Open access

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2006, Pages 79-109

  Drott, M Carl ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844445048     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440400110     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. (2004). What do societies do with their publishing surpluses? Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.alpsp.org/news/NFPsurvey-summaryofresults.pdf
2. Babbitt, D. (1997). Mathematical journals: Past present and future: A personal view. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 44(1), 29-32.
3. Bergstrom, T. (2002). A Lysistratian scheme. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/%7Etedb/JournalsAysistrata.html
4. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003, April 11). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
5. BioMed Central. (2004). (Mis)leading open access myths. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/inquiry/myths
6. Birman, J. (2000). Scientific publishing: A mathematician's viewpoint. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(1), 770-774.
7. Björk, B.-C. (2004). Open access to scientific publications: An analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research, 9(2). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html
8. Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2004). A formalised model of the scientific publication process. Online Information Review, 28(1), 8-21. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://oacs.shh.fi/publications/ Bjork&HedlundOIR2004.pdf
9. Borrull, A. L., & Oppenheim, C. (2004). Legal aspects of the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 483-548.
10. Boyce, P. B., & Dalterio, H. (1996). Electronic publishing of scientific journals. Physics Today, 49(42). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.aas.org/~pboyce/epubs/pt-art.htm
11. Buckholtz, A. (2001). Returning scientific publishing to scientists. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 7(1). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/buckholtz.html
12. Case, M. M. (2002). Capitalizing on competition: The economic underpinnings of SPARC. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/ sparc/core/index.asp?page=f41
13. Cox, J. (2003). Value for money in electronic journals: A survey of the early evidence and some preliminary conclusions. Serials Review, 29(2), 83-88.
14. Crow, R. (2002, August 27). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. Washington, DC: The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/ IR/ir.html
15. DeAngelis, C. D., & Musacchio, R. A. (2004). Access to JAMA. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(3), 370-371.
16. Digital Library Federation. (2003). Archiving electronic Journals. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.diglib.org/preserve/ejp.htm
17. Elliott, R. (1997, September). The impact of electronic publishing in the scientific information chain. Oxford, UK: International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.inasp.info/psi/ejp/elliot.html
18. Elsevier, Ltd. (2004). Author gateway for Elsevier journals. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://authors.elsevier.com
19. Entomological Society of America. (2004). Publish with ESA. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.entsoc.org/pubs/PUBLISH/index.html
20. Ewing, J. (2002). Predicting the future of scholarly publishing. Conference on Electronic Information and Communication, Tsinghau University, China, August 29-31, 2002. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.ams.org/ ewing/Documents/Predicting25.pdf
21. Fox, E. A., & Urs, S. R. (2002). Digital libraries. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 503-589.
22. Frazier, K. (2001). The librarian's dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the "Big Deal." D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html
23. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003, July). The RoMEO Project: Protecting metadata in an open access environment. Ariadne, 36. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue36/romeo
24. Galloway, P. (2004). Preservation of digital objects. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 549-590.
25. Ginsparg, P. (1996, February). Winners and losers in the global research village. Paper presented at a conference held at UNESCO Headquarters. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://arXiv.org/blurb/pg96unesco.html
26. Google. (2004). About Google Scholar. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://scholar.google.com/scholar/about.html#about
27. Graczynski, M. R., & Moses, L. (2004). Open access publishing: Panacea or Trojan horse? Medical Science Monitor, 10(1), ED1-ED3.
28. Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg's long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Proceedings of the 138th Annual Meeting of the Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/ 138/guedon.html
29. Guédon, J.-C. (2003). Open access archives: From scientific plutocracy to the republic of science. IFLA Journal, 29(2), 129-140.
30. Harnad, S. (1995). Universal FTP archives for esoteric science and scholarship: A subversive proposal. In: A. Okerson & J. O'Donnell (Eds.), Scholarly journals at the crossroads: A subversive proposal for electronic publishing. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/toc.html
31. Harnad, S. (1997, December). Learned inquiry and the Net: The role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright. Antiquity, 71(274), 1042-1048. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/ harnad97.antiquity.html
32. Harnad, S. (1999). Free at last: The future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5(12). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/december99/12harnad.html
33. Harnad, S. (2000). E-knowledge: Freeing the refereed journal corpus online. Computer Law & Security Report, 16(2), 78-87. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://cogprints.org/1701/00/harnad00.scinejm.htm
34. Harnad, S. (2001, May 18). Why I think research access, impact and assessment are linked. Times Higher Education Supplement, 16.
35. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314.
36. Held, M. J. (2003). Proposed legislation supports an untested publishing model. Journal of Cell Biology, 162(2), 171-172. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/162/2/171
37. Holmström, J. (2004). The cost per article reading of open access articles. D-Lib Magazine, 10(1). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january04/holmstrom/04holmstrom.html
38. Johnson, R. K. (2002). SPARC and ACRL working together to reform scholarly communication. College & Research Libraries News, 63(9), 648-651.
