Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas

Scientometrics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 643-655

  Yoshikane, Fuyuki ^a,b   Nozawa, Takayuki ^b   Tsuji, Keita ^c  

^a National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation   (Japan)

^b National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation Tokyo   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746455575     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0113-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. ANDERSSON, A. E., PERSSON, O. (1993), Networking scientists. Annals of Regional Science, 27 (1) : 11-21.
2. ARUNACHALAM, S., SRINIVASAN, R., RAMAN, V. (1994), International collaboration in science: Participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30 (1) : 7-22.
3. BAHR, A. H., ZEMON, M. (2000), Collaborative authorship in the journal literature: Perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College & Research Libraries, 61 (5) : 410-419.
4. BARTLE, S. A., FINK, A. A., HAYES, B. C. (2000), Psychology of the scientist: LXXX. attitudes regarding authorship issues in psychological publications. Psychological Reports, 86 (3), Part 1 : 771-788.
5. BIRD, J. E. (1997), Authorship patterns in marine mammal science, 1985-1993. Scientometrics, 39 (1) : 99-105.
6. BONACICH, P. (1987), Power and centrality: A family of measures. The American Journal of Sociology, 92 (5): 1170-1182.
7. BORDONS, M., GÓMEZ, I. (2000), Collaboration networks in science. In: B. CRONIN, H. B. ATKINS (Eds), Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford: Information Today, pp. 197-213.
8. BRIDGWATER, C. A., BORNSTEIN, P. H., WALKENBACH, J. (1981), Ethical issues and the assignment of publication credit. American Psychologist, 36 (5) : 524-525.
9. BRIN, S., PAGE, L. (1998), The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. In: Proceedings of 7th International World Wide Web Conference. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 101-117.
10. CASON, J. A. (1992), Authorship trends in poultry science, 1981 through 1990. Poultry Science, 71 (8) : 1283-1291.
11. CRONIN, B., SHAW, D., BARRE, K. L. (2003), A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (9) : 855-871.
12. EGGHE, L., LIANG, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), The byline: Thoughts on the distribution of author ranks in multiauthored papers. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38 : 323-329.
13. GIBBONS, M., LIMOGES, C., NOWOTNY, H., SCHWARTZMAN, S., SCOTT, P., TROW, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Pub.
14. HOEN, W. P., WALVOORT, H. C., OVERBEKE, A. J. P. M. (1998), What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names?: A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). Journal of the American Medical Association, 280 (3): 217-218.
15. ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) (1997), Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 211 (11) : 927-934.
16. KLEINBERG, J. M. (1998), Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In: Proceedings of 9th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 668-677.
17. KRETSCHMER, H. (1994), Coauthorship networks of invisible-colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30 (1) : 363-369.
18. KRETSCHMER, H. (1997), Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 40 (3) : 579-591.
19. KRETSCHMER, H. (2004), Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60 (3) : 409-420.
20. MUÑOZ, W. P., MOORE, P. J. (1985), Multiple authorship. South African Medical Journal, 68 (6) : 368.
21. NARIN, F., STEVENS, K., WHITLOW, E. S. (1991), Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21 (3) : 313-323.
22. NIAD-UE (National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation, Japan) (Ed.). (2003), The Scheme for Implementation of Self-Evaluation: University-Wide Thematic Evaluation, International Cooperation and Exchange Activities (University Evaluations Begun in Fiscal Year 2002), rev. ed. Tokyo: NIAD-UE [in Japanese].
23. SACCO, W. P., MILANA, S. (1984), Increase in number of authors per article in 10 APA journals: 1960-1980. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 (1) : 77-83.
24. TESTA, J. (2004), The ISI database: The journal selection process. ISI Essay. Retrieved November 2, 2004 from: http://www.isinet.com/essays/ selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.html
25. YOSHIKANE, F., KAGEURA, K. (2004), Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks. Scientometrics, 60 (3) : 433-444.
26. ZOBEL, J. (1999), Guideline on Research Practice in Computer Science. Retrieved November 22, 2005 from: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~jz/conduct.html
27. ZUCKERMAN, H. A. (1968), Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74 (3) : 276-291.