Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning

Psychological Research

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 411-424

  Rosner, Tamara M ^a   D’Angelo, Maria C ^a,b   MacLellan, Ellen ^a   Milliken, Bruce ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECALL; RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939879178     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0572-6     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E. F., & Besner, D. (2007). Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review,114(4), 1076–1086. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076.
2. Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18189009.
3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review,108(3), 624–652. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.I08.3.624.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature,402(6758), 179–181. doi:10.1038/46035.
5. Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. C. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology,3(367), 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367.
6. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition,36(8), 1484–1494. doi:10.3758/MC.36.8.1484.
7. Cañadas, E., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,142(3), 934–943. doi:10.1037/a0029794.
8. Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology,64(1–2), 191–209. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00109-1.
9. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 316–321. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893001.
10. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,12(10), 374–380. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001.
11. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics,16(1), 143–149.
12. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,36(1), 147–161. doi:10.1037/a0017598.
13. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition,13(1), 8–20.
14. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1431740.
15. Hirshman, E., & Mulligan, N. (1991). Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,17(3), 507–513.
16. Hirshman, E., Trembath, D., & Mulligan, N. (1994). Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20(3), 608–620.
17. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review,109(4), 679–709. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679.
18. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research,68(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y.
19. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638–644. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14620358.
20. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118(2), 126–135.
21. Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. NeuroImage,33(1), 399–405. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.012.
22. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. I., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science,303(5660), 1023–1026.
23. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 800–806. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17328376.
24. Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., De Belder, M., & Egner, T. (2013). Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli. Cerebral Cortex,. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht283.
25. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
26. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,15(4), 814–818. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.814.
27. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 75–102). London: Wiley.
28. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition,7(3), 166–174. doi:10.3758/BF03197535.
29. Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 684–700. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7159848.
30. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,14(1), 126–135.
31. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience,6(5), 450–452. doi:10.1038/nn1051.
32. McCabe, D. P., & Geraci, L. D. (2009). The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments. Consciousness and Cognition,18(2), 401–413. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.010.
33. Milliken, B., & Joordens, S. (1996). Negative priming without overt prime selection. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(4), 333–346. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9025325.
34. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology,4(2), 1–64.
35. Mulligan, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22(5), 1067–1087.
36. Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,25(1), 54–69.
37. Nairne, J. S. (1988). The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,14(2), 248–255.
38. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition,106(2), 1071–1080. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011.
39. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition,21(1), 89–102.
40. Richter, F. R., & Yeung, N. (2012). Memory and cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Science,23(10), 1256–1263. doi:10.1177/0956797612444613.
41. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174–176. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5812172.
42. Spapé, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said_ Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,15(6), 1117–1121. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117.
43. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10495845.
44. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology,18(6), 643–662.
45. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,28(6), 1345–1363. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345.
46. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology,26(1), 1–12.
47. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 727–735. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1435275.
48. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47(3), 631–650. doi:10.1080/14640749408401131.
49. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review,115(2), 518–525. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518.
50. Vietze, I., & Wendt, M. (2009). Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(7), 1391–1400. doi:10.1080/17470210802426908.
51. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2011). Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,18(5), 910–916. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4.
52. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Vietze, I. (2008). Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,15(1), 135–140. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.135.
53. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language,46(3), 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.
54. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language,34(5), 622–643.