Using fee shifting to promote fair use and fair licensing

California Law Review

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 53-86

  Menell, Peter S ^a   Depoorter, Ben ^a,b  

^a Berkeley Center for Law and Technology University of California Berkeley School of Law ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940288431     PISSN: 00081221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Peter S. Menell, Intellectual Property: General Theories, in 2 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LAW & ECONOMICS 129 (Boudewijn Bouckaert & Gerrit De Geest eds., 2000)
2. Mark A. Lemley, Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property, 71 U. CHI. L. REV. 129, 131 (2004).
3. Peter S. Menell & Michael J. Meurer, Notice Failure and Notice Externalities, 5 J. LEGAL ANALYSIS 1, 4, 11-12, 21, 24-27 (2013).
4. WILLIAM M. LANDES & RICHARD A. POSNER, THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 22-24 (2003).
5. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives, 122 HARV. L. REV. 1569, 1578 (2009).
6. LAWRENCE LESSIG, REMIX: MAKING ART AND COMMERCE THRIVE IN THE HYBRID ECONOMY 51-83 (2008)
7. Anupam Chander & Madhavi Sunder, Everyone's a Superhero: A Cultural Theory of "Mary Sue" Fan Fiction as Fair Use, 95 CALIF. L. REV. 597, 598-601 (2007)
8. William W. Fisher III, The Implications for Law of User Innovation, 94 MINN. L. REV. 1417, 1418-30 (2010).
9. Peter S. Menell & Suzanne Scotchmer, Intellectual Property Law, in 2 HANDBOOK OF LAW & ECONOMICS 1473, 1499-1511 (A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell eds., 2007).
10. ROBERT P. MERGES ET AL., INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE NEW TECHNOLOGICAL AGE 550-51 (6th ed. 2012).
11. Pierre N. Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 HARV. L. REV. 1105, 1111 (1990) .
12. Barton Beebe, An Empirical Study of U.S. Copyright Fair Use Opinions, 1978-2005, 156 U. PA. L. REV. 549 (2008) .
13. Gideon Parchomovsky & Kevin A. Goldman, Fair Use Harbors, 93 VA. L. REV. 1483, 1528 (2007).
14. KEMBREW MCLEOD & PETER DICOLA, CREATIVE LICENSE: THE LAW AND CULTURE OF DIGITAL SAMPLING 27-28, 181 (2011) .
15. GIRL TALK, NIGHT RIPPER (Illegal Art 2006) and GIRL TALK, FEED THE ANIMALS (Illegal Art 2008)).
16. Joseph P. Liu, Two-Factor Fair Use?, 31 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 571, 574, 577-80, 580 n.51 (2008)
17. Michael W. Carroll, Fixing Fair Use, 85 N.C. L. REV. 1087, 1095 (2007) .
18. Darren Hudson Hick, Mystery and Misdirection: Some Problems of Fair Use and Users' Rights, 56 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 485, 497 (2009) .
19. David Nimmer, 'Fairest of Them All' and Other Fairy Tales of Fair Use, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 263, 263 (2003).
20. Pamela Samuelson, Unbundling Fair Uses, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 2537, 2541 (2009) .
21. Ben Depoorter, Technology and Uncertainty: The Shaping Effect on Copyright Law, 157 U. PA. L. REV. 1831 (2009).
22. MICHAEL C. DONALDSON, CLEARANCE AND COPYRIGHT 29, 363-67 (3d ed. 2008).
23. PATRICIA AUFDERHEIDE & PETER JASZI, UNTOLD STORIES: CREATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THE RIGHTS CLEARANCE CULTURE FOR DOCUMENTARY FILMMAKERS (2004) .
24. James Gibson, Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property Law, 116 YALE L.J. 882 (2007) .
25. Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, Distributive Values in Copyright, 83 TEX. L. REV. 1535 (2005) .
26. Nancy Ramsey, The Hidden Cost of Documentaries, N.Y. TIMES (Oct. 16, 2005), http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/movies/16rams.html (discussing the film Tarnation)
27. Robert Brauneis, Copyright and the World's Most Popular Song, 56 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 335 (2009).
28. Renee Graham, Jay-Z, the Beatles Meet in 'Grey' Area, BOS. GLOBE (Feb. 10, 2004), http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2004/02/10/jay-z- the-beatles-meet-in-grey-area/ ("[C]opies of 'The Grey Album' are available only as MP3 bootlegs on the Internet.").
29. Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, 83 TEX. L. REV. 1031 (2005)
30. Peter S. Menell, Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software, 39 STAN. L. REV. 1329 (1987).
31. Dotan Oliar, Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress's Intellectual Property Power, 94 GEO. L.J. 1771 (2006) .
