sheds light on the zone of radiation. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:552-560.
55. Chase J.M. Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:182-186.
56. Gotelli N.J., McGill B.J. Null versus neutral models: what's the difference?. Ecography 2006, 29:793-800.
57. Lande R., et al. Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation 2003, Oxford University Press.
58. Tilman D., et al. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 1994, 371:65-66.
59. Lewis O.T. Climate change, species-area curves and the extinction crisis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2006, 361:163-171.
60. He F., Hubbell S.P. Species-area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 2011, 473:368-371.
61. Zhou S.R., Zhang D.Y. A nearly neutral model of biodiversity. Ecology 2008, 89:248-258.
62. Lin K., et al. Demographic trade-offs in a neutral model explain death-rate-abundance-rank relationship. Ecology 2009, 90:31-38.
63. He F., et al. Coexistence of nearly neutral species. J. Plant Ecol. 2012, 5:72-81.
64. Gravel D., et al. Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:39-409.
65. Leibold M.A., McPeek M.A. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 2006, 87:1399-1410.
66. Holt R.D. Emergent neutrality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:531-533.
67. Holyoak M., Loreau M. Reconciling empirical ecology with neutral community models. Ecology 2006, 87:1370-1377.
68. McInnes L., et al. Integrating ecology into macroevolutionary research. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7:644-646.
69. Ricklefs R.E. A comment on Hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift model. Oikos 2003, 100:185-192.
70. Allen A.P., Savage V.M. Setting the absolute tempo of biodiversity dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:637-646.
71. Etienne R.S. A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an 'exact' test of neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:608-618.
72. McGill B.J., et al. Community inertia of Quaternary small mammal assemblages in North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:16701-16706.
73. Pigolotti S., Cencini M. Speciation-rate dependence in species-area relationships. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 260:83-89.
74. Etienne R.S., Rosindell J. Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:204-213.