Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly publishing

Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 37, Issue , 2015, Pages 329-350

  Kingsley, Danny A ^a,b   Kennan, Mary Anne ^c,d  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Article processing charges; Hybrid publishing; Institutional repositories; Megajournals; Open access; Predatory publishing; Scholarly publishing; Subscriptions

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SERVICES;

HYBRID PUBLISHING; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; MEGAJOURNALS; SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING; SUBSCRIPTIONS;

OPEN ACCESS;

EID: 84940367123     PISSN: 15293181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.03714     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Academia.edu. (n.d-a). About Academia.edu. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/about
2. Academia.edu. (n.d-b). Our mission. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/hiring/mission
3. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72-95
4. Andrew, T. (2012). Gold open access: Counting the costs. Ariadne. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/andrew
5. ANU Press. (2014). About. Retrieved from http://press.anu.edu.au/about/
6. AOASG. (2013). Developments in OA monograph publishing. Retrieved from http://aoasg.org.au/oamonographs-developments/
7. Association of Research Libraries. (2012). ISSUE BRIEF: 21st-century collections: Calibration of investment and collaborative action. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/issue-brief-21st-century-collections-2012.pdf
8. Australian Open Access Support Group. (2014). Statements on OA in Australia & the world. Retrieved from http://aoasg.org.au/statements-on-oa-in-australia-the-world/
9. Australian Research Council. (2013). ARC open access policy (version 2013.1). Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/applicants/open_access.htm
10. Bailey, C. (2014). Transforming peer review bibliography. Retrieved from http://digitalscholarship.org/tpr/tpr.htm
11. BASE. (n.d.). BASE Bielefeld academic search engine. Retrieved from http://www.base-search.net/
12. Beall, J. (2012). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. Retrieved from http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/30/criteria-for-determining-predatory-open-access-publishers-2ndedition/
13. Beall, J. (2013). Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learned Publishing, 26(2), 79-83
14. Beall, J. (2014a). Beall’s list: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. Retrieved from http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
15. Beall, J. (2014b). Hijacked journals. Retrieved from http://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/hijacked-journals/
16. Beaubien, S., & Eckard, M. (2014). Addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), eP1133
17. BioMed Central. (2014). What is “open peer review”, as operated by the medical journals in the BMC series? Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/authorfaq/medical
18. Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. J. (2014). Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges, Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlightissues/Open-access/Guides/WTP054773.htm
19. Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11273. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
20. Björk, B. C. (2012). The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1496-1504
21. Blackwell Publishing. (2005). Online open—a new open access journals service from Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/press/pressitem.asp?ref=272&site=1
22. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60-65.
23. Bonaccorso, E., Bozhankova, R., Cadena, C. D., Čapská, V., Czerniewicz, L., Emmett, A., Oludayo, F. F., Glukhova, N., Greenberg, M. L., & Hladnik, M. (2014). Bottlenecks in the open-access system: Voices from around the globe. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), eP1126.
24. Brody, T. (2007). Registry of open access repositories. Retrieved from http://roar.eprints.org/
25. Brook, M. (2014). The sheer scale of hybrid journal publishing. Retrieved from http://access.okfn.org/2014/03/24/scale-hybrid-journals-publishing/
26. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/
27. Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA, 280(3), 296-297
28. Business Innovation & Skills Committee. (2013). Business, Innovation and Skills Committee—fifth report: Open access, business, innovation & skills committee. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/businessinnovation-and-skills/news/on-publ-open-access/
29. California Digital Library. (2013). UC libraries discontinue Taylor & Francis systemwide journals license. Retrieved from http://www.cdlib.org/cdlinfo/2013/07/03/uc-libraries-discontinue-taylor-francissystemwide-journals-license/
30. Cambridge University Press. (2012). Open access content. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/openAccessContent?sessionId=0A1D632AE37ED813CEFFB02501DFA88D.journals
31. Canadian Research Knowledge Network. (2013). Université de Montréal takes bold turn, terminates participation in Wiley Online library license. Retrieved from http://crkn.ca/communications/universite-de-montreal-takes-bold-turn-terminates-participation-inwiley-online-library-license
32. COAR. (2014). COAR launches strategic initiative to align repository networks. Retrieved from https://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/coar-launches-strategic-initiative-to-align-repositorynetworks/
33. Committee for Economic Development. (2012). The future of taxpayer-funded research: Who will control access to the results? Retrieved from http://www.ced.org/reports/single/the-future-of-taxpayerfunded-research-who-will-control-access-to-the-resul
34. Corrall, S., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Coherence of open initiatives in higher education and research: Framing a policy agenda. iSchools. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/47316
35. Crawford, W. (2014). Ethics and access 2: The so-called sting. Cites & Insights, 14(5), 1-34. Retrieved from http://citesandinsights.info/civ14i5.pdf
36. Crotty, D. (2013). Getting open access embargoes right: Rational policy must be evidence-based. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/12/18/getting-open-access-embargoes-rightrational-policy-must-be-evidence-based/
37. Darley, R., Reynolds, J., & Wickham, C. (2014). Open access journals in humanities and social science. British Academy. Retrieved from http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/index.cfm
38. Davis, P. (2013). Journal usage half-life. Retrieved from http://www.publishers.org/_attachments/docs/journalusage halflife.pdf
39. Day, A., & Davis, H. (2012). Collection intelligence: Using data driven decision making in collection management. Charleston Conference. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context =charleston
40. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2014). Retrieved from http://doaj.org/
