Proteomic analysis of flooded soybean root exposed to aluminum oxide nanoparticles

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 128, Issue , 2015, Pages 280-297

  Mustafa, Ghazala ^a,b   Sakata, Katsumi ^c   Komatsu, Setsuko ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CROP SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c MAEBASHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aluminum oxide nanoparticles; Flooding stress; Proteomics; Root; Soybean

Indexed keywords

1,3 BETA GLUCANASE 1; ACTIN 11; ACTIN 7; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ALUMINUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE 5; BETA TUBULIN 6; BETA TUBULIN 8; CALNEXIN 1; COBALAMIN INDEPENDENT SYNTHASE FAMILY PROTEIN; DIHYDROLIPOAMIDE SUCCINYLTRANSFERASE; ENOYL COENZYME A HYDRATASE; FORMATE TETRAHYDROFOLATE LIGASE; GENERAL REGULATORY FACTOR 2; HEAT SHOCK COGNATE PROTEIN 70; LIPOXYGENASE 1; MESSENGER RNA; MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE 1; NADP MALIC ENZYME 3; NADP MALIC ENZYME 4; NANOPARTICLE; NUCLEOSIDE DIPHOSPHATE KINASE FAMILY PROTEIN; PEROXISOMAL 3 KETOACYL COA THIOLASE 3; S ADENOSYLMETHIONINE SYNTHETASE 2; SOYBEAN PROTEIN; SUCROSE SYNTHASE 4; THREONINE TRANSFER RNA LIGASE; TRIOSEPHOSPHATE ISOMERASE; UKARYOTIC TRANSLATION INITIATION FACTOR 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE GLUCOSE 1 PHOSPHATE URIDYLYLTRANSFERASE 2; METAL NANOPARTICLE; PLANT PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CELL DEATH; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; FLOODING; GENE EXPRESSION; GLYCOLYSIS; LIPID METABOLISM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE SEPARATION; PLANT CELL; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT METABOLISM; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SOYBEAN; UPREGULATION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

GLYCINE MAX;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; METAL NANOPARTICLES; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; PROTEOME; SOYBEANS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84940118190     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Nel A., Xia T., Mädler L., Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622-627.
2. Nowack B., Bucheli T.D. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150:5-22.
3. Brunner T.J., Wick P., Manser P., Spohn P., Grass R.N., Limbach L.K., Bruinink A., Stark W.J. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:4374-4381.
4. Owen R., Handy R. Formulating the problems for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:582-5588.
5. Novrotsky A. Energetics of nanoparticles oxides: interplay between surface energy and polymorphism. Genochem. Trans. 2003, 4:34-37.
6. Vernikov V.M., Arianova E.A., Gmoshinskii I.V., Khotimchenko S.A., Tutelian V.A. Nanotechnology in food production: advances and problems. Vopr. Pitan. 2009, 78:4-17.
7. Stadler T., Buteler M., Weaver D.K. Novel use of nanostructured alumina as an insecticide. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 66:577-579.
8. Dietz K.J., Herth S. Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:582-589.
9. Radziun E., Dudkiewicz Wilczyńska J., Ksiazek I., Nowak K., Anuszewska E.L., Kunicki A., Olszyna A., Zabkowski T. Assessment of the cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles on selected mammalian cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2011, 25:1694-1700.
10. Lee C.W., Mahendra S., Zodrow K., Li D., Tsai Y.C., Braam J., Alvarez P.J. Developmental phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29:669-675.
11. Lin D., Xing B. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 20:1-8.
12. Yang L., Watts D.J. Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicol. Lett. 2005, 158:122-132.
13. Burklew C.E., Ashlock J., Winfrey W.B., Zhang B. Effects of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on the growth, development, and microRNA expression of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e34783.
14. Riahi-Madvar A., Rezaee F., Jalili V. Effects of alumina nanoparticles on morphological properties and antioxidant system of Triticum aestivum. Iran J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 3:595-603.
15. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:7315-7320.
16. Nair P.M., Chung I.M. A mechanistic study on the toxic effect of copper oxide nanoparticles in soybean (Glycine max L.) root development and lignification of root cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 162:342-352.
17. Lu C.M., Zhang C.Y., Wen J.Q., Wu G.R., Tao M.X. Research of the effect of nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Sci. 2002, 21:168-172. (in Chinese).
18. Hashiguchi A., Ahsan N., Komatsu S. Proteomics application of crops in the context of climatic changes. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43:1803-1813.
19. Jackson M.B., Colmer T.D. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96:501-505.
20. Russel D.A., Wong D.M.L., Sachs M.M. The anaerobic response of soybean. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92:401-407.
21. Hashiguchi A., Sakata K., Komatsu S. Proteome analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings under flooding stress. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:2058-2069.
22. Huang S., Greenway H., Colmer T.D., Millar A.H. Protein synthesis by rice coleoptiles during prolonged anoxia: implications for glycolysis, growth and energy utilization. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96:661-668.
23. Komatsu S., Han C., Nanjo Y., Altaf-Un-Nahar M., Wang K., He D., Yang P. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of abscisic acid effect in early-stage soybean under flooding. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12:4769-4784.
24. Nanjo Y., Jang H.Y., Kim H.S., Hiraga S., Woo S.H., Komatsu S. Analyses of flooding tolerance of soybean varieties at emergence and varietal differences in their proteomes. Phytochemistry 2014, 106:25-36.
25. Mustafa G., Sakata K., Hossain Z., Komatsu S. Proteomic study on the effects of silver nanoparticles on soybean under flooding stress. J. Proteomics 2015, 122:100-118.
26. Stott P.A., Tett S.P.B., Jones G.S., Allen M.R., Ingram W.J., Mitchell J.F.B. Attribution of twentieth century temperature change to natural and anthropogenic causes. Clim. Dyn. 2010, 17:1-21.
27. Xiong L., Ishitani M., Zhu J.K. Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature, and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119:205-212.
28. Nanjo Y., Nakamura T., Komatsu S. Identification of indicator proteins associated with flooding injury in soybean seedlings using label-free quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12:4785-4798.
29. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
30. Olsen J.V., de Godoy L.M.F., Li G., Macek B., Mortensen P., Pesch R., Makarov A., Lange O., Horning S., Mann M. Parts per million mass accuracy on an orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:2010-2021.
31. Zhang Y., Wen Z., Washburn M.P., Florens L. Effect of dynamic exclusion duration on spectral count based quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:6317-6326.
32. Schmutz J., Cannon S.B., Schlueter J., Ma J., Mitros T., Nelson W., Hyten D.L., Song Q., Thelen J.J., Cheng J., Xu D., Hellsten U., May G.D., Yu Y., Sakurai T., Umezawa T., Bhattacharyya T.U., Sandhu D., Valliyodan B., Lindquist E., Peto M., Grant D., Shu S., Goodstein D., Barry K., Futrell-Griggs M., Abemathy B., Du J., Tian Z., Zhu L., Gill N., Joshi T., Libault M., Sethuraman A., Zhang X.C., Shinozaki K., Nguyen H.T., Wing R.A., Cregan P., Specht J., Grimwood J., Rokhsar D., Shoemaker R.C., Jackson S.A. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
33. Brosch M., Yu L., Hubbard T., Choudhary J. Accurate and sensitive peptide identification with mascot percolator. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:3176-3181.
34. Usadel B., Nagel A., Thimm O., Redestig H., Blaesing O.E., Palacios-Rofas N., Selbig J., Hannemann J., Piques M.C., Steinhauser D., Scheible W.R., Gibon Y., Morcuende R., Weicht D., Meyer S., Stitt M. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138:1195-1204.
35. Usadel B., Poree F., Nagel A., Lohse M., Czedik-Eysenberg A., Stitt M. A guide to using MapMan to visualize and compare Omics data in plants: a case study in the crop species, Maize. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:1211-1229.
