Increased risk of revision for high flexion total knee replacement with thicker tibial liners

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 96 B, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 217-223

  Namba, R S ^a   Inacio, M C S ^a   Cafri, G ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE LIGAMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TRAINING; THICKNESS; TIBIAL KNEE PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

HIGH FLEX; REVISION; THR; TKA; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84939650292     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32625     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674-679.
2. Nutton RW, van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Gaston P, Wade FA. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:37-42.
3. Weeden SH, Schmidt R. A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:349-352.
4. Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS. High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1457-1461.
5. Bollars P, Luyckx JP, Innocenti B, et al. Femoral component loosening in highflexion total knee replacement: an in vitro comparison of high-flexion versus conventional designs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:1355-1361.
6. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:174-176.
7. Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, et al. The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion: four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1626-1633.
8. Melton JT, Mayahi R, Baxter SE, Facek M, Glezos C. Long-term outcome in an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: a 15-to 18-year survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 2012;94-B:1067-1070.
9. Arthur CH, Wood AM, Keenan AC, et al. Ten-year results of the Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:177-180.
10. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;392:315-318.
11. Berend ME, Davis PJ, Ritter MA, et al. Thicker polyethylene bearings are associated with higher failure rates in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:17-20.
12. Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Khatod M, Yue EJ, Namba RS. Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: aligning operations with information technology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2646-2663.
13. Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Kiley ML. The Kaiser Permanente implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities. Perm J 2012;16:33-40.
14. Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, et al. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013;39:246-252.
15. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239-243.
16. Lin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 1989;84:1074-1078.
17. Moons KG, Donders RA, Stijnen T, Harrell FE Jr. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1092-1101.
18. White IR, Royston P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat Med 2009;28:1982-1998.
19. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley, 1987.
20. Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K. Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:39-42.
21. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;464:53-60.
22. Paxton EW, Furnes O, Namba RS, et al. Comparison of the Norwegian knee arthroplasty register and a United States arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93(Suppl):20-30.
23. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RB, Naudie DD. The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:108-114.
24. Maniar RN, Singhi T. High-flex rotating platform knee implants: two-to 6-year results of a prospective study. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:598-603.
25. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Safety and efficacy of a rotating-platform, high-flexion knee design three-to five-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:201-206.