41. Drott, M. C. (2006). Open access. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 79-109.
42. Economist. (2013). Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab. The Economist, 409(27). Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correctingalarming-degree-it-not-trouble
43. Elsevier. (2012). Open access articles. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/about/openaccess/sponsored-articles
44. Elsevier. (2014). No double dipping policy. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/about/openaccess/open-access-policies/no-double-dipping-policy
45. Emery, J. (2013). Mining for gold: Identifying the librarians' toolkit for managing hybrid open access. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26(2), 115-119. Retrieved from http://uksg.metapress.com/content/v757245422x57833/fulltext.pdf
46. ePrints. (n.d.). ePrints. Retrieved from http://www.eprints.org/community/
47. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Rebout, L. & Roberge, G. (2013). Proportion of open access peer-reviewed papers at the European and world levels—2004-2011. Retrieved from http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Availability_2004-2011.pdf
48. European Commission. (2013). EU framework programme for research and innovation horizon 2020: Multi-beneficiary model grant agreement. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/ mga/gga/h2020-mga-gga-multi_en.pdf
49. Finch, J. (2012). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications: Report of the working group on expanding access to published research findings. Research Information Network: London. Retrieved from http://www.researchinfonet.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
50. Fruin, C., & Rascoe, F. (2014). Funding open access journal publishing: Article processing charges. College & Research Libraries News, 75, 240-243. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/75/5/240.full.pdf+html
51. Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2011). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/1/stiGargouri.pdf
52. Gibson, I. (2005). Overview of the House of Commons Science and Technology select committee inquiry into scientific publications. Serials, 18(1), 10-12
53. Ginsparg, P. (1996). Winners and losers in the global research village: Invited talk at electronic publishing in science. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ginsparg/physics/blurb/pg96unesco.html
54. Ginsparg, P. (1997). The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community. Portland Press. Retrieved from http://www.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch7.htm
55. Greaves, S., Scott, J., Clarke, M., Miller, L., Hannay, T., Thomas, A., & Campbell, P. (2006). Overview: Nature’s peer review trial. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html
56. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314
57. Harvard University. (2012). Faculty advisory council memorandum on journal pricing: Major periodical subscriptions cannot be sustained. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k77982&tabgroupid =icb.tabgroup143448
58. Houghton, J., Dugall, B., Bernius, S., Krönung, J., & König, W. (2012). General cost analysis for scholarly communication in Germany: Results of the “Houghton Report” for Germany. Frankfurt: Goethe University. Retrieved from http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/27530
59. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., & Sheehan, P. (2010). Economic and social returns on investment in open archiving of publicly funded research outputs: Report to SPARC. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved from http://www.sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/vufrpaa.pdf
60. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M., & Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: Exploring the costs and benefits. Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/economicpublishingmodelsfinalreport.aspx
61. Houghton, J., & Sheehan, P. (2006). The economic impact of enhanced access to research findings. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University. Retrieved from http://www.cfses.com/documents/wp23.pdf
62. Houghton, J., & Sheehan, P. (2009). Estimating the potential impacts of open access to research findings. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(1), 127-142. Retrieved from http://www.eapjournal.com/archive/v39_i1_10_-houghton.pdf
63. Houghton, J., Steele, C., & Sheehan, P. (2006a). Research communication costs in Australia: Emerging opportunities and benefits. Retrieved from http://vuir.vu.edu.au/4778/1/4778.pdf
64. Houghton, J., Steele, C., & Sheehan, P. (2006b). Research communication costs in Australia: Emerging opportunities and benefits: A report to the Department of Education, Science and Training. Melbourne, Victoria University, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/44485 (Current 16 April 2014).
