Wildlife habitat management

Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science)

Volumn , Issue 9783642319990, 2014, Pages 227-251

  Gordon, Sean N ^a   McPherson, Heather ^b   Dickson, Lowell ^b   Halofsky, Joshua ^b   Snyder, Chris ^b   Brodie, Angus W ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Washington Department of Natural Resources   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispersal habitat; EMDS; Habitat management; Northern spotted owl; Spatial decision support; Wildlife habitat

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIRDS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GRAPH THEORY; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; POPULATION STATISTICS;

DISPERSAL HABITAT; EMDS; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL; SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT; WILDLIFE HABITATS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 84939827154     PISSN: 18635520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32000-2_10     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adriaenssens V, Baets BD, Goethals PLM, Pauw ND (2004) Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. Sci Total Environ 319(1-3):1-12
2. Akçakaya HR, Raphael MG (1998) Assessing human impact despite uncertainty: viability of the northern spotted owl metapopulation in the northwestern USA. Biodivers Conserv 7:875-894
3. Andelman SJ, Beissinger S, Cochrane JF, Gerber L, Gomez-Priego P, Groves C, Haufler J, Holthausen R, Lee D, Maguire L, Noon B, Ralls K, Regan H (2001) Scientific standards for conducting viability assessments under the National Forest Management Act: report and recoomendations of the NCRAS working group. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara
4. Applied Biomathematics (2011) RAMAS analytical and educational software Applied Biomathematics, Inc. http://www.ramas.com/. Accessed 20 April 2011
5. Bailey RG (1996) Ecosystem geography. Springer, New York
6. Bourgeron PS, Humphries HC, Reynolds KM (2000) Conducting large-scale conservation evaluation and conservation area selection using a knowledge-based system. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th international conference on integrating geographic information systems and environmental modeling: problems, prospectus, and needs for research, banff, (AB) Canada
7. Buchanan JB (2004) Managing habitat for dispersing northern spotted owls-are the current management strategies adequate? Wildl Soc Bull 32(4):1333-1345
8. Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manage 59(4):265-278
9. Caughley G, Sinclair ARE (1994) Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston
10. Courtney SP, Blakesley JA, Bigley RE, Cody ML, Dumbacher JP, Fleisher RC, Franklin AB, Gutierez RJ, Marzluff JM, Sztukowski L (2004) Scientific evaluation of the status of the northern spotted owl. Sustainable Ecosystems Institute, Portland
11. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Noon BR, McGarigal K (2010) Use of abundance of one species as a surrogate for abundance of others. Conserv Biol 24(3):830-840. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01396.x
12. Dai JJ, Lorenzato S, Rocke DM (2004) A knowledge-based model of watershed assessment for sediment. Environ Model Software 19(4):423-433
13. Dawson WR, Ligon JD, Murphy JR, Myers JP, Simberloff D, Verner J (1987) Report of the scientific advisory panel on the spotted owl. The Condor 89(1):205-229
14. Doak D (1989) Spotted owls and old growth logging in the Pacific Northwest. Conserv Biol 3(4):389-396
15. ESA (1973) Endangered Species Act of 1973
16. Fall A, Fall J (2001) A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecol Model 141(1-3):1-18
17. Gallo K, Lanigan SH, Eldred P, Gordon SN, Moyer C (2005) Northwest Forest Plan-the first 10 years (1994-2003): preliminary assessment of the condition of watersheds. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
18. Gordon SN, Gallo K (2011) Structuring expert input for a knowledge-based approach to watershed condition assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan, USA. Environ Monit Assess 172(1):643-661
19. Guldin RW, Kaiser HF (2004) National report on sustainable forests-2003. USDA Forest Service, Washington
20. Hanson E, Hays D, Hicks L, Young L, Buchanan JB (1993) Spotted owl habitat in Washington: a report to the Washington Forest Practices Board. Washington Forest Practices Board, Spotted Owl Advisory Group, Olympia
21. Harrison S, Stahl A, Doak D (1993) Spatial models and spotted owls: exploring some biological issues behind recent events. Conserv Biol 7(4):950-953
22. Heaton J, Nussear K, Esque T, Inman R, Davenport F, Leuteritz T, Medica P, Strout N, Burgess P, Benvenuti L (2008) Spatially explicit decision support for selecting translocation areas for Mojave desert tortoises. Biodivers Conserv 17(3):575-590
23. Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Perrin N (2004) Biomapper 3.0. Laboratory for Conservation Biology, University of Lausanne, Division of Conservation Biology, University of Bern
24. Hulse D, Gregory S, Baker J (eds) (2002) Willamette River basin planning atlas: trajectories of environmental and ecological change. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
25. Humphries H, Bourgeron P, Reynolds K (2008) Suitability for conservation as a criterion in regional conservation network selection. Biodivers Conserv 17(3):467-492
26. Jensen M, Reynolds K, Langner U, Hart M (2009) Application of logic and decision models in sustainable ecosystem management. Paper presented at the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, HI, 5-8 Jan 2009
27. Johnson DH, O'Neil TA (eds) (2001) Wildlife-habitat relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
28. Lacy RC (2000) Structure of the VORTEX simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecological Bulletin 48:191-203
29. Lamberson RH, Noon BR, Voss C, McKelvey R (1994) Reserve design for territorial species: the effects of patch size and spacing on the viability of the Northern Spotted Owl. Conserv Biol 8(1):185-195
30. Lande R (1988) Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). Oecologia 75(4):601-607
31. Lang S (2004) Subdivision analysis with subdiv.avx extension for ArcView 3.x. Spatial Indicators for European Nature Conservation Project, Salzburg, Austria
32. Lee PL (1985) History and current status of spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) habitat management in the Pacific Northwest Region, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. In: Gutierrez RJ, Carey AB (eds) Ecology management of the Spotted Owl in the Pacific Northwest, vol GTR-PNW-185 USDA Forest Service. PNW Research Station, Portland, pp 5-9
33. Leslie PH (1945) The use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33(3):183-212
34. Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Smith PL, Possingham HP, Fischer J, Oliver I, McCarthy MA (2002) The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conserv Biol 16(2):338-345. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00450.x
35. Lint J (2005) Northwest Forest Plan-the first 10 years (1994-2003): status and trends of northern spotted owl populations and habitat. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
36. MacNally R, Fleishman E (2004) A successful predictive model of species richness based on indicator species. Conserv Biol 18(3):646-654. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00328_18_3.x
37. McComb WC, McGrath MT, Spies TA, Vesely D (2002) Models for mapping potential habitat at landscape scales: an example using northern spotted owls. For Sci 48(2):203-216
38. McGarigal K, Marks B (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
39. McGaughey RJ (1997) Visualizing forest stand dynamics using the stand visualization system. In: Proceedings of ACSM/ASPRS, vol 4, no 2, pp 48-57
40. Morrison ML, Marcot B, Mannan RW (2006) Modeling wildlife-habitat relationships. In: Morrison ML, Marcot B, Mannan RW (eds) Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Island Press, Washington, pp 320-376
41. Noss RF (1987) From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol Conserv 41:11-37
42. Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and the confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263(5147):641-646
43. Possingham HP, Davies I (1995) ALEX: a population viability analysis model for spatially structured populations. Biol Conserv 73:143-150
44. Reeves GH, Hohler DB, Larsen DP, Busch DE, Kratz K, Reynolds K, Stein KF, Atzet T, Hays P, Tehan M (2004) Aquatic and riparian effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. Gen. Technicl Report U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR
45. Reynolds K, Peets S (2001) Integrated assessment and priorities for protection and restoration of watersheds. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IUFRO 4.11 conference on forest biometry, modeling and information science, University of Greenwich, UK, 26-29 June
46. Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12(2):618-628. doi:10.1890%2F1051%2D0761%282002%29012%5B0618%3AATATOU%5D2.0.CO%3B2
47. Rempel RS, Carr AP (2003) Patch analyst extension for ArcView: version 3
48. Reynolds K, Gordon SN, Johnson KN (2008) Using logic to evaluate forest ecosystem sustainability. In: Paper presented at the forest criteria and indicators analytical framework and report workshop, Joensuu, Finland, 18-21 May 2008
49. Reynolds KM, Jensen ME, Andreasen J, Goodman I (2000) Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Comput Electron Agric 27:315-333
