How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?

Scientometrics

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1553-1564

  Hu, Zhigang ^a   Chen, Chaomei ^a,b,c   Liu, Zeyuan ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic career age; Collaboration; Productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939895136     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1323-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Beaver, D. B. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration: part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics,1(2), 133–149.
2. Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics,1(3), 65–84.
3. Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,58(14), 2226–2239.
4. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics,58(1), 49–90.
5. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy,33(4), 599–616.
6. Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration,88(3), 627–648.
7. Costas, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,61(8), 1564–1581.
8. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy,36(10), 1620–1634.
9. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy,38(2), 293–305.
10. Dietz, J., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy,34(3), 349–367.
11. Ding, W. W., Levin, S. G., Stephan, P. E., & Winkler, A. E. (2010). The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science,56(9), 1439–1461.
12. Duque, R. B. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science,35(5), 755–785.
13. Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics,4(4), 540–553.
14. He, Z.-L., Geng, X.-S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy,38(2), 306–317.
15. Hsu, J., & Huang, D. (2010). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics,86(2), 317–324.
16. Jansen, D., Görtz, R., & Heidler, R. (2009). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics,83(1), 219–241.
17. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,26(1), 1–18.
18. Landry, R. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy,27(9), 901–913.
19. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science,35(5), 673–702.
20. Liang, L., Kreschmer, H., Guo, Y., & Beaver, D. deB. (2001). Age structures of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics, 52(3), 471–486.
21. Link, A. N., Paton, D., & Donald, S. S. (2002). An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. Research Policy,31(8–9), 1459–1466.
22. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change,18(6), 1033.
23. Porac, J. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy,33(4), 661–678.
24. Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review,40(3), 228–240.
25. Pravdi, N., & Olui -Vukovi, V. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. Scientometrics,10(5), 259–280.
26. Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2009). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics,84(2), 365–371.
27. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics,80(2), 419–439.
28. Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior,16(3), 282–298.
29. Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., Shibui, S., & Suzuki, T. (2008). An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks. Scientometrics,79(2), 435–449.
30. Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics,68(3), 643–655.