65. Humaker, C. (2014). Taylor and Francis cancellations of library journals. Retrieved from http://listserv.crl.edu/wa.exe?A2=LIBLICENSE-L;ca4cf2de.1402
66. Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to rethink how to assess the quality of academic research? Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 11(5), 389-394.
67. Jisc. (2014). Jisc APC pilot project. Retrieved from http://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Jisc-APC-project/
68. Kennan, M. A. (2011). Learning to share: Mandates and open access. Library Management, 32(45), 302-318.
69. Kingsley, D. (2012). Build it and they will come? Support for open access in Australia. Scholarly and Research Communication, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/39/121
70. Kingsley, D. (2014). What are we spending on OA publication? Retrieved from http://aoasg.org.au/whatare-we-spending-on-oa-publication/
71. Kirkup, G. (2012) Will the Finch Report kill off non-commercial open access journals? Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/Kirkup/?p=559
72. Kling, R., & Callahan, E. (2003). Electronic journals, the Internet and scholarly communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 127-178.
73. Kling, R., McKim, G. W., & Kin, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as sociotechnical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47-67.
74. Kozak, M., & Hartley, J. (2013). Publication fees for open access journals: Different disciplines—different methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2591-2594.
75. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐ impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323-1329.
76. Mark Ware Consulting. (2010). Submission fees—a tool in the transition to open access?: Summary of report to knowledge exchange. Bristol: Mark Ware Consulting Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.knowledgeexchange.info/Files/Filer/downloads/Open%20Access/KE_Submission_fees_Short_Report_2010-11-25.pdf
77. Max Planck Institute. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the science and humanities. Retrieved from http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html
78. Meadows, A. (2013). Open access—keeping it real. Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/06/13/open-access-keeping-it-real/
79. Milloy, C. (n.d.). Innovative approaches to publishing open access monographs. Jisc Inform. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/inform/inform37/OpenAccessMonographs.html
80. Morrison, H. (2012). Publisher associations’ survey on subscriptions: Methodological critique. Retrieved from http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/2012/06/04/publisher-associations-survey-onsubscriptions-methodological-critique/
81. Nariani, R., & Fernandez, L. (2011). Open access publishing: What authors want. College and Research Libraries News, 73(2), 182-195. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/73/2/182.full.pdf+html
82. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2012). NHMRC open access policy. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/grants/policy/nhmrc-open-access-policy
83. National Information Standards Organization. (2008). Journal article versions (JAV) technical working group, Journal article versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV technical working group. Baltimore, MD: National Information Standards Organization. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/RP-8-2008.pdf
84. Nature. (2006). Editorial: Peer review and fraud. Nature, 444(21), 971-972. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7122/full/444971b.html
85. Nature. (2012). Open access option. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/ncomms/open_access/index.html
86. NCSU Libraries. (2014). 2014 collections review: Explanatory notes and factors to consider. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/collections/collectionsreview2014/factors
87. OAIster. (n.d.). OAIster find the pearls. Retrieved from http://oaister.worldcat.org/
88. Open Access Key. (2013). Open access key: Connecting the open access publishing community. Retrieved from https://www.openaccesskey.com/
89. Oxford Journals. (2013). Funder policies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/for_authors/repositories.html
90. Oxford University Press. (2012). Oxford open. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/oxfordopen/
91. Palgrave MacMillian. (2014). Palgrave Macmillan’s open peer review trial. Retrieved from http://palgraveopenreview.com/
92. Panitch, J. M., & Michalak, S. (2005). The serials crisis: A white paper for the UNC-Chapel Hill scholarly communications convocation. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/scholcomdig/whitepapers/panitchmichalak.html