39. Kaiser, D. (2003). The politics of open access. Information Today, 20(11), 16.
40. Key Perspectives Ltd. (2004). JISC/OSI journal authors survey report. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ JISCOAreport1.pdf
41. King, D. W., & Montgomery, C. H. (2002). After migration to an electronic journal collection: Impact on faculty and doctoral students. D-Lib Magazine, 8(12). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ december02/king/12king.html
42. Kling, R. (2004). The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 591-631.
43. Knuth, D. E. (2003, October 27). Letter to the editorial board. Journal of Algorithms. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www-ca-faculty.stanford. edu/~Knuth/joalet.pdf
44. Lawrence, S. (2001a). Online or invisible? [preprint]. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.neci.nec.com/~lawrence/papers/online-nature01
45. Lawrence, S. (2001b, May 31). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521-522
46. Lund University Libraries. (2004). Directory of open access journals. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.doaj.org
47. McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: Analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Stamford, CT: Thomson Scientific. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.isinet.com/ media/presentrep/essayspdf/openaccesscitations2.pdf
48. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries. (2003). Wiley and Elsevier subscription packages. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://libraries.mit.edu/about/journals/packages.html
49. Montgomery, C. H., & King, D. W. (2002). Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections. D-Lib Magazine, 8(10). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/ montgomery/10montgomery.html
50. Morgan Stanley & Co. (2002). Scientific publishing: Knowledge is power. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.alpsp.org/MorgStan300902.pdf
51. Odlyzko, A. (1999). Competition and cooperation: Libraries and publishers in the transition to electronic scholarly journals. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(4). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.press.umich.edu/ jep
52. Odlyzko, A. (2003). The case against micropayments. In R. N. Wright (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Financial Cryptography (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No.2742, pp. 77-83). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/complete. html
53. Open Society Institute. (2002, February 14). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ read.shtml
54. Open Society Institute. (2003a). Guide to business planning for launching a new open access journal (2nd ed.). Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/oajguides/html/business_planning.htm
55. Open Society Institute. (2003b). Model business plan: A supplemental guide for open access journal developers & publishers. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/oajguides/html/ OAJGuideBPSuppl_Ed.1.htm
56. Open Society Institute. (2004). Guide to business planning for converting a subscription-based journal to open access (3rd ed.). Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/oajguides/html/business_converting. htm
57. Plutchak, T. S. (2004). Embracing open access. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(1), 1-3. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.pubmedcentral.gov
58. Public Knowledge. (2004). Public Knowledge home. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publicknowledge.org
59. Public Knowledge Project, (n.d.). Open journal systems. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://pkp.ubc.ca/ojs
60. Quint, B. (2004, February). The great divide. Searcher Magazine, 12(2). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/feb04/voice. shtm
61. Rowland, F. (1997). Print journals: Fit for the future? Ariadne, 7. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue7/fytton
62. Rowland, F. (2002). The peer review process. Learned Publishing, 15(4), 247-258.
63. San Francisco Chronicle. (2004, March 28). The staggering price of the world's best research, B1.
64. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2002). Gaining independence: A manual for planning the launch of a nonprofit electronic publishing venture. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/GI
65. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
66. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004a, November 1). Responses to the Committee's Tenth Report, Session 2003-04, Scientific publications: Free for all? Fourteenth Report of Session 2003-04. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/ cmselect/cmsctech/1200/120002.htm
67. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004b, July 7). Scientific publications: Free for all? Tenth Report of Session 2003-04. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm
68. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004c, March 1). Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence to be published as HC 399-iv. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/uc399-i/uc39902.htm
69. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004d, April 21). Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence to be published as HC 399-iv. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/uc399-iii/uc39902.htm
70. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004e, May 5). Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence to be published as HC 399-iv. Retrieved December 8, 2004, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/ cmsctech/uc399-iv/uc39902.htm
71. U.K. House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee. (2004f, July 7). Written evidence. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we01.htm
72. University of Michigan Library. (2004, March 10). U-M expands access to hidden electronic resources with OAIster. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2004/Mar04/r031004
73. University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries, (n.d.). Journal cost per use statistics University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries, 1998-1999. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.wisc.edu/wendt/journals/costben.html
74. University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries, (n.d.). More information about journal cost per use statistics University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.wisc.edu/wendt/journals/costben/ mcostben.html
75. U.S. National Institutes of Health. (2004, September 3). Notice: Enhanced public access to NIH research information (NOT-OD-04-064). Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-04-064.html
76. Walker, T. J. (2001, May 31). Authors willing to pay for instant Web access. Nature, 411(6837), 521-522.
77. Walker, T. J. (2003). Electronic publication of journals by the Entomological Society of America. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/epub/esaepub.htm
78. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics; or, Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.
79. Wellcome Trust. (2003). Economic analysis of scientific research publishing. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.wellcome.ac.Uk/en/1/ awtpubrepeas.html
80. Wellcome Trust. (2004). Costs and business models in scientific and research publishing. Retrieved December 8, 2004, from http://www.wellcome.ac.Uk/ en/1/awtpubrepcos.html