What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

BMJ

Volumn 319, Issue 7212, 1999, Pages 780-

  Charles, Cathy ^a   Gafni, Amiram ^a   Whelan, Tim ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; PATIENT GUIDANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; UNCERTAINTY; VALUES;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCLOSURE; HUMANS; PATERNALISM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL VALUES; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 0033581295     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.780     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Emanuel E.J., Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2221–2226.
2. Levine M.N., Gafni A., Markham B., MacFarlane D. A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 53–58.
3. Beisecker A., Beisecker T. Using metaphors to characterize doctor-patient relationships: paternalism versus consumerism. Health Communication 1993; 5: 41–58.
4. Deber R. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 151: 171–177.
5. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patients' health-care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations. Med Decision Making 1995; 15: 101–106.
6. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or, it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681–692.
7. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 651–661.
8. Eddy DM. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA 1990; 263: 441–443.
9. Hughes T.E., Larson LN. Patient involvement in health care: a procedural justice viewpoint. Med Care 1991; 29: 297–303.
10. Whelan T.J., Levine M.N., Gafni A., Lukka H., Mohide E.A., Patel M., et al. Breast irradiation post lumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 847–853.
11. Cahill J. Patient participation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nursg 1996; 24: 561–571.
12. Quill T.E., Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 763–769.
13. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Ser Res Policy 1997; 2: 112–121.
14. Lomas J., Contandriopoulous AP. Regulating limits to medicine: towards harmony in public- and self-regulation. In: Evans R.G.,Barer ML,Marmor TR, eds. Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of the health of populations. New York: Adline De Gruyter, 1994: 253–283.
15. Iscoe N.A., Goel V., Wu K., Fehringer G., Holowaty E., Naylor D. Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 150: 345–352.