Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1709-1713

  Hoberg, Maik ^a   Konrads, Christian ^a   Engelien, Jana ^a   Oschmann, Dorothee ^a   Holder, Michael ^a   Walcher, Matthias ^a   Rudert, Maximilian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cementless; Femoral stem exchange; Hip revision arthroplasty; Modular; MRP TITAN

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MERLE D AUBIGNE AND POSTER SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; JOINT DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940461340     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2009) Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:65–73. doi:10.1007/s00402-008-0617-7
2. Berry DJ (2002) Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplast 17:142–146
3. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC (2004) The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 142:314–321. doi:10.1055/s-2004-822795
4. Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC (2011) What can be done when hip prostheses fail?:new trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthopade 40:1084–1094. doi:10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0
5. Wirtz DC, Gravius S, Ascherl R, Forst R, Noeth U, Maus UM, Zeiler G, Moritz CD (2014) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem. Acta Orthop 85:562–569. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.958809
6. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC (2007) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:56–77. doi:10.1007/s00064-007-1195-5
7. Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res (193):133–140
8. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (295):172–178
9. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632
10. Wagner H, Wagner M (1993) Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 131:574–577. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1040074
11. Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1023–1031
12. Randhawa K, Hossain FS, Smith B, Mauffrey C, Lawrence T (2009) A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients. J Orthop Traumatol 10:159–165. doi:10.1007/s10195-009-0068-0
13. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2013) Behaviour of the ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stem in young and elderly patients. Int Orthop 37:2323–2330. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2044-9
14. Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:306–309. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0656-7
15. Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Deml MC, Ascherl R, Noth U, Forst R, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S (2013) Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-19
16. Gravius S, Mumme T, Andereya S, Maus U, Muller-Rath R, Wirtz DC (2007) The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement. Z Orthop Unfallchirurgie 145:157–160. doi:10.1055/s-2007-965182
17. Hernigou P, Queinnec S, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2013) One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper: from Stephen A. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:2081–2088. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1927-0
18. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138
19. Gutierrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V, Gil-Garay E (2007) Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 22:515–524. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.029
20. van Diemen MP, Colen S, Dalemans AA, Stuyck J, Mulier M (2013) Two-stage revision of an infected total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 136 patients. Hip Int 23:445–450. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000049