Hierarchical ordering of nests in a joint mode and destination choice model

Transportation

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 677-688

  Newman, Jeffrey P ^a   Bernardin Jr , Vincent L ^b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b Lochmueller and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand; Destination choice; Discrete choice models; Elasticity; Hierarchical nesting; Integrated models; Mode choice

Indexed keywords

CHOICE MODEL; DESTINATION CHOICE; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; INTEGRATED MODELS; MEDIUM SIZE; MODE CHOICE; MODELING SYSTEMS; PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS; URBAN AREAS;

ELASTICITY;

MASS TRANSPORTATION;

DEMAND ELASTICITY; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN AREA;

KNOXVILLE; TENNESSEE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953026321     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-010-9277-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abrahamsson, T., Lundqvist, L.: Formulation and estimation of combined network equilibrium models with applications to Stockholm. Transp. Sci. 33(1), 80-100 (1999).
2. Ben-Akiva, M.: Structure of passenger travel demand models. Transp. Res. Rec. 526, 26-42 (1974).
3. Bernardin, V. L.: A trip-based travel demand framework consistent with tours and stop interaction. Ph. D. Dissertation, Northwestern University (2008).
4. Bernardin, V. S., Koppelman, F. S., Boyce, D.: Enhanced destination choice models incorporating agglomeration related to trip chaining while controlling for spatial competition. Transp. Res. Rec. 2132, 143-151 (2009).
5. Bowman, J. L., Ben-Akiva, M. E.: Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp. Res. A 35(1), 1-28 (2001).
6. Boyce, D.: Is the Sequential Travel Forecasting Paradigm Counterproductive? J Urban Plan. Dev. 128(4), 169-183 (2002).
7. Bradley, M., Bowman, J. L.: A summary of design features of activity-based microsimulation models for US MPOs. In: Conference on innovations in travel demand modeling, Austin, TX, 2006.
8. Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transp. Res. E 45(1), 270-283 (2009).
9. ELM-Works LLC: ELM version 1.0, 2009.
10. Fotheringham, A. S.: Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models. Environ. Plan. A 15, 1121-1132 (1983).
11. Fotheringham, A. S.: Modelling hierarchical destination choice. Environ. Plan. A 18, 401-418 (1986).
12. Hensher, D. A.: Sequential and full information maximum likelihood estimation of a nested logit model. Rev. Econ. Stat. 68(4), 657-667 (1986).
13. Jonnalagadda, N., Freedman, J., Davidson, W. A., Hunt, J. D.: Development of microsimulation activity-based model for San Francisco: destination and mode choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1777, 25-35 (2001).
14. Kitamura, R., Kermanshah, M.: Sequential model of interdependent activity and destination choices. Transp. Res. Rec. 987, 81-89 (1984).
15. Koppelman, F. S., Wen, C.-H.: Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation. Transp. Res. B 32(5), 289-298 (1998).
16. Lerman, S. R.: Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model. Transp. Res. Rec. 610, 6-11 (1976).
17. Miller, E. J., Roorda, M. J., Carrasco, J. A.: A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32(4), 399-422 (2005).
18. Nerella, S., Bhat, C. R.: Numerical analysis of effect of sampling of alternatives in discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1894, 11-19 (2004).
19. NuStats: 2000 Knoxville urban area household travel behavior study. Final Report. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization, Knoxville, TN (2001).
20. NuStats: 2008 East Tennessee household travel survey. Final Report. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization, Knoxville, TN (2008).
21. Richards, M. G., Ben-Akiva, M. E.: A simultaneous destination and mode choice model for shopping trips. Transportation 3(4), 343-356 (1974).
22. Siegel, J. D., De Cea, J., Fernandez, J. E., Rodriguez, R. E., Boyce, D.: Comparisons of urban travel forecasts prepared with the sequential procedure and a combined model. Netw. Spat. Econ. 6(2), 135-148 (2006).
23. Vrtic, M., Axhausen, K. W.: The impact of tilting trains in Switzerland: a route choice model of regional- and long distance public transport trips. In: 82nd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC, 2008.
24. Yagi, S., Mohammadian, A. K.: Joint models of home-based tour mode and destination choices: applications to a developing country. Transp. Res. Rec. 2076, 29-40 (2008).