Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 481-501

  Vveinhardt, Jolita ^a   Gulbovaitė, Evelina ^b  

^a LITHUANIAN SPORTS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Diagnostics; Expert evaluation; Instrument development; Organizational values; Personal values; Value congruence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920546018     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2527-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aminzadeh, F., Plotnikoff, R., & Edwards, N. (1999). Development and evaluation of the cane use cognitive mediator instrument. Nursing Research, 48(5), 269–275.
2. Bardauskiene, D. (2007). The expert’s estimates application in the preparation of city general plan. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 13(3), 223–236.
3. Beležentis, A., & Žalimaitė, M. (2011). Ekspertinių vertinimų taikymas inovacijų plėtros veiksnių analizėje: Lietuvos inovatyvių įmonių vertinimas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 3(27), 23–31.
4. Burinskiene, M., & Rudzkiene, V. (2009). Future insights, scenarios and expert method application in sustainable territorial planning. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), 10–25.
5. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884.
6. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311.
7. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Chaiyawat, W., & Brown, J. (2000). Psychometric Properties of the Thai versions of State-Trait anxiety inventory for children and child medical fear scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(5), 406–414.
9. Duobienė, J. (2014). Organizacinės verslininkystės vertinimo instrumentas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 36(1), 45–55.
10. Guillemin, F., Bonbardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.
11. Gulbovaitė, E. (2012). Asmeninių ir organizacinių vertybių kongruencija: bendros asmeniui ir organizacijai vertybės. Lietuvos aukštųjų mokyklų vadybos ir ekonomikos jaunųjų mokslininkų Konferencijų darbai, 15, 45–52.
12. Hannes, K., Lockwood, C., & Pearson, A. (2010). A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1736–1743.
13. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247.
14. Hecimovich, M. D., Peiffer, J. J., & Harbough, A. G. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of a post exercise exhaustion scale utilising the Rasch measurement model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(6), 569–579.
15. Hughes, L. (1998). Development of an instrument to measure caring peer group interactions. Journal of Nursing Education, 37(5), 202–207.
16. Hyrkas, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., & Oksa, L. (2003). Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(6), 619–625.
17. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
18. Lauver, K., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454–470.
19. Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37, 457–467.
20. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.
21. MacCarthy, B. L., & Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors Affecting Location Decisions in International Operations—a Delphi Study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(7), 794–818.
22. Maskeliūnaitė, L., Sivilevičius, H., & Podvezko, V. (2009). Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway. Transport, 24(2), 100–212.
23. McDonald, P., & Gandz, J. (1991). Identification of values relevant to business research. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 217–236.
24. O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing persona-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
25. Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods, 22(4), 295–318.
26. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bustamante, R. M., & Nelson, J. A. (2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research January, 4(1), 56–78.
27. Podvezko, V. (2008). Comprehensive evaluation of complex quantities. Business Theory and Practice, 9(3), 160–168.
28. Posner, B. Z., & Westwood, R. I. (1995). A cross-cultural investigation of the shared values relationship. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 8(3), 197–206.
29. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
30. Rudzkienė, V., & Burinskienė, M. (2007). Plėtros krypčių vertinimo ir valdymo informaciniai modeliai. Monografija. Vilnius: Technika.
31. Schilling, L. S., Dixon, J. K., Knafl, K. A., Grey, M., Ives, B., & Lynn, M. R. (2007). Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nursing Research, 56(5), 361–366.
32. Siegall, M., & McDonald, T. (2004). Person-organization value congruence, burnout and diversion of resources. Personnel Review, 33(3), 291–301.
33. Tidikis, R. (2003). Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės universitetas.
34. Tilden, V., Nelson, C., & May, B. (1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research, 39(3), 172–175.
35. Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2012a). Asmeninių ir organizacijos vertybių kongruencija: dialogo paieškos. Jaunųjų mokslininkų darbai, 1(34), 167–173.
36. Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2012b). Asmeninių ir organizacinių vertybių kongruencijos modelis. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos – kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai, 4(33), 113–124.
37. Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2013). Comparative analysis of the researches on personal and organizational value congruence. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 67, 127–142.
38. Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2014). Diagnostic Instruments for Value Congruence. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 2(2), 126–151.
39. Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating instrument content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518.