Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 142-162

  Escrig Olmedo, Elena ^a   Muñoz Torres, María Jesús ^a   Fernández Izquierdo, María Ángeles ^a   Rivera Lirio, Juana María ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

commensurability; corporate environmental performance (CEP); fungibility; multi criterion decision making (MCDM) methods; stakeholders; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84939864501     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1904     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Accountability Rating. 2008. https://www.eni.com/en_IT/attachments/sostenibilita/impegno-sostenibilita/premi-e-riconoscimenti/AR_2008_methodology.pdf [15 February 2013]
2. Azzone G, Noci G, Manzini R, Welford R, Young W. 1996. Defining environmental performance indicators: An integrated framework. Business Strategy and the Environment 5(2): 69–80.
3. Banerjee SB. 2002. Corporate environmentalism. The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research 55: 177–191.
4. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T. 2007. Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decision Support Systems 43(3): 713–721.
5. Berry TC, Junkus JC. 2013. Socially responsible investing: an investor perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 112(4): 707–720.
6. Bhattacharyya A, Cummings L. 2013. Measuring corporate environmental performance – stakeholder engagement evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI:10.1002/bse.1819.
7. Bisbe J, Batista-Foguet JM, Chenhall R. 2007. Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7/8): 789–820.
8. Boggia A, Cortina C. 2010. Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. Journal of Environmental Management 91(11): 2301–2306.
9. Bojadziev G, Bojadziev M. 1995. Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications. Advances in Fuzzy Systems – Applications and Theory, 5. World Scientific: Singapore.
10. Capelle-Blancard G, Petitz A. 2012. The Weighting of CSR Dimensions: Does One Size Fit All? Working paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405801
11. Chan FTS, Qi HJ. 2003. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management 8(3): 209–223.
12. Clemens B, Bakstran L. 2010. A framework of theoretical lenses and strategic purposes to describe relationships among firm environmental strategy, financial performance, and environmental performance. Management Research Review 33(4): 393–405.
13. Delmas MA, Etzion D, Nairn-Birch N. 2013. Triangulating environmental performance: what do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture? Academy of Management Perspective 27(3): 255–267.
14. Escrig E, Muñoz MJ, Fernández MA. 2013. Sustainable development and the financial system: society's perceptions about socially responsible investing. Business Strategy and the Environment 22: 410–428.
15. Escrig E, Muñoz MJ, Fernández MA, Rivera JM. 2014. Lights and shadows on sustainability rating scoring. Review of Managerial Science 8(4): 559–574.
16. Eurosif. 2013. Shareholder Stewardship: European ESG Engagement Practice 2013. http://www.eurosif.org/publication/shareholder-stewardship-european-esg-engagement-practices-2013/ [15 April 2015].
17. First I, Khetriwal DS. 2010. Exploring the relationship between environmental orientation and brand value: is there fire or only smoke? Business Strategy and the Environment 19(2): 90–103.
18. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA.
19. Frey DD, Herder PM, Wijnia Y, Subrahmanian E, Katsikopoulos K, de Neufville R, Oye K, Clausing DP. 2010. Research in engineering design: the role of mathematical theory and empirical evidence. Research in Engineering Design 21: 45–151.
20. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2006. GRI Guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Sustainability-Reporting-Guidelines.pdf [15 January 2013].
21. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2011. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and Food Processing Sector Supplement 2011 (FPSS).
22. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2012. The Value of Extra-financial Disclosure. What Investors and Analysts Said. http://www.accountingforsustainability.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/What-investors-and-analysts-said-The-value-of-extra-financial-disclosure.pdf [15 January 2013].
23. Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A. 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 47: 345–354.
24. Graafland J, Eijffinger SC, Smid H. 2004. Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: methodological problems and robustness. Journal of Business Ethics 53(1/2): 137–152.
25. Guillaume S, Charnomordic B. 2012. Fuzzy inference systems: an integrated modeling environment for collaboration between expert knowledge and data using FisPro. Expert Systems with Applications 39(10): 8744–8755.
26. Gupta S, Gupta A. 2012. A fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for vendor evaluation in a supply chain. Interscience Management Review 2(3): 10–16.
27. Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Camón-Cala J. 2011. A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2448-5.
28. Hamdouch A, Zuindeau B. 2010. Sustainable development, 20 years on: methodological innovations, practices and open issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(4): 427–438.
29. Heal GM. 2008. When Principles Pay: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line. Columbia University Press: New York.
30. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, German A, Boiral O. 2015. Outcomes of environmental management systems: the role of motivations and firms’ characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI:10.1002/bse.1884.
31. Hilb M. 2010. Redesigning corporate governance: lessons learnt from the global financial crisis. Journal of Management and Governance 15: 533–538.
32. Hörisch J, Freeman RE, Schaltegger S. 2014. Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization and Environment 27(4): 328–346.
33. Ilinitch AY, Soderstrom NS, Thomas TE. 1998. Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17(4): 383–408.
34. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1999. ISO 14031. 1999. Environmental Management – Environmental Performance Evaluation Guidelines. ISO: Geneva.
35. Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance 16(5): 443–459.
36. Jung EJ, Kim JS, Rhee SK. 2001. The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(6): 551–563.
37. Kim MS, Kim DT, Kim JI. 2014. CSR for sustainable development: CSR beneficiary positioning and impression management motivation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21(1): 14–27.
38. Kolk A. 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(1): 1–15.
39. Krajnc DA, Glavič P. 2005. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development, resources. Conservation and Recycling 43(2): 189–208.
40. Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M. 2005. Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(4): 59–72.
41. Kurtz L. 2008. Socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Crane A, Williams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel DS (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 249–280.
