Operationalizing a Shared Decision Making Model for Work Rehabilitation Programs: A Consensus Process

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 141-152

  Coutu, Marie France ^a,b   Légaré, France ^c   Durand, Marie José ^a,b   Corbière, Marc ^a,b   Stacey, Dawn ^d,e   Bainbridge, Lesley ^f   Labrecque, Marie Elise ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL CHARLES LEMOYNE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c Université Laval   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic pain; Consensus; Injuries; People with disabilities; Process theory; Rehabilitation; Shared decision making; Work

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONSENSUS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURIES; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; RETURN TO WORK; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION;

ADULT; CONSENSUS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; RETURN TO WORK;

EID: 84939884907     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: 15733688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9532-7     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Statistics Canada. Labour force characteristics, seasonally adjusted, by province (monthly). Government of Canada, Canada. 2014. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/lfss01c-eng.htm. Accessed April 2014.
2. Travail GM. In: Bonte P, Izard M, editors. Dictionnaire de l’ethnologie et de l’anthropologie (Dictionary of ethnology and anthropology). Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France; 2000. p. 717–20.
3. Leufstadius C, Eklund M, Erlandsson LK. Meaningfulness in work—experiences among employed individuals with persistent mental illness. Work. 2009;34(1):21–32. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0899.
4. Vézina M, Cloutier E, Stock S, Lippel K, Fortin É, Delisle A, et al. Enquête québécoise sur des conditions de travail d’emploi et de santé et de sécurité du travail (Quebec survey on working and employment conditions and occupational health and safety) (EQCOTESST). Montréal, Québec, Canada: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; 2011.
5. Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Jordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448–56. doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101571.
6. OECD. Sickness, Disability and work: breaking the Barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD; 2010.
7. Henderson M, Glozier N, Elliott KH. Long term sickness absence. BMJ. 2005;330:802–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7495.802.
8. Hlobil H, Staal JB, Spoelstra M, Ariens GA, Smid T, van Mechelen W. Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(4):249–57.
9. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. CLIB. 2006;4. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002194.
10. Schonstein E, Kenny DT. The value of functional and work place assessments in achieving a timely return to work for workers with back pain. Work. 2001;16(1):31–8.
11. Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.
12. Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand MJ, Champagne F, Stock S, et al. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of the Sherbrooke model of back pain management: a six-year follow-up study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:807–15.
13. Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Côté D, Cadieux G. Clinician-patient agreement about the work disability problem of patients having persistent pain: Why it matters. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):82–92. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9387-8.
14. Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, Rosenquist RW, Atlas SJ, Baisden J, et al. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain. Spine. 2009;34(10):1066–77. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a1390d.
15. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999;319(7212):780–2.
16. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–12. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010.
17. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71.
18. O’Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingsworth G, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33:267–79. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00026-3.
19. Légaré F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Saucier D, Côté L, Blais J, et al. Primary health care professionals’ views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa decision support framework in practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:380–90. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.011.
20. Parsons A, Harding G, Breen A, Foster N, Pincu T, Vogel S, et al. Will shared decision making between patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and physiotherapists, osteopaths and chiropractors improve patient care? Fam Pract. 2012;29(29):203–12. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmr083.
21. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. doi:10.1002/chp.47.
22. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Expressing and assessing program theory. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 7th ed. Sage Publications; 2004. p. 133–68.
23. Michie S, Fixsen DL, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009;4(40):1–6. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-40.
24. Chen HT. Issues in constructing program theory. New Dir Progr Eval. 1990;47:7–18. doi:10.1002/ev.1551.
25. Champagne F, Brousselle A, Hartz Z, Contandriopoulos AP. Modéliser les interventions (Modelling interventions). In: Brousselle A, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos A-P, Hartz Z, editors. L’évaluation: concepts et méthodes (Evaluation: concepts and methods). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 2009. p. 57–70.
26. Dubois CA, Champagne F, Bilodeau H. Historique de l’évaluation (History of evaluation). In: Brousselle A, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos A-P, Hartz Z, editors. L’évaluation: concepts et méthodes (Evaluation: concepts and methods). Montreal, Quebec: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 2009. p. 13–34.
27. Contandriopoulos AP, Champagne F, Denis JL, Avargues MC. L’évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes (Evaluation in the health field: concepts and methods). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2000;48(6):517–24.
28. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
29. Rossi PH, Freeman HE, Lipsey MW. Expressing and assessing program theory. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 6th ed. Beverly Hill: Sage; 1999. p. 155–88.
30. Gervais M, Pépin G, Carrière M. Triage ou comment adapter une technique de recherche à l’intervention clinique en ergothérapie (Triage or how to adapt a research technique to clinical intervention in occupational therapy). Revue Québécoise d’Ergothérapie. 2000;9:11–5.
31. Demers L, Poissant L. Connecting with clinicians: opportunities to strengthen rehabilitation research. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(2):152–9. doi:10.1080/09638280802037936.
