Enhanced destination choice models incorporating agglomeration related to trip chaining while controlling for spatial competition

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2132, 2009, Pages 143-151

  Bernardin, Vincent L ^a   Koppelman, Frank ^b   Boyce, David ^b  

^a Lochmueller and Associates Inc   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION EFFECTS; CHOICE MODEL; COMMON KNOWLEDGE; COMPETITION EFFECTS; DESTINATION CHOICE; EFFECT MODEL; FUEL COST; GRAVITY MODELING; MODEL-FOLLOWING; SPATIAL COMPETITION;

AGGLOMERATION;

EID: 76149119730     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2132-16     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Special Report 288: Metropolitan Travel Forecasting, Current Practice and Future Direction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
2. Stewart, J. Q. An Inverse Distance Variation for Certain Social Distances. Science, Vol.93, 1941, pp. 89-90.
3. Stewart, J. Q. The Development of Social Physics. American Journal of Physics, Vol.18, 1950, pp. 239-253.
4. Stouffer, S. Intervening Opportunities: A Theory Relating Mobility and Distance. American Sociological Review, Vol.5, 1940, pp. 845-867.
5. Wilson, A. G. A Statistical Theory of Spatial Distribution Models. Transportation Research, Vol.1, 1967, pp. 253-269.
6. Wilson, A. G. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. Pion, London, 1970.
7. Erlander, S. Accessibility, Entropy and the Distribution and Assignment of Traffic. Transportation Research, Vol.2, 1977, pp. 149-153.
8. Erlander, S., and N. F. Stewart. The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis. VSP, Utrecht, Netherlands, 1990.
9. Luce, R. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959.
10. Marschak, J. Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators. In Stanford Symposium on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences (K. Arrow, ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif., 1960.
11. Ben-Akiva, M. E. Structure of Passenger Travel Demand Models. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1973.
12. Lerman, S. R. A Disaggregate Behavioral Model of Urban Mobility Decisions. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1976.
13. Koppelman, F. S., and J. R. Hauser. Destination Choice Behavior for Non-Grocery Shopping Trips. In Transportation Research Record 673, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 157-165.
14. Williams, H. C. L. On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit. Environment and Planning, Vol.9A, 1977, pp. 285-344.
15. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (A. Karlquist et al., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978, pp. 75-96.
16. Daly, A. Estimating Choice Models Containing Attraction Variables. Transportation Research B, Vol.16B, No.1, 1982, pp. 5-15.
17. Chow, L.-F., F. Zhao, M.-T. Li, and S.-C. Li. Development and Evaluation of Aggregate Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution in Florida. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1931, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 18-27.
18. Jonnalagadda, N., J. Freedman, W. A. Davidson, and J. D. Hunt. Development of Microsimulation Activity-Based Model for San Francisco: Destination and Mode Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1777, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 25-35.
19. Tobler, W. R. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, Vol.2, No.46, 1970, pp. 234-240.
20. Coe, N. M., P. F. Kelly, and H. W. C. Yeung. Economic Geography: A Contemporary Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Mass., 2007.
21. Shiftan, Y. Practical Approach to Model Trip Chaining. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 17-23.
22. Davidson, W., R. Donnelly, P. Vovsha, J. Freedman, S. Ruegg, J. Hicks, J. Castiglione, and R. Picado. Synthesis of First Practices and Operational Research Approaches in Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling. In Transportation Research A, Vol.41A, 2007, pp. 464-488.
23. Fotheringham, A. S. Some Theoretical Aspects of Destination Choice and Their Relevance to Production-Constrained Gravity Models. Environment and Planning, Vol.15A, 1983, pp. 1121-1132.
24. Fotheringham, A. S. Modeling Hierarchical Destination Choice. Environment and Planning, Vol.18A, 1986, pp. 401-418.
25. Fotheringham, A. S. Consumer Store Choice and Choice Set Definition. Marketing Science, Vol.7, 1988, pp. 299-310.
26. Fotheringham, A. S., and M. E. O'Kelly. Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1989.
27. Haynes, K. E., and A. S. Fotheringham. The Impact of Space on the Application of Discrete Choice Models. Review of Regional Studies, Vol.20, 1990, pp. 39-49.
28. Pellegrini, P. A., A. S. Fotheringham, and G. Lin. An Empirical Evaluation of Parameter Sensitivity to Choice Set Definition in Shopping Destination Choice Models. Papers in Regional Science, Vol.76, 1997, pp. 257-284.
29. Pellegrini, P. A., and A. S. Fotheringham. Intermetropolitan Migration and Hierarchical Destination Choice: A Disaggregate Analysis from the U.S. Public Use Microdata Samples. Environment and Planning, Vol.31A, 1999, pp. 1093-1118.
30. Pellegrini, P. A., and A. S. Fotheringham. Modelling Spatial Choice: A Review and Synthesis in a Migration Context. Progress in Human Geography, Vol.26, 2002, pp. 487-510.
31. Fotheringham, A. S., T. Nakaya, K. Yano, S. Openshaw, and Y. Ishikawa. Hierarchical Destination Choice and Spatial Interaction Modelling: A Simulation Experiment. Environment and Planning, Vol.33A, 2001, pp. 901-920.
32. Borgers, A., and H. Timmermans. Choice Model Specification, Substitution and Spatial Structure Effects: A Simulation Experiment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.17, 1987, pp. 29-47.
33. Kitamura, R. Incorporating Trip Chaining into Analysis of Destination Choice. Transportation Research B, Vol.18B, 1984, pp. 67-81.
34. Bhat, C. R., and J. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research B, Vol.38B, 2004, pp. 147-168.
35. Pozsgay, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. Destination Choice Modeling for Home-Based Recreational Trips: Analysis and Implications for Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1777, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 47-54.
36. Bhat, C., A. Govindarajan, and V. Pulugurta. Disaggregate Attraction- End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 60-68.
37. Knoxville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2000 Household Travel Behavior Survey. Final report. NuStats, Austin, Tex., 2001.
38. McFadden, D., K. Train, and W. B. Tye. An Application of Diagnostic Tests for the Independence from Irrelevant Alternatives Property of the Multinomial Logit Model. In Transportation Research Record 637, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 39-46.
39. Timmermans, H., A. Borgers, and P. Van Der Waerden. Mother Logit Analysis of Substitution Effects in Consumer Shopping Destination Choice. Journal of Business Research, Vol.23, 1991, pp. 311-323.
40. Cascetta, E., and A. Papola. Random Utility Models with Implicit Availability/Perception of Choice Alternatives for the Simulation of Travel Demand. Transportation Research C, Vol.9C, 2001, pp. 249-263.
41. Hansen, W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol.25, 1959, pp. 73-76.
42. Lieberson, S. Measuring Population Diversity. American Sociological Review, Vol.34, No.6, 1969, pp. 850-862.
43. Simpson, E. H. Measurement of Diversity. Nature, Vol.164, 1949, p. 688.
44. Horowitz, J. L. Statistical Comparison of Non-Nested Probabilistic Discrete Choice Models. Transportation Science, Vol.17, No.3, 1983, pp. 319-350.