36. Voit E.O. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Tanaka N., Mitsui S., Nobori H., Yanagi K., Komatsu S. Expression and function of proteins during development of the basal region in rice seedlings. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:796-808.
38. Baker C.J., Mock N.M. An improved method for monitoring cell death in cell suspension and leaf disc assays using Evans blue. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1994, 39:7-12.
39. Delisle G., Champoux M., Houde M. Characterization of oxalate oxidase and cell death in Al-sensitive and tolerant wheat roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42:324-333.
40. Fukao T., Bailey-Serres J. Plant responses to hypoxia-is survival a balancing act?. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9:449-456.
41. Nanjo Y., Maruyama K., Yasue H., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K., Komatsu S. Transcriptional responses to flooding stress in roots including hypocotyl of soybean seedlings. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77:129-144.
42. Gibbs J., Greenway H. Review: mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30:1-47.
43. Pedrazzini F.R., McKee K.L. Effect of flooding on activities of soil dehydrogenases and alcohol dehydrogenase in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1984, 30:359-366.
44. Sairam R.K., Dharmar K., Chinnusamy V., Meena R.C. Waterlogging-induced increase in sugar mobilization, fermentation, and related gene expression in the roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata). J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166:602-6016.
45. Komatsu S., Nanjo Y., Nishimura M. Proteomic analysis of flooding tolerance mechanism in mutant soybean. J. Proteomics 2013, 79:231-250.
46. Komatsu S., Deschamps T., Hiraga S., Kato M., Chiba M., Hashiguchi A., Tougou M., Shimamura S., Yasue H. Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77:309-322.
47. Nanjo Y., Skultety L., Ashraf Y., Komatsu S. Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:3989-4002.
48. Nanjo Y., Skultety L., Uváčková L., Klubicová K., Hajduch M., Komatsu S. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11:372-385.
49. Colmer T.D. Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:17-36.
50. Bailey-Serres J., Voesenek L.A.C.J. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:313-339.
51. Stammers D.K., Ren J., Leslie K., Nichols C.E., Lamb H.K., Cocklin S., Dodds A., Hawkins A.R. The structure of the negative transcriptional regulator NmrA reveals a structural superfamily which includes the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases. EMBO J. 2001, 20:6619-6626.
52. Andrianopoulos A., Kourambas S., Sharp J.A., Davis M.A., Hynes M.J. Characterization of the Aspergillus nidulans nmrA gene involved in nitrogen metabolite repression. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180:1973-1977.
53. Lamb H.K., Leslie K., Dodds A.L., Nutley M., Cooper A., Johnson C., Thompson P., Stammers D.K., Hawkins A.R. The negative transcriptional regulator NmrA discriminates between oxidized and reduced dinucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:32107-32114.
54. Nessler C.L., Allen R.D., Galewsky S. Identification and characterization of latex-specific proteins in opium poppy. Plant Physiol. 1985, 79:499-504.
55. Strömvik M.V., Sundararaman V.P., Vodkin L.O. A novel promoter from soybean that is active in a complex developmental pattern with and without its proximal 650 base pairs. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 412:217-231.
56. Radauer C., Lackner P., Breiteneder H. The Bet v 1 fold: an ancient, versatile scaffold for binding of large, hydroponic ligands. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:286.
57. Hashimoto M., Kisseleva L., Sawa S., Furukawa T., Komatsu S., Koshiba T. A novel rice PR10 protein, RSOsPR10, specifically induced in roots by biotic and abiotic stresses, possibly via the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45:550-559.
58. Ruperti B., Bonghi C., Ziliotto F., Pagni S., Rasori A., Varotto S., Tonutti P., Giovannoni J.J., Ramina A. Characterization of a major latex protein (MLP) gene down-regulated by ethylene during peach fruitlet abscission. Plant Sci. 2002, 163:265-272.
