Long-term study of bone remodelling after femoral stem: A comparison between dexa and finite element simulation

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 40, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 3615-3625

  Herrera, Antonio ^a,b   Panisello, Juan J ^a,b   Ibarz, Elena ^a   Cegoñino, Jose ^a   Puértolas, Jósé A ^a   Gracia, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Finite element analysis; Hip replacement prosthesis

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; X RAY ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY;

BONE REMODELLING; HIP REPLACEMENT PROSTHESIS; STEM IMPLANTATION;

PROSTHETICS;

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE REMODELING; CADAVER; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GAMMA IRRADIATION; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 36249022074     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ABAQUS, 2006. Web site, 〈http://www.abaqus.com/〉.
2. Braun A., Papp J., and Reiter A. The periprosthetic bone remodelling process signs of vital bone reaction. International Orthopaedics 27 S1 (2003) 7-10
3. Brodner W., Bitzan P., Lomoschitz F., et al. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 86 (2004) 20-26
4. Bugbee W., Culpepper W., Engh A., and Engh C.A. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79 (1997) 1007-1012
5. Canales V., Panisello J.J., Herrera A., Peguero A., Martínez A., Herrero L., and García-Dihinx L. Ten year follow-up of an anatomical hydroxyapatite-coated total hip prosthesis. International Orthopaedics 30 (2006) 84-90
6. Capello W.N., D'Antonio J.A., Feinberg J.R., and Manley M.T. Hydroxiapatite-coated total hip femoral component in patients less that fifty years old: clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79A (1997) 1023-1029
7. Carrasco, J.L., Díaz, M., Honorato, J., Pérez, R., Rapado, A., Ruiz, I., 1992. Densidad mineral ósea en cuello femoral. In: Pharma Consult (Eds.). Proyecto Multicéntrico de Investigación en Osteoporosis. Estudio de la densidad ósea de la Población. Española. Madrid.
8. Cohen B., and Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 77 (1995) 479-483
9. D'Antonio J.A., Capello W.N., and Manley M.T. Remodeling of bone around hydroxiapatite-coated femoral stem. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78A (1996) 1226-1234
10. D'Antonio J.A., Capello W.N., Manley M.T., and Feimberg J.R. Hydroxiapatite coated implants: total hip arthroplasty in the young patients and patients with a vascular necrosis. Clinical Orthopaedics 344 (1997) 124-138
11. Domínguez-Hernández V.M., Carbajal M.F., Urriolagoitia G., Hernández L.H., Rico G., Damián-Noriega Z., and Lomelí-Mejía P.A. Biomecánica de un fémur sometido a carga. Desarrollo de un modelo tridimensional por medio del método del elemento finito. Revista Mexicana de Ortopaedica Traumatologie 13 6 (1999) 633-638
12. Domínguez-Hernández V.M., Ramos V.H., Feria C.V., Urriolagoitia G., and Hernández L.H. Efecto del espesor de la capa de cemento en el componente femoral de una prótesis de Charnley. Análisis biomecánico mediante el método del elemento finito. Revista Mexicana de Ortopaedica Traumatologie 14 6 (2000) 443-448
13. El Maraghy A.W., Schemitsch E.H., and Waddell J.P. Greater trochanter blood flow during total hip arthroplasty using a posterior approach. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 363 (1999) 151-157
14. Engh C.A., and Bobyn J.D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous-coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics 231 (1988) 7-28
15. Engh C.A., Bobyn J.D., and Glassman A.H. Porous-coated hip replacement factor governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 69 (1987) 45-55
16. Engh C.A., Massin P., and Suthers K.E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral component. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 257 (1990) 107-128
17. Engh Jr. C.A., Mc Auley J.P., Sychterz C.J., Sacco M.E., and Engh Sr. C.A. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82A (2000) 1414-1420
