Fostering shared decision making by occupational therapists and workers involved in accidents resulting in persistent musculoskeletal disorders: A study protocol

Implementation Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Coutu, Marie France ^a   Légaré, France ^b,c   Durand, Marie José ^a   Corbière, Marc ^a   Stacey, Dawn ^d   Loisel, Patrick ^e   Bainbridge, Lesley ^f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION CENTER; RETURN TO WORK;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS; RETURN TO WORK;

EID: 79952702961     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-22     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work 2003, London UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
2. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Lariviere C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention - New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Disease Management & Health Outcomes 2001, 9:351-360.
3. Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Côté D, Rouleau A, Cadieux G. Transforming the Meaning of Pain: an Important Step for the Return to Work. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, & Rehabilitation 2010, 35:209-219.
4. Turk DC, Holzman AD, Kerns RD. Chronic pain. Self-Management of Chronic Disease 1986, 441-456. London: Academic Press, Holroyd KA, Creer TL.
5. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?. British Medical Journal 1999, 319:780-782. 1116606, 10488014.
6. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling 2008, 73:526-535.
7. O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingsworth G, McPherson R, Bunn H, Graham I, Drake E. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling 1998, 33:267-279.
8. Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Charpentier N, Rouleau A, Côté D, Cadieux G. Explorer les types d'écart de représentation entre le clinicien et le travailleur souffrant d'un trouble musculo-squelettique durant le processus de réadaptation au travail. Book Explorer les types d'écart de représentation entre le clinicien et le travailleur souffrant d'un trouble musculo-squelettique durant le processus de réadaptation au travail 2008, 37. Montreal: Institut de Recherche Robert Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité du Travail et Réseau provincial de recherche en adapation-réadaptation (REPAR) du FRSQ.
9. O'Connor AM, Hogg B, Stacey D, Légaré F, Graves E. Supporting patients in making safe health decisions, Paper presented at the TOH Patient Safety Day. Book Supporting patients in making safe health decisions, Paper presented at the TOH Patient Safety Day 2005,
10. Contandriopoulos AP, Champagne F, Denis J-L, Pineault R. L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes. Book L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes 1992,
11. Berk RA, Rossi PH. Thinking about program evaluation 1999, Beverly Hill, California: Thousand Oaks Sage, 2.
12. Love A. Implementation evaluation. Handbook of practical program evaluation 2004, 63-97. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE.
13. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Expressing and assessing program theory. Evaluation: A systematic approach 2004, 133-168. Sage Publications, 7.
14. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Loisel P, Berthelette D. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work: a journal of prevention, assessment and rehabilitation 2003, 21:233-242.
15. Gervais M, Pépin G, Carrière M. Triage ou comment adapter une technique de recherche à l'intervention clinique en ergothérapie. Revue Québécoise d'Ergothérapie 2000, 9:11-15.
16. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Lemaire J. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997, 22:2911-2918. 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00014, 9431627.
17. Geoffrion P. Le groupe de discussion. Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données 1997, 303-328. Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec, Gauthier B.
18. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2000, NewYork, USA: John Wiley.
19. McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Using logic models. Handbook of practical program evaluation 2004, 7-32. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE.
20. Ruland CM, Bakken S. Developing, implementing, and evaluating decision support systems for shared decision making in patient care: a conceptual model and case illustration. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2002, 35:313-321. 10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00037-6, 12968780.
21. Fortin MF. Le processus de la recherche; de la conception à la réalisation 1996, Ville Mont-Royal, Québec.
22. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation 1986, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, Second.
23. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations 1995, New York, USA: The Free Press, Fourth.
24. Legare F, Moher D, Elwyn G, LeBlanc A, Gravel K. Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007, 7:1-16. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30, 1780044, 17214888.
25. Légaré F, Graham I, O'Connor AM, Aubin M, Baillargeon L, Leduc Y, Maziade J. Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice. Health Expectations 2007, 10:364-379.
26. O'Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. The Ottawa Personal Decision Guide for People Facing Tough Health or Social Decisions 2006, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: University of Ottawa, Health Research Institute.
27. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decision-making in primary-care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:477-482. 1313449, 10562751.
28. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Measuring the involvment of patients in shared decision making: A systematic review of instrument. Patient Education and Counseling 2001, 1406:1-19.
29. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat J-P, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, Charlot J, Dreiser RL, Legrand E, Rozenberg S, et al. The Role of Activity in the Therapeutic Management of Back Pain: Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine 2000, 25(4S):1S-33S. 10.1097/00007632-200002151-00001, 10707404.
30. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good Prognosis For Low Back Pain When Left Untampered - a Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine 1995, 20:473-477. 10.1097/00007632-199502001-00011, 7747232.
31. Dionne C, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, Rossignol M, Stock S, Laroque I. A clinica return-to-work rule for patient with back pain. Can Med Assoc J 2005, 172:1559-1567.
32. Picavet HS, Vlaeyen JW, Schouten JS. Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia: predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002, 156:1028-1034. 10.1093/aje/kwf136, 12446259.
33. van Tulder M, Ostelo R, S VJW, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJJ. Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine 2000, 26:270-281.
34. Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, . Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation December 2005, 15:607-631. Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions.
35. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Fordyce WE, Nachemson AL. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Physical Therapy 1992, 72:279-290.
36. Frank JW, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. Canadian Medical Association 1998, 158:1625-1631.
37. Loisel P, Durand MJ. Worker accommodation, clinical intervention and return to work. Preventing and managing disability at work 2003, London, ON: Taylor & Francis, Sullivan T, Frank J.
38. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Langley A, Falardeau M. Décider pour faciliter le retour au travail: Étude exploratoire sur les dimensions de la prise de décision dans une équipe interdisciplinaire de réadaptation au travail. Book Décider pour faciliter le retour au travail: Étude exploratoire sur les dimensions de la prise de décision dans une équipe interdisciplinaire de réadaptation au travail 2004, Montreal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité au travail (IRSST).
39. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung W-Y, Grol R. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expectations 2005, 8:34-42. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x, 15713169.
40. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Grol R. Shared Decision Making: Measurement using the OPTION instrument 2005, Wales, UK: Cardiff University.
41. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTIONS scale for measuring patient involvement. Quality and Safety in health care 2003, 12:93-99. 10.1136/qhc.12.2.93, 1743691, 12679504.
42. Dy SM. Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making: A structured literature review. Medical Care 2007, 64(6):623-49.
43. Corbière M, Bisson J, Lauzon S, Ricard N. Factorial validation of a French short-form of the Working Alliance Inventory. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2006, 15:36-45.
44. Muhr T. ATLAS/ti--A prototype for the Support of Text Interpretation. Qualitative Sociology 1991, 14:349-371.
45. Landry R. L'analyse de contenu. Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données 1997, 329-356. Québec (Québec) Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec, Gauthier B.
46. Laperrière A. Les critères de scientificité des methodologies qualitatives. 1993, CQRS; Rimouski, Quebec.
47. Ottawa decision support tutorial: Training practitioners in decision support. , https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/ODST/
48. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal 2000, 321:694-696. 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694, 1118564, 10987780.
49. Légaré F, O'Connor A, Graham ID, Wells G, Jacobsen MJ, Elmslie T, Drake E. The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 50:211-212.