32. Michael Abramowicz, An Industrial Organization Approach to Copyright Law, 46 WM. & MARY L. REV. 33 (2004) .
33. Robert P. Merges, Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations, 84 CALIF. L. REV. 1293 (1996) .
34. Christopher S. Yoo, Copyright and Product Differentiation, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 212 (2004) .
35. William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. LEGAL STUD. 325, 333 (1989) .
36. Mark A. Lemley, The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law, 75 TEX. L. REV. 989 (1997).
37. Paul Goldstein, Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright, 30 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 209 (1982).
38. R.H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J. L. & ECON. 1 (1960).
39. David S. Blessing, Note, Who Speaks Latin Anymore?: Translating De Minimis Use for Application to Music Copyright Infringement and Sampling, 45 WM & MARY L. REV. 2399, 2408-10 (2004).
40. Jeremy Scott Sykes, Copyright- The De Minimis Defense in Copyright Infringement Actions Involving Music Sampling, 36 U. MEM. L. REV. 749 (2006).
41. Lydia Pallas Lauren, Redefining the Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission Systems, 5 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 1, 4 (1997) .
42. Michael G. Anderson & Paul F. Brown, The Economics Behind Copyright Fair Use: A Principled and Predictable Body of Law, 24 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 143, 158 (1993).
43. Gideon Parchomovsky, Fair Use, Efficiency, and Corrective Justice, 3 LEGAL THEORY 347, 348 (1997) .
44. R. Polk Wagner, The Perfect Storm: Intellectual Property and Public Values, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 423, 426-27 (2005))
45. Claudia Eller, Warner Bros. and Fox Settle 'Watchmen' Copyright Dispute, L.A. TIMES, January 16, 2009, at 1 .
46. Jiarui Liu, Copyright Injunctions After Ebay: An Empirical Study, 16 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 215, 215 (2012) .
47. Pamela Samuelson & Tara Wheatland, Statutory Damages in Copyright Law: A Remedy in Need of Reform, 51 WM. & MARY L. REV. 439, 446-51 (2009).
48. David Nimmer, A Modest Proposal to Streamline Fair Use Determinations, 24 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 11, 12 (2006) .
49. David A. Simon, Teaching Without Infringement: A New Model for Educational Fair Use, 20 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 453, 527-50 (2010) .
50. Joshua O. Mausner, Copyright Orphan Works: A Multi-Pronged Solution to Solve a Harmful Market Inefficiency, 12 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 395, 398 (2007)
51. REGISTER OF COPYRIGHTS, REPORT ON ORPHAN WORKS 95-112 (2006), available at http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf (investigating problem of orphan works in copyright law).
52. Tom W. Bell, Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 76 N.C. L. REV. 557 (1998)
53. Alex Kozinski & Christopher Newman, What's so Fair about Fair Use?, 46 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 513 (1999).
54. Faculty, John Else: Professor and North Gate Chair in Journalism, UNIV. CAL. AT BERKELEY GRADUATE SCH. OF JOURNALISM, http://journalism.berkeley.edu/ faculty/else/.
55. Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1089, 1107 (1972) .
56. ALAN J. TOMKINS & THOMAS E. WILLGING, TAXATION OF ATTORNEYS' FEES: PRACTICES IN ENGLISH, ALASKAN, AND FEDERAL COURTS (1986).
57. Avery Katz, Measuring the Demand for Litigation: Is the English Rule Really Cheaper?, 3 J.L. ECON. & ORG. 143 (1987) .
58. AM. INTELL. PROP. LAW ASS'N, REPORT OF THE ECONOMIC SURVEY I-165 (2011).
59. Avery Wiener Katz, Indemnity of Legal Fees, in 5 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LAW & ECONOMICS 63 (Boudewijn Bouckaert & Gerrit De Geest eds., 2000) .
60. Ian Ayres & Eric Talley, Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement To Facilitate Coasean Trade, 104 YALE L.J. 1027 (1995) .
61. George L. Priest, Regulating the Content and Volume of Litigation: An Economic Analysis, 1 SUP. CT. ECON. REV. 163 (1982))
62. Geoffrey P. Miller, An Economic Analysis of Rule 68, 15 J. LEGAL STUD. 93, 95 (1986).
63. D. Rosenberg & S. Shavell, A Model in Which Suits Are Brought for Their Nuisance Value, 5 INT'L REV. OF LAW & ECON. 3 (1985).
64. George L. Priest, Regulating the Content and Volume of Litigation: An Economic Analysis, 1 SUP. CT. ECON. REV. 163 (1982).