42. Lee CC. 1990. Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller, part II. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 20(2): 419–435.
43. Lee KH, Cin BC, Lee EY. 2014. Environmental responsibility and firm performance: the application of an environmental, social and governance model. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI:10.1002/bse.1855.
44. Lefebvre E, Lefebvre LA, Talbot S. 2003. Determinants and impacts of environmental performance in SMEs. R&D Management 33(3): 263–283.
45. Lin H-Y, Hsu P-Y, Sheen G-J. 2007. A fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Systems with Applications 32(3): 939–953.
46. Liu KFR. 2007. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic. Environmental Management 39(5): 721–736.
47. Malik M. 2014. Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: a brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics 127(2): 419–438.
48. Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas EK. 2015. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications 42(8): 4126–4148.
49. Miras-Rodríguez MM, Carrasco-Gallego A, Escobar-Pérez B. 2014. Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their performance? A closer look at the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI:. DOI:10.1002/bse.1848.
50. Montiel I, Delgado-Ceballos J. 2014. Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: are we there yet? Organization and Environment 27(2): 113–139.
51. Muñoz MJ, Rivera JM, Moneva JM. 2008. Evaluating sustainability in organizations with a fuzzy logic approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems 108(6): 829–841.
52. Notarnicola B, Hayashi K, Curran MA, Huisingh D. 2012. Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 28: 1–8.
53. Ostrosi E, Ferney M. 2007. Computer aided consensus searching system for collaborative and distributed design process. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management (PLM'07), Garetti M, Terzi S, Ball P, Han S (eds). Inderscience: Geneva; 311–320.
54. Pedrycz W. 1994. Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets and Systems 64(1): 21–30.
55. Peloza J, Papania L. 2008. The missing link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Stakeholder salience and identification. Corporate Reputation Review 11: 169–181.
56. Phillis YA, Davis BJ. 2009. Assessment of corporate sustainability via fuzzy logic. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 55(1): 3–20.
57. Phillis YA, Evangelos Grigoroudis E, Kouikoglou VS. 2011. Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries. Ecological Economics 70(3): 542–553.
58. Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). 2014. Report on Progress 2014. http://www.unpri.org/publications/ [18 February 2014].
59. Rao P, O'Castillo O, Intal Jr. PS, Sajid A. 2006. Environmental indicators for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines: An empirical research. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(5): 505–515.
60. Rikhardsson PM. 1998. Information systems for corporate environmental management accounting and performance measurement. Greener Management International 21: 51–71.
61. Saghafian S, Hejazi SR. 2005. Multi-criteria group decision making using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS procedure. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modeling, Control and Automation. IEEE Computer Society: Vienna; 215–221.
62. Salvati L, Zitti M. 2009. Substitutability and weighting of ecological and economic indicators: exploring the importance of various components of a synthetic index. Ecological Economics 68(4): 1093–1099.
63. Santos F-JJ, Camargo HA. 2010. Fuzzy systems for multicriteria decision making. CLEI Electronic Journal 13(3): 1–8.
64. Searcy C. 2014. Measuring enterprise sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI:10.1002/bse.1861.
65. Silberhorn D, Warren RC. 2007. Defining corporate social responsibility: a view from big companies in Germany and the UK. European Business Review 19(5): 352–372.
66. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. 2009. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 9: 189–212.
67. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 15: 281–299.
68. Singh S, Olugu EU, Fallahpour A. 2014. Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 16(5): 847–860.
69. Smallman C, McDonald G, Mueller J. 2010. Prologue. Governing the corporation: structure, process and behavior. Journal of Management and Organization 16: 194–198.
70. Susskind L. 1999. A short guide to consensus building. In The Consensus Building Handbook: a Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, Susskind L, McKearnan S, Thomas-Larmer J (eds). Safe: London; 2–57.
71. Tregidga H, Milne M, Kearins K. 2014. (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39(6): 477–494.
72. Trumpp C, Endrikat J, Zopf C, Guenther E. 2015. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: a critical examination of a multidimensional construct. Journal of Business Ethics 126(2): 185–204.
73. Van den Bergh J. 2007. Sustainable development in ecological economics. In Handbook of Sustainable Development, Atkinson J, Dietz S, Neumayer E (eds). Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; 63–77.
74. Vveinhardt J, Gulbovaitė E. 2015. Expert evaluation of diagnostic instrument for personal and organizational value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2527-7.
75. Waddock SA, Graves SB. 1997. The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Review 10: 758–769.
76. Wang YM, Elhag TMS. 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 31(2): 309–319.
77. Wang T-C, Lee H-D. 2009. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications 36(5): 8980–8985.
78. Wells RP, Hochman MN, Hochman SD, O'Connell PA. 1992. Measuring environmental success. Total Quality Environmental Management 1(4): 315–327.
79. Windolph SE. 2011. Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability 1(1): 61–81.
80. Wood DJ. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691–718.
81. Wood DJ. 2010. Measuring corporate social performance: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1): 50–84.
82. Wu W-W, Lee Y-T. 2007. Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications 32(2): 499–507.
83. Xie S, Hayase K. 2007. Corporate environmental performance evaluation: A measurement model and a new concept. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(2): 148–168.
84. Yang T, Hung C-C. 2007. Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23(1): 126–137.
85. Young CW, Welford RJ. 1998. An environmental performance measurement framework for business. Greener Management International 21: 30–50.
86. Zadeh LA. 2009. What is Truth? Berkeley Initiative in Soft Computing (BISC) Group Seminar and Discussion. BISC, University of California at Berkeley.
87. Zeleney M. 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw Hill: New York.
88. Ziegler A, Busch T, Hoffmann VH. 2011. Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: an international empirical analysis. Energy Economics 33(6): 1283–1294.