59. Chen J.Y., Dai X.F. Cloning and characterization of the Gossypium hirsutum major latex protein gene and functional analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2010, 231:861-873.
60. Tsukuda S., Gomi K., Yamamoto H., Akimitsu K. Characterization of cDNAs encoding two distinct miraculin-like proteins and stress-related modulation of the corresponding mRNAs in Citrus jambhiri lush. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60:125-136.
61. Domash V.I., Sharpio T.P., Zabreĭko S.A., Sosnovskaia T.F. Proteolytic enzymes and trypsin inhibitors of higher plants under stress conditions. Bioorg. Khim. 2008, 34:353-357. (in Russian).
62. Khan M.N., Sakata K., Hiraga S., Komatsu S. Quantitative proteomics reveals that peroxidases play key roles in post-flooding recovery in soybean roots. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13:5812-5828.
63. Joseph P., Jaiswal A.K. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 (DT diaphorase) specifically prevents the formation of benzo[a]pyrene quinone-DNA adducts generated by cytochrome P4501A1 and P450 reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:8413-8417.
64. Laskowski M.J., Dreher K.A., Gehring M.A., Abel S., Gensler A.L., Sussex I.M. FQR1, a novel primary auxin-response gene, encodes a flavin mononucleotide-binding quinone reductase. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128:578-590.
65. Schopfer P., Heyno E., Drepper F., Krieger-Liszkay A. Naphthoquinone-dependent generation of superoxide radicals by quinone reductase isolated from the plasma membrane of soybean. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:864-878.
66. Jiang Y., Yang B., Harris N.S., Deyholos M.K. Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:3591-3607.
67. Greenshields D.L., Liu G., Selvaraj G., Wei Y. Differential regulation of wheat quinone reductases in response to powdery mildew infection. Planta 2005, 222:867-875.
68. Heyno E., Alkan N., Fluhr R. A dual role for plant quinone reductases in host-fungus interaction. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 149:340-353.
69. Navrot N., Collin V., Gualberto J., Gelhaye E., Hirasawa M., Rey P., Knaff D.B., Issakidis E., Jacquot J.P., Rouhier N. Plant glutathione peroxidases are functional peroxiredoxins distributed in several subcellular compartments and regulated during biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:1364-1379.
70. Deller S., Macheroux P., Sollner S. Flavin-dependent quinone reductases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65:141-160.
71. Kong F.J., Oyanagi A., Komatsu S. Cell wall proteome of wheat roots under flooding stress using gel-based and LC MS/MS-based proteomics approaches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 2010:124-136.
72. Komatsu S., Kobayashi Y., Nishizawa K., Nanjo Y., Furukawa K. Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in soybean cell wall during flooding stress. Amino Acids 2010, 39:1435-1449.
73. Sampedro J., Cosgrove D.J. The expansin superfamily. Genome Biol. 2005, 6:242.
74. Poborilova Z., Opatrilova R., Babula P. Toxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles demonstrated using a BY-2 plant cell suspension culture model. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 91:1-11.
75. Mozafar A., Gamperle R., Loch J. Root aeration inhibits the recovery of soybean from flooding-induced chlorosis under non calcareous conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 1992, 15:1927-1937.
76. Barta A.L. Metabolic response of Medicago sativa L. and Lotus corniculatus L. roots to anoxia. Plant Cell Environ. 1986, 9:127-131.
77. Mitch W.E., Goldberg A.L. Mechanisms of muscle wasting: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 335:1897-1905.
78. Yanagawa Y., Komatsu S. Ubiquitin/proteasome mediated proteolysis is involved in the response to flooding stress in soybean roots, independent of oxygen limitation. Plant Sci. 2012, 185-186:250-258.
79. Vizcaíno J.A., Côté R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., Griss J., Alpi E., Birim M., Contell J., O'Kelly G., Schoenegger A., Ovelleiro D., Pérez-Riverol Y., Reisinger F., Ríos D., Wang R., Hermjakob H. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.