32. Coutu MF, Légaré F, Durand MJ, Corbière M, Stacey D, Loisel P et al. Fostering shared decision making by occupational therapists and workers involved in accidents resulting in persistent musculoskeletal disorders: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6(22):1–8. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-22
33. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine. 1997;22(24):2911–8.
34. Geoffrion P. Le groupe de discussion (Group discussion). In: Gauthier B, editor. Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données (Social research: from the problem to data collection). 5th ed. Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2009. p. 391–414.
35. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Loisel P, Berthelette D. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work. 2003;21(3):233–42.
36. Corbière M, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Briand C, Goulet C, Charpentier N et al. Return to work obstacles and coping efficacy scale—musculoskeletal disorders (ROCES-MSD). 2009.
37. Albert V, Coutu MF, Durand MJ. Adaptation d’un questionnaire visant à mesurer les représentations liées à l’incapacité de travail (Adaptation of a questionnaire designed to measure representations related to work disability). L’Encéphale. 2013;39(3):174–82. doi:10.1016/j.encep.2012.05.002.
38. Albert V, Coutu MF, Durand MJ. Internal consistency and construct validity of the revised illness perception questionnaire adapted for work disability following a musculoskeletal disorder. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(7):557–65. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.702849.
39. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung W-Y, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–42. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x.
40. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Grol R. Shared decision making: measurement using the OPTION instrument. Wales, UK: Cardiff University; 2005.
41. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Jacobsen MJ. The Ottawa personal decision guide for people facing tough health or social decisions. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa; 2012.
42. Legare F, Stacey D, Pouliot S, Gauvin FP, Desroches S, Kryworuchko J, et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(1):18–25. doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.490502.
43. Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, Dumm S, Pluye P, Frosch D, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making: a mixed methods study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):554–64.
44. Stacey D, Légaré F, Pouliot S, Kryworuchko J, Dunn S. Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(2):164–72. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015.
45. St-Arnaud Y. L’interaction professionnelle: efficacité et coopération (professional interaction: effectiveness and cooperation). 2nd ed. Collection intervenir. Montreal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 2003.
46. Matthias MS, Salyers MP, Frankel RM. Re-thinking shared decision-making: context matters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):176–9. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.006.
47. Evans L, Hardy L. Injury rehabilitation: a goal-setting intervention study. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(3):310–9. doi:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609025.
48. Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Purposes and mechanisms of goal planning in rehabilitation: the need for a critical distinction. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(12):741–9. doi:10.1080/09638280500265961.
49. Randell KE, McEwen IR. Writing patient-centered functional goals. Phys Ther. 2000;80(12):1197–203.
50. Theodorakis Y, Beneca A, Malliou P, Goudas M. Examining psychological factors during injury rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil. 1997;6:355–63.
51. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Langley A, Falardeau M. Décider pour faciliter le retour au travail: Étude exploratoire sur les dimensions de la prise de décision dans une équipe interdisciplinaire de réadaptation au travail (decision-making to facilitate a return to work—exploratory study of the aspects of decision-making in an interdisciplinary work rehabilitation team). Montreal, Quebec: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité au travail; 2004.
52. King E, Taylor J, Williams RM, Vanson T. The MAGIC programme; evaluation. London, UK: The Health Foundation; 2013.
53. Maggs-Rapport F. Combining methodological approaches in research: ethnography and interpretive phenomenology. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(1):219–25. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01243.x.
54. O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ. Ottawa decision support tutorial: training practitioners in decision support. Ottawa Health Research Institute. 2007. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/ODST/. Accessed July 2007.
55. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. QSHC. 2003;12:93–9. doi:10.1136/qhc.12.2.93.
56. Corbière M, Bisson J, Lauzon S, Ricard N. Factorial validation of a French short-form of the working alliance inventory. Int J Meth Psych Res. 2006;15(1):36–45. doi:10.1002/mpr.27.
57. Amundson NE. Mattering: a foundation for employment counseling and training. J Employ Couns. 1993;30:146–52. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920.1993.tb00173.x.
58. Corbière M, Amundson NE. Perceptions of the ways of mattering by people with mental illness registered in supported employment programs. Career Dev Q. 2007;56(2):141–9. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2007.tb00026.x.
59. Broadbent E, Petriea KJ, Maina J, Weinman J. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60(6):631–7. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
60. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30. doi:10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
61. O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:570–81. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00083.x.
62. Durand MJ. Étude des effets du Retour Thérapeutique au Travail chez des travailleurs absents du travail suite à une lésion professionnelle au dos (study of the effects of a therapeutic return to work in workers on sick leave following a work-related back injury). Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada: Université de Sherbrooke; 1996.
63. Brehaut JC, O’Connor A, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23(4):281–92. doi:10.1177/0272989X03256005.
64. Tercyak KP, Johnson SB, Roberts SF, Cruz AC. Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43(1):73–84. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00146-4.
65. Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Loisel P, Beaudet J, Imbeau D. Travailleurs de la construction ayant une dorso-lombalgie: évaluation de l’implantation de la théorie d’un programme de collaboration précoce en réadaptation au travail (construction workers suffering from lumbar back pain: evaluation of the implementation of the theory of an early collaboration occupational rehabilitation program). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Institut de recherche Robert Sauvé en santé sécurité du travail; 2007.