18. Engh C.A., McGovern T.F., and Schmidt L.L. Roetgenographic densitometry of bone adjacent to a femoral prosthesis. Clinical Orthopaedics 292 (1993) 177-190
19. Engh Jr. C.A., Young A.M., Engh Sr. C.A., and Hopper Jr. R.H. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 417 (2003) 157-163
20. Eskilen A., Remes V., Helenius I., Pulkkinen P., Nevalainen J., and Paavolainen P. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary ostearthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthopaedica 77 1 (2006) 57-70
21. Gibbons C., Davis A., Olearnik H., et al. Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of different design philosophy. International Orthopaedics 25 (2001) 89-92
22. Glassman A.H., and Bobyn J.D. New femoral designs do they influence stress-shielding{glottal stop}. Clinical Orthopaedics 453 (2006) 64-74
23. Gotze C., Tschgunow A., Gotze H.G., Bottner F., Potzl W., and Gosheger G. Long-term results of the metal-cancellous cementless Lubeck total hip arthroplasty: a critical review at 12.8 years. Arch Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Surgery 126 1 (2006) 28-35
24. Gutiérrez, P., Doménech, P., Roca, J., 2004. Biomecánica de la cadera. In: Patología de la cadera en el adulto. Editorial SECOT, Madrid, pp. 11-19.
25. Herrera A., Canales V., Anderson J., Garcia-Araujo C., Murcia-Mazon A., and Tonino A.J. Seven to ten years follow up of an anatomic hip prothesis. Clinical Orthopaedics 423 (2004) 129-137
26. Huiskes R., Weinans H., and Dalstra M. Adaptative bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 12 (1989) 1255-1267
27. Hupel T.M., Schemitsch E.H., Aksenov S.A., and Waddell J.P. Blood flow changes to the proximal femur during total hip arthroplasty. Canadian Journal of Surgery 43 (2000) 359-364
28. I-DEAS, 2006. Web site, 〈http://www.ugs.com/〉.
29. Kang J.S., Dorr L.D., and Wan Z. The effect of diaphyseal biologic fixation on clinical results and fixation of the APR-II stem. Journal of Arthroplasty 15 6 (2000) 730-735
30. Karachalios T., Tsatsaronis Ch., Efraimis G., et al. The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 469-475
31. Kärrholm J., Anderberg Ch., Snorrason F., et al. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 84 (2002) 1651-1658
32. Kawamura H., Dunbar M.J., Murray P., Bourne R.B., and Rorabeck C.H. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-years up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 83 (2001) 1333-1338
33. Kayabasi O., and Erzincanli F. Finite element modelling and analysis of a new cemented hip prosthesis. Advances in Engineering Software 37 (2006) 477-483
34. Kerner J., Huiskes R., van Lenthe G.H., Weinans H., van Rietbergen B., Engh C.A., and Amis A.A. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic BMD and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptative remodelling. Journal of Biomechanics 32 (1999) 695-703
35. Kröger H., Miettinen H., Arnala I., et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 11 (1996) 1526-1530
36. Kuiper J.H., and Huiskes R. The predictive value of stress shielding for quantification of adaptative bone resorption around hip replacement. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 119 3 (1997) 228-231
37. Lattanzi, R., Baruffaldi, F., Zannoni, C., Viceconti, M., 2004. Specialised CT scan protocols for 3-D pre-operative planning of total hip replacement.
38. Martini F., Lebherz C., Mayer F., Leichtle U., Kremling E., and Sell S. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density around hips with a custom-made femoral stem. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82-B (2000) 1065-1071
39. MatWeb (Material Property Data), 2006. Web site, 〈http://www.matweb.com/〉.
40. McAuley J., Sychterz Ch., and Ench C.A. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodelling. Clinical Orthopaedics 371 (2000) 146-153
41. McAuley J.P., Culpepper W.J., and Engh C.A. Total hip arthroplasty: concerns with extensively porous coated femoral components. Clinical Orthopaedics 355 (1998) 182-188 Med Eng Phys 26(3), 237-245
42. Nagi O.N., Kumar S., and Aggarwal S. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 72 1 (2006) 55-64
