Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1819-1825

  Kinkel, Stefan ^a   Nadorf, Jan ^a   Thomsen, Marc N ^a,b   Heisel, Christian ^a,c   Jahnke, Alexander ^d   Kretzer, Jan P ^a   Jakubowitz, Eike ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Institute Springe   (Germany)

^c Orthopädie Kurpfalz ^*  (Germany)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Femoral defect; Fixation; Relative movements; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR METAPHYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TIME OF DEATH; TORQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TORQUE;

EID: 84940462405     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2869-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O, Herberts P (2012) Annual report 2011: Swedish hip arthroplasty register, Gothenburg, Sweden
2. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111–121
3. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55–62
4. Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2000) Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect 49:83–96
5. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK (1995) Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 319:130–140
6. D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:133–139
7. Plitz W (1989) Biomechanical aspects of loosening of hip prostheses. Orthopade 18:344–349
8. Te Stroet MA, Ghisai SA, Keurentjes JC, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, Van Kampen A, Schreurs BW (2015) Cemented total hip arthroplasty revisions in patients of eighty years and older. Int Orthop
9. Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH (2000) Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 49:131–139
10. Zeng M, Xie J, Li M, Lin S, Hu Y (2015) Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis. Int Orthop (in press)
11. Cameron HU (1994) The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:47–53
12. Head WC, Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2001) A titanium cementless calcar replacement prosthesis in revision surgery of the femur: 13-year experience. J Arthroplasty 16(Suppl 1):183–187
13. Higuera CA, Hanna G, Florjancik K, Allan DG, Robinson R, Barsoum WK (2006) The use of proximal fixed modular stems in revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(Suppl 1):112–116
14. Hoberg M, Konrads C, Engelien J, Oschmann D, Holder M, Walcher M, Rudert M (2015) Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop (in press)
15. Andress HJ, Kahl S, Kranz C, Gierer P, Schürmann M, Lob G (2000) Clinical and finite element analysis of a modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and stem component in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 14:546–553
16. Bischel OE, Böhm PM (2010) The use of a femoral revision stem in the treatment of primary or secondary bone tumours of the proximal femur: a prospective study of 31 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92:1435–1441
17. Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E (1977) Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11:811–838
18. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113
19. Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC (2004) The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:314–321
20. Jakubowitz E, Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2008) Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. J Biomech 41:3078–3084
21. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165
22. Görtz W, Nägerl UV, Nägerl H, Thomsen M (2002) Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124:706–713
23. Jakubowitz E, Kinkel S, Nadorf J, Heisel C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2011) The effect of multifilaments and monofilaments on cementless femoral revision hip components: an experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26:257–261
24. Kinkel S, Thomsen MN, Nadorf J, Heisel C, Tanner MC, Jakubowitz E (2014) Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis. Int Orthop 38:1147–1153
25. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 26:969–990
26. Herrera A, Panisello JJ, Ibarz E, Cegoñino J, Puértolas JA, Gracia L (2007) Long-term study of bone remodelling after femoral stem: a comparison between dexa and finite element simulation. J Biomech 40:3615–3625
27. Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP (2004) Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2720–2725
28. Philippe H, Nicolas D, Jerome D, Isaac G, Alexandre P, Jerome A, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2014) Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision. Int Orthop 39:639–644