Use of abundance of one species as a surrogate for abundance of others;Uso de la abundancia de una especie como sustituta de la abundancia de otras

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 830-840

  Cushman, Samuel A ^a   McKelvey, Kevin S ^a   Noon, Barry R ^b   McGarigal, Kevin ^c  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity monitoring; Bird communities; Indicator species; Surrogate species

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOINDICATOR; BIRD; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LITERATURE REVIEW;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIRDS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING;

AVES;

EID: 77956572896     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01396.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andelman, S. J, and W.F. Fagan. 2000. Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:5954-5959.
2. Block, W.M., L.A. Brennan, and R.J. Gutierrez. 1987. Evaluation of guild-indicator species for use in resource management. Environmental Management 11:265-269.
3. Cushman, S.A., and K. McGarigal. 2002. Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecology 17:637-646.
4. Cushman, S.A., and K. McGarigal. 2003. Lanscape-level patterns of avian diversity in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Monographs 73:259-281.
5. Cushman, S.A., and K. McGarigal. 2004. Hierarchial analysis of forest bird species environment relationships in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Applications 14:1090-1105.
6. Cushman, S.A., and K. McGarigal. 2004b. Patterns in the speciesenvironment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 105:117-124.
7. Cushman, S.A., and K.S. McKelvey. 2009. Data on distribution and abundance: monitoring for research and management. In press in S.A. Cushman and F. Huettmann, editors. Spatial complexity, informatics and animal conservation. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo.
8. Cushman, S.A., K.S. McKelvey, C.H. Flather, and K. McGarigal. 2008. Do forest community types provide a sufficient basis to evaluate biological diversity? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:13-17.
9. Fuller, R.J. and D.R. Langslow. 1984. Estimating numbers of birds by point counts: how long should counts last? Bird Study 31:195-202.
10. Gause, G.F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
11. Grenyer, R., et al. 2006. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444:93-96.
12. Hansen, A.J., and D.L. Urban. 1992. Avian response to landscape pattern: the role of species' life histories. Landscape Ecology 7:163-180.
13. Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks, Cold Spring Harbor Symposium. Quantitative Biology 22:415-427.
14. Lambeck, R.J. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11:849-856.
15. Landres, P.B. 1992. Ecological indicators: panacea or liability? Pages 1295-1318 in D.H. McKenzie, D.E. Hyatt, and V.J. McDonald, editors. Ecological Indicators. Volume 2. Elsevier Applied Science, New York.
16. Landres, P.B., J. Verner, and J.W. Thomas. 1988. Critique of vertebrate indicator species. Conservation Biology 2:316-328.
17. Lindenmayer, D.B., A.D. Manning, P.L. Smith, H.P. Possingham, J. Fischer, I. Oliver, and M.A. McCarthy. 2002. The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conservation Biology 16:338-345.
18. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modeling 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19. Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967.
20. MacArthur, R.H. 1967. Limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist 101:338-345.
21. Manley, P.N., W.J. Zielinski, M.D. Schlesinger, and S.R. Mori. 2004. Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale. Ecological Applications 14:296-310.
22. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.
23. McGarigal, K. and S.A. Cushman. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 12:335-345.
24. McGarigal, K., S.A. Cushman, and S. Stafford. 2000. Multivariate statistics for wildlife and ecology research. Springer-Verlag, New York.
25. McGarigal, K., and W.C. McComb. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecological Monographs 65:235-260.
26. Nichols, J.D., and B.K. Williams. 2006. Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:668-673.
27. Noon, B.R., K.S. McKelvey, and B.G. Dickson. 2008. Multispecies conservation planning on U. S. federal lands. Pages 51-83 in J.J. Millspaugh and F.R. Thompson, editors. Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. Elsevier Science, San Diego, California.
28. Pulliam, H.R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349-361.
29. Roberge, J-M., and P. Angelstam. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18:76-85.
30. Sherry, T.W. 1979. Competitive interactions and adaptive strategies of American redstarts and least flycatchers in a northern hardwood forest. Auk 96:265-283.
31. Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is singlespecies management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83:247-257.
32. Verner, J. 1984. The guild concept applied to management of bird populations. Environmental Management 8:1-14.
33. Verner, J. 1988. Optimizing the duration of point counts for monitoring trends in bird populations. Research note PSW-395. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Berkeley, California.
34. Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385-397.
35. Wiens, J.A., G.D. Hayward, R.S. Holthausen, and M.J. Wisdom. 2008. Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. BioScience 58:241-252.