Axis of travel: Modeling non-work destination choice with GPS data

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 58, Issue , 2015, Pages 208-223

  Huang, Arthur ^a   Levinson, David ^b  

^a TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

Axis of travel; Destination choice; GPS data; Land use; Non work trips

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAVEL TIME;

AXIS OF TRAVEL; CHOICE SET FORMATIONS; DESTINATION CHOICE; GPS DATA; LAND USE PLANNING; METROPOLITAN AREA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; WORK TRIPS;

LAND USE;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; GPS; LAND USE; METROPOLITAN AREA; MODELING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MINNEAPOLIS; MINNESOTA; SAINT PAUL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84940449367     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allison P. Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide 2010, SAS Institute Inc.
2. Arentze T.A., Oppewal H., Timmermans H.J. A multipurpose shopping trip model to assess retail agglomeration effects. J. Market. Res. 2005, 42:109-115.
3. Auld J., Mohammadian A. Planning-constrained destination choice in activity-based model. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2011, 2254:170-179.
4. Barros C., Butler R., Correia A. The length of stay of golf tourism: a survival analysis. Tourism Manage. 2010, 31:13-21.
5. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Bernardin V., Koppelman F., Boyce D. Enhanced destination choice models incorporating agglomeration related to trip chaining while controlling for spatial competition. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2009, 2132:143-151.
7. Bhat C. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1998, 32:361-371.
8. Bhat C., Guo J. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2004, 38:147-168.
9. Burke M., Brown A. Distances people walk for transport. Road Transport Res.: A J. Australian New Zealand Res. Pract. 2007, 16:16.
10. Carrion, C., 2013. Travel Time Perception Errors: Causes and Consequences. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.
11. Carrion C., Levinson D. A model of bridge choice across the Mississippi river in Minneapolis. Network Reliability in Practice 2012, vol. 4:115-129. Springer.
12. Casas, J., Arce, C., 1999. Trip reporting in household travel diaries: a comparison to gps-collected data. In: Proceedings of 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
13. Chen, J., 2013. Modeling route choice behavior using smartphone data. Ph.D. dissertation, Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne.
14. Cox D. The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failure. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1959, 21:411-421.
15. Cox D., Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data 1984, Chapman and Hall, London.
16. De Palma A., Dunkerley F., Proost S. Trip chaining: who wins who loses?. J. Econ. Manage. Strategy 2010, 19:223-258.
17. Draijer G., Kalfs N., Perdok J. Global positioning system as data collection method for travel research. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2000, 1719:147-153.
18. Fotheringham A.S. Modelling hierarchical destination choice. Environ. Plann. A 1986, 18:401-418.
19. Fotheringham A. Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Market. Sci. 1988, 7:299-310.
20. Handy S., Clifton K. Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practicalities. J. Transport. Stat. 2001, 4:67-78.
21. Hood J., Sall E., Charlton B. A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California. Transport. Lett.: Int. J. Transport. Res. 2011, 3:63-75.
22. Kitamura R. Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1984, 18:67-81.
23. Krizek, K., Iacono, M., El-Geneidy, A., Liao, C. Johns, R., 2009. Access to destinations: application of accessibility measures for non-auto travel modes. Access to Destinations Study Series Report: Mn/DOT 2009-24, University of Minnesota.
24. Leszczyc P., Sinha A., Timmermans H. Consumer store choice dynamics: an analysis of the competitive market structure for grocery stores. J. Retail. 2000, 76:323-345.
25. Levinson D., El-Geneidy A. The minimum circuity frontier and the journey to work. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2009, 39:732-738.
26. Li H., Guensler R., Ogle J., Wang J. Using global positioning system data to understand day-to-day dynamics of morning commute behavior. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2004, 1895:78-84.
27. Li H., Guensler R., Ogle J. Analysis of morning commute route choice patterns using global positioning system-based vehicle activity data. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2005, 1926:162-170.
28. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential choice. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models 1978, 75-96. North Holland, Amsterdam. A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, J. Weibull (Eds.).
29. Newman J., Bernardin V. Hierarchical ordering of nests in a joint mode and destination choice model. Transportation 2010, 37:677-688.
30. Parthasarathi P., Hochmair H., Levinson D. Network structure and spatial separation. Environ. Plann. Part B 2012, 39:137-154.
31. Pellegrini P., Fotheringham A., Lin G. An empirical evaluation of parameter sensitivity to choice set definition in shopping destination choice models. Papers Reg. Sci. 1997, 76:257-284.
32. Pozsgay M., Bhat C.R. Destination choice modeling for home-based recreational trips: analysis and implications for land use, transportation, and air quality planning. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2001, 1777:47-54.
33. Rashidi T., Auld J., Mohammadian A. A behavioral housing search model: two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46:1097-1107.
34. Recker W.W., Kostyniuk L.P. Factors influencing destination choice for the urban grocery shopping trip. Transportation 1978, 7:19-33.
35. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27:379-423. 623-656.
36. Timmermans H. A stated choice model of sequential mode and destination choice behaviour for shopping trips. Environ. Plann. A 1996, 28:173-184.
37. Wagner, D., 1997. Lexington area travel data collection test: GPS for personal travel surveys. Final Report, Office of Highway Policy Information and Office of Technology Applications, Federal Highway Administration, Battelle Transport Division, Columbus.
38. Wang L., Lo L. Immigrant grocery-shopping behavior: ethnic identity versus accessibility. Environ. Plann. A 2007, 39:684.
39. Wolf J., Oliveira M., Thompson M. Impact of underreporting on mileage and travel time estimates: results from global positioning system-enhanced household travel survey. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2003, 1854:189-198.
40. Wolf, J., Bachman, W., Oliveira, M., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A., Vovsha, P., Zmud, J., 2014. Applying GPS Data to Understand Travel Behavior: Guidelines, vol. 2. Vol. 775 of Report (National Cooperative Highway Research Program).
41. Xie F., Levinson D. Measuring the structure of road networks. Geogr. Anal. 2007, 39:336-356.
42. Zhang L., Levinson D. Determinants of route choice and the value of traveler information: a field experiment. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2008, 2086:81-92.
43. Zhu, S., 2010. The Roads Taken: Theory and Evidence on Route Choice in the Wake of the I-35 W Mississippi River Bridge. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.
44. Zolfaghari A., Sivakumar A., Polak J. Choice set pruning in residential location choice modelling: a comparison of sampling and choice set generation approaches in greater London. Transport. Plann. Technol. 2012, 35:87-106.