93. Pinfield, S. (2013). Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis? Learned Publishing, 26(2), 85-88.
94. Poynder, R. (2004). No gain without pain. Information Today, 21(10), 1-5.
95. Poynder, R. (2012). The OA interviews: Audrey McCulloch, ALPSP Chief Executive. Retrieved from http://poynder.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/oa-interviews-audrey-mcculloch-alpsp.html
96. Poynder, R. (2013). Open Access: Springer tightens rules on self-archiving. Retrieved from http://poynder.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/open-access-springer-tightens-rules-on.html
97. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
98. Public Knowledge Project. (2013). Open journal systems. Retrieved from http://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/
99. Public Library of Science. (2011). History. Retrieved from http://www.plos.org/about/plos/history/
100. Public Library of Science. (2013). PLOS celebrates milestone. Retrieved from http://www.plos.org/ploscelebrates-milestone/
101. Public Library of Science. (2014a). PLOS journals. Retrieved from http://www.plos.org/publications/journals/
102. Public Library of Science. (2014b). PLOS publication charges. Retrieved from http://www.plos.org/publications/publication-fees/
103. Reller, T. (2013). A comment on takedown notices (with update). Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/connect/a-comment-on-takedown-notices
104. Research Councils UK. (2013). RCUK policy on open access. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/outputs/
105. ResearchGate. (2014). Open review. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publicliterature.OpenReviewInfo.html
106. ResearchGate. (n.d). About us. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/about
107. Rieger, O. Y. (2014). arXiv Update. Retrieved from https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/culpublic/arXiv+Update
108. Routledge. (2014). Taylor & Francis extend green open access zero embargo pilot scheme for Library & Information science authors until end 2014. Retrieved from http://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/news/press-release/taylor-francis-extend-green-openaccess-zero-embargo-pilot-scheme-lis#.U2nXfq2Syhk
109. Sage. (2012). Sage choice. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/sagechoice.sp
110. Sage Open. (n.d.). Sage open: About the title. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal202037/manuscriptSubmission#tabview=title
111. Smith, K. (2014). Half-lives, policies and embargoes. Retrieved from http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/15/half-lives-policies-and-embargoes/
112. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485-1495.
113. Springer. (2004). Springer open choice. Retrieved from http://www.lib.utk.edu/mt/weblogs/scholcomm/archives/000300.html
114. Springer. (2014). Springer open choice. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/springeropen-choice
115. Steele, C., Butler, L., & Kingsley, D. (2006). The Publishing imperative: The pervasive influence of publication metrics. Learned Publishing, 19(4), 277-290.
116. Stratford, M. (2012). “Predatory” online journals lure scholars who are eager to publish. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(27).
117. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Suber, P. (2014). The evidence fails to justify publishers’ demand for longer embargo periods on publiclyfunded research. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/01/14/suberembargoes-on-publicly-funded-research/
119. Swan, A. (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Southampton: University of Southampton. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/
120. Taylor and Francis. (2012). Taylor & Francis open select and Routledge open select. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/openselect
121. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7),1282-1293.
122. Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 426-429. Retrieved from http://mccabe.people.si.umich.edu/Nature_2013.pdf
123. Van Noorden, R. (2014a). Funders punish open-access dodgers. Nature, 508(7495). Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/funders-punish-open-access-dodgers-1.15007
124. Van Noorden, R. (2014b). Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763
125. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2008). Periodicals price survey 2008: Embracing openness. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6547086.html
126. Vardi, M. Y. (2012). Predatory scholarly publishing. Communications of the ACM, 55(7), 5-5.
127. Vergano, D. (2013). Glowing reviews on “arseniclife” spurred NASA's embrace. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/vergano/2013/02/01/arseniclife-peer-reviewsnasa/1883327/
128. Vincent, N. (2013). The monograph challenge. Debating open access. British Academy. Retrieved from http://issuu.com/thebritishacademy/docs/debating_open_access-vincent-the_mo
129. Ware, M. (2004). Universities' own electronic repositories yet to impact on open access. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/4.html
130. Ware, M. (2006). Open archives and their impact on journal cancellations. Learned Publishing, 19(3), 226-229. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alpsp/lp/2006/00000019/00000003/art00010
131. Wellcome Trust. (2003). Economic analysis of scientific research publishing: A report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtd003182.pdf
132. Wellcome Trust. (2004). Costs and business models in scientific research publishing: A report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtd003184.pdf
133. Wellcome Trust. (2013). Open access at the Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Open-access/index.htm
134. White, C. (2003). Little evidence for effectiveness of scientific peer review. British Medical Journal, 326(7383), 24.
135. Wiley Publishing. (2014). Wiley OnlineOpen. Retrieved from http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406241.html
136. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
137. Xia, J., & Nakanishi, K. (2012). Self-selection and the citation advantage of open access articles. Online Information Review, 36(1), 40-51.