50. Reynolds K, Johnson KN, Gordon SN (2003) The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy Econ 5:433-446
51. Reynolds KM, Rodriguez S, Bevans K (2002) Ecosystem Management Decision Support 3.0 user guide. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis
52. ROD (1994) Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the range of the Northern Spotted Owl; GPO 1994-589-111/0001, U.S. Government Printing Office, Region No. 10: Washington, DC, USA
53. Roloff GJ, Wilhere GF, Quinn T, Kohlmann S (2001) An overview of models and their role in wildlife management. In: Johnson DH, O'Neil TA (eds) Wildlife-Habitat relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 512-536
54. Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape Urban Plann 83(2-3):91-103
55. Schumaker NH (1996) Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77(4):1210-1225
56. Schumaker NH, Ernst T, White D, Baker J, Haggerty P (2004) Projecting wildlife responses to alternative future landscapes in Oregon's Willamette basin. Ecol Appl 14(2):381-401
57. Seaber PR, Kapinos PF, Knapp GL (1987) Hydrologic unit maps. Water-supply paper 2294. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington
58. Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83(3):247-257
59. Singleton PH, Gaines WL, Lehmkuhl JF (2002) Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
60. Staus NL, Strittholt JR, Dellasala DA (2010) Evaluating areas of high conservation value in western Oregon with a decision-support model. Conserv Biol 24(3):711-720
61. Sutherland GD, O'Brien DT, Fall SA, Waterhouse FL, Harestad AS, Buchanan JB (2007) A framework to support landscape analyses of habitat supply and effects on populations of forest-dwelling species: a case study based on the northern spotted owl. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Victoria
62. Theobald DM, Norman JB, Sherburne MR (2006) FunConn v1 user's manual: ArcGIS tools for functional connectivity modeling. Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO
63. Thomas JW, Forsman ED, Lint J, Meslow EC, Noon BR, Verner J (1990) A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. Report of the interagency scientific committee to address the conservation of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service, Portland
64. Turban E, Aronson JE (2001) Decision support systems and intelligent systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
65. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS] (1984) Final regional guide and final environmental impact statement for the Pacific Northwest region. Portland
66. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] (1981) Ecological services manual 103. Standards for the development of habitat suitability index models. Division of Ecological Services, Washington
67. Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82(5):1205-1218. doi:10.1890%2F0012%2D9658%282001%29082%5B1205:LCAGTP%5D2.0.CO%3B2
68. Walker R, Keithley C, Henly R, Downie S, Cannata S (2007) Ecosystem Management Decision Support (EMDS) applied to watershed assessment on California's North Coast. In: Standiford RB, Giusti GA, Valachovic Y, Zielinski WJ, Furniss MJ (eds) Proceedings of the redwood region forest science symposium: what does the future hold? Gen. Technical Report GTRPSW- 194. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany California
69. Washington Department of Natural Resources [WADNR] (2004) Final environmental impact statement on alternatives for sustainable forest management of state trust lands in western Washington and for determining the sustainable harvest level. Olympia, WA
70. Washington Department of Natural Resources [WADNR] (2010a) Forest land plan for the South Puget Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) planning unit: final environmental impact statement. Olympia, WA
71. Washington Department of Natural Resources [WADNR] (2010b) Science behind the choices: biodiversity, DNR and what does an indicator species have to do with it? http:// washingtondnr.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/science-behind-the-choices-biodiversity-dnr-andwhat-does-an-indicator-species-have-to-do-with-it/. Accessed 22 Oct 2011
72. White MD, Heilman GE Jr, Stallcup JA (2005) Science assessment for the Sierra Checkerboard Initiative. Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis
73. Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Holthausen RS, Wisdom MJ (2008) Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. Bioscience 58(3):241-252. doi:10.1641/b580310
74. Zabel CJ, Dunk JR, Stauffer HB, Roberts LM, Mulder BS, Wright A (2003) Northern spotted owl habitat models for research and management application in California (USA). Ecol Appl 13(4):1027-1040