Planning-constrained destination choice in activity-based model: Agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2254, 2011, Pages 170-179

  Auld, Joshua ^a   Mohammadian, Abolfazl ^a  

^a University of Illinois   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PLANNING; ACTIVITYBASED MODELING (ABM); AGENT BASED; CHICAGO; CHOICE MODEL; DESTINATION CHOICE; DEVELOPED MODEL; ILLINOIS; MODEL AGENTS; TRAVEL SURVEYS;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84857859358     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2254-18     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Litwin, M., and E. J. Miller. Event-Driven Time-Series-Based Dynamic Model of Decision-Making Processes: Philosophical Background and Conceptual Framework. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
2. Miller, E. J. Propositions for Modelling Household Decision-Making. In Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations (M. Lee-Gosselin and S. T. Doherty, eds.), Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005, pp. 21-60.
3. Auld, J. A., and A. Mohammadian. Framework for the Development of the Agent-Based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) Model. Transportation Letters, International Journal of Transportation Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2009, pp. 245-255.
4. Burnett, K. P. Special Report No. 149: Disaggregate Behavioral Models of Travel Decisions Other Than Mode Choice: A Review and Contribution of Spatial Choice Theory. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 207-222.
5. Ansah, J. A. Destination Choice Set Definition and Travel Behaviour Modeling. Transportation Research, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 127-140.
6. Fotheringham, A. S. A New Set of Spatial Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 15, 1983, pp. 15-36.
7. Bernardin, V. L., Jr., F. Koppelman, and D. Boyce. Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related to Trip Chaining While Controlling for Spatial Competition. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2132, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 2009 pp. 143-151.
8. Schussler, N., and K. Axhausen. Accounting for Similarities in Destination Choice Modelling: A Concept. Presented at Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2009.
9. Bolduc, D., B. Fortin, and M.-A. Fournier. The Effect of Incentive Policies on the Practice Location of Doctors: A Multinomial Probit Analysis. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1996, pp. 703-732.
10. Sener, I. N., R. M. Pendyala, and C. R. Bhat. Accommodating Spatial Correlation Across Choice Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models: Application to Modeling Residential Location Choice Behavior. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
11. Arentze, T., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Robust Approach to Modeling Choice of Locations in Daily Activity Sequences. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 59-63. (Pubitemid 351190575)
12. Miller, H. Activities in Space and Time. In Handbook of Transport 5: Transport Geography and Spatial Systems (P. Stopher, K. Button, K. Haynes, and D. Hensher, eds.), Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2004.
13. Thill, J.-C., and J. L. Horowitz. Travel-Time Constraints on Destination-Choice Sets. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 29, 1997, pp. 108-123.
14. Zheng, J., and J. Y. Guo. Destination Choice Model Incorporating Choice Set Formation. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
15. Thill, J.-C. Choice Set Formation for Destination Choice Modeling. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 16, 1992, pp. 361-382. (Pubitemid 23368815)
16. Pagliara, F., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Choice Set Generation in Spatial Contexts: A Review. Transportation Letters, International Journal of Transportation Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2009, pp. 181-196.
17. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Household Travel and Activity Inventory. 2007. http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/TravelTracker Data.aspx. Accessed May 1, 2010.
18. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
19. Arentze, T., and H. Timmermans. ALBATROSS-A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies (EIRASS), Technical University of Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2000.
20. Kitamura, R., C. Chen, and R. M. Pendyala. Generation of Synthetic Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 154-162. (Pubitemid 127550712)
21. Hägerstrand, T. What About People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 24, 1970, pp. 7-21.
22. Frignani, M. Z., J. Auld, A. Mohammadian, C. Williams, and P. Nelson. Urban Travel Route and Activity Choice Survey: Internet-Based Prompted-Recall Activity Travel Survey Using Global Positioning System Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2183, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2010, pp. 19-28.
23. Auld, J. A., A. Mohammadian, and P. Nelson. Activity Planning Processes in the ADAPTS Activity-Based Modeling Framework. Proc., 12th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Jaipur, India, Dec. 13-18, 2009.
24. Li, M.-T., L.-F. Chow, F. Zhao, and S.-C. Li. Geographically Stratified Importance Sampling for the Calibration of Aggregated Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1935, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 85-92.
25. Daly, A. Estimating Choice Models Containing Attraction Variables. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1982, pp. 5-15. (Pubitemid 12509963)
26. Pozsgay, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. Destination Choice Modeling for Home-Based Recreational Trips: Analysis and Implications for Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1777, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 47-54. (Pubitemid 34262563)
27. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. 2001 Land Use Inventory, Version 2.1. 2010. http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/LandUseInventory Download.aspx. Accessed April 22, 2010.
28. Ben-Akiva, M., D. Bolduc, and J. Walker. Specification, Identification, and Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model. Working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.