43. Nishii T., Sugano N., Masuhara K., et al. Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 339 (1997) 121-131
44. Nourissat, C., Adrey, J., Berteaux, D., Gueret, A., Goalard, C., Hamon, G., 1995. The ABG Standar hip prosthesis: five year results. In: Epinette, J.A., Geesink, R.G.T. (Eds.), Edit Expansion Cientifique Francaise. Hydroxiapatite Coated Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Paris, pp. 227-238.
45. Panisello, J.J., Herrero, L., Canales, V., Herrera, A., Martínez, A., Mateo, J., 2007. Long-term remodelling in proximal femur around a hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem. Ten years densitometric follow-up. Journal of Arthroplasty, accepted.
46. Rahmy A.I., Gosens T., Blake G.M., Tonino A., and Fogelman I. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow up study addressing the influence of prosthetic design and preoperative BMD on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporosis International 15 (2004) 281-289
47. Rho J.Y., Hobatho M.C., and Ashman R.B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Medical Engineering and Physics 17 5 (1995) 347-355
48. Rietbergen B., and Huiskes R. Load transfer and stress shielding of the hydroxyapatite ABG hip. A study of stem length and proximal fixation. Journal of Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 55-63
49. Rincón E., Ros A., Claramunt R., and Arranz F. Caracterización mecánica del material óseo. Tecnología y desarrollo 2 (2004)
50. Rubash H.E., Sinha R.K., Shanbhag A.S., and Kim S.Y. Pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. The Orthopaedic Clinics of North America 29 2 (1998) 173-186
51. Schmidt R., Nowak T., Mueller L., and Pitto R. Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. International Orthopaedics 28 (2004) 74-77
52. Senalp A.Z., Kayabasi O., and Kurtaran H. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviour of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Materials and Design 28 (2007) 1577-1583
53. Sinha R.K., Dungy D.S., and Yeon H.B. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 86A 6 (2004) 1254-1261
54. Smart R.C., Barbagallo S., Slater G., et al. Measurement of periprosthetic BMD in hip arthroplasty using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 445-452
55. Sychter C.J., Claus A.M., and Engh C.A. What we have learned about long-term cementless fixation from autopsy retrieval. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 405 (2002) 79-91
56. Sychter C.J., and Engh C.A. The influence of clinical factor on periprosthetic bone remodelling. Clinical Orthopaedics 322 (1996) 285-292
57. Tonino A., Rahmy A., et al. The hydroxyapatite ABG hip system. Journal of Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 274-282
58. Tonino A.J., Therin M., and Doyle C. Hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems: Histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at postmortem. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81B (1999) 148-154
59. Torrenegra C.A. Análisis estructural de endoprótesis para cadera, utilizando un modelo de elementos finitos. Umbral científico 4 (2004) 21-28
60. Turner A.W.L., Gillies R.M., Sekel R., Morris P., Bruce W., and Walsh W.R. Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 23 (2005) 705-712
61. Weinans H., Huiskes R., and Grootenboer H.J. Effects of fit and bonding characteristics of femoral stems on adaptative bone remodelling. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 116 4 (1994) 393-400
62. Wick M., and Lester D.K. Radiological changes in second and third generation Zweymuller stems. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 86 8 (2004) 1108-1114
63. Zeman, M.E., Cerrolaza, M., García-Aznar, J.M., Doblaré, M., 2001. Análisis comparativo F.E.M. 3D de la interacción entre el hueso femoral proximal y una prótesis de cadera utilizando un modelo de remodelación basado en mecánica del daño. V Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería Mecánica, Mérida, Venezuela, pp. 69-74.
64. Zerahn B., Storgaard M., Johansen T., et al. Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics 22 (1998) 225-229