The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 433-446

  Reynolds, Keith M ^a   Johnson, K Norman ^b   Gordon, Sean N ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criteria and indicators; Decision support; Ecosystem; Forest; Knowledge base; Logic; Model; Montreal Process; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LOGIC-BASED SYSTEMS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 0345393856     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00041-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Adriaanse, A., 1993. Policy Performance Indicators. SDU Publishers, The Hague.
2. Castañeda, F., 2001. Collaborative action and technology transfer as a means of strengthening the implementation of national-level criteria and indicators. In: Raison, R.J., Brown, A.G., Flinn, D.W. (Eds.), Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. IUFRO 7 Research Series. CABI Publishing, New York, pp. 145-163.
3. CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research), 1999. The C1FOR criteria and indicators generic template. Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series, No. 2. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
4. Colfer, C.J.P., Woelfel, J., Wadley, R.L., Harwell, E., 1996. Assessing people's perceptions of forests in Danau Sentarum Wildlife Reserve. CIFOR Working Paper No. 13. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
5. Davis, L., Johnson, K.N., Bettinger, P., Howard, T., 2000. Forest Management, fourth ed. New York, McGraw Hill.
6. FEMAT. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. 1993-793-071. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
7. Franklin, J., 1993. The fundamentals of ecosystem management with applications to the Northwest. In: Aplet, G., Johnson, N., Olson, J., Sample, A. (Eds.), Defining sustainable forest. Island Press, pp. 127-144.
8. FSC (Forest Stewardship Council), 2000. FSC principles and criteria. Document 1.2 Revised February 2000. Available from http://www.fscoax.org/ principal.htm.
9. FuzzyTech, 1999. FuzzyTech User Guide. Fuzzy Tech, Berlin.
10. Haggith, M., Prabhu, R., Purnomo, H., Sukadri, D., Yasmi, Y., 1998. CIMAT criteria and indicators modification and adaptation tool. Available from http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/cim-atweb/ie4/cimat.htm.
11. Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., Woodward, R., 1995. Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
12. Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., Greene, S., 1999. Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC.
13. Lélé, S., Norgaard, R.B., 1996. Sustainability and the scientist's burden. Conservation Biology 10, 354-365.
14. Montreal Process, 1997. First Approximation Report of the Montreal Process. The Montreal Process Liaison Office, Ottawa, Canada.
15. Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), 2000. Oregon's First Approximation Report for Forest Sustainability. Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon.
16. Prabhu, R., Colfer, C.J.P., Dudley, R.G., 1999a. Guidelines for developing, testing and selecting criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series, No. 1. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
17. Prabhu, R., Haggith, M., Purnomo, H., Rizal, A., Sukadri, D., Taylor, J., Yasmi Y., 1999b. CIMAT (Criteria and Indicators Modification and Adaptation Tool). Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series, No. 3. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
18. Prabhu, R., Ruitenbeek, H.J., Boyle, T.J.B., Colfer, C.J.P., 2001. Between voodoo science and adaptive management: the role and research needs for indicators of sustainable forest management. In: Raison, R.J., Brown, A.G., Flinn, D.W. (Eds.), Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. IUFRO 7 Research Series. CABI Publishing, New York, pp. 39-66.
19. Raison, R.J., Flinn, D.W., Brown, A.G., 2001. Application of criteria and indicators to support sustainable forest management: some key issues. In: Raison, R.J., Brown, A.G., Flinn, D.W. (Eds.), Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. IUFRO 7 Research Series. CABI Publishing, New York, pp. 2-18.
20. Reynolds, K.M., 1999. NetWeaver for EMDS version 2.0 user guide: a knowledge base development system. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-471. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
21. United Nations, 1992. Forest Principles: Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. United Nations, New York.
22. USDA Forest Service, 1996. Status of the interior Columbia Basin: summary of scientific findings. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-385. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
23. WGCICSMTBF (Working Group on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests) 1995. Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests: the Montreal Process. Canadian Forest Service, Hull, Quebec.
24. Zadeh, L.A., 1976. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part III. Information Science 9, 43-80.