Kaiser permanente national total joint replacement registry: Aligning operations with information technology

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2646-2663

  Paxton, Elizabeth W ^a   Inacio, Maria C S ^a   Khatod, Monti ^a   Yue, Eric J ^a   Namba, Robert S ^a  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DECISION MAKING; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; DATA MINING; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL DEVICE RECALL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DATA MINING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL DEVICE RECALLS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957368293     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Quality Indicators. Patient Safety Indicators Download. Vol http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/ psi-download.htm 2007. Accessed June 14, 2010.
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed June 14, 2010.
3. SA Bini DC Fithian LW Paxton MX Khatod MC Inacio RS Namba 2010 Does discharge disposition after primary total joint arthroplasty affect readmission rates? J Arthroplasty 25 114 117 10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.007 19150214
4. TJ Gioe KK Kileen K Grimm S Mehle K Scheltema 2004 Why are total knee replacements revised? Clin OrthopRelat Res. 428 100 110 10.1097/01.blo. 0000147136.98303.9d
5. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. Rockville, MD: AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality); April 2007. HHSA29020050035I T01. Publication No 07-EHC001-1.
6. LI Havelin LB Engesaeter B Espehaug O Furnes SA Lie SE Vollset 2000 The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73, 000 arthroplasties Acta Orthop Scand. 71 337 353 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvnslGisw%3D%3D 10.1080/000164700317393321 11028881
7. P Herberts H Malchau 1997 How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden Clin Orthop Relat Res 344 44 60 10.1097/00003086-199711000-00006 9372757
8. P Herberts H Malchau 2000 Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160, 000 cases Acta Orthop Scand 71 111 121 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgvFWmtw%3D%3D 10.1080/000164700317413067 10852315
9. M Khatod T Barber E Paxton R Namba D Fithian 2006 An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry Clin Orthop Relat Res 447 19 23 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78 16741469
10. M Khatod M Inacio EW Paxton SA Bini RS Namba RJ Burchette DC Fithian 2008 Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17, 080 replacements from 1995 through 2004 Acta Orthop 79 812 819 10.1080/17453670810016902 19085500
11. S Kurtz K Ong E Lau F Mowat M Halpern 2007 Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89 780 785 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 17403800
12. SM Kurtz E Lau K Ong K Zhao M Kelly KJ Bozic 2009 Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030 Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 2606 2612 10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6 19360453
13. SM Kurtz KL Ong J Schmier F Mowat K Saleh E Dybvik J Karrholm G Garellick LI Havelin O Furnes H Malchau E Lau 2007 Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 Suppl 3 144 151 10.2106/JBJS.G.00587 17908880
14. H Malchau P Herberts L Ahnfelt 1993 Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92, 675 operations performed 1978-1990 Acta Orthop Scand 64 497 506 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlsFKnsA%3D%3D 10.3109/17453679308993679 8237312
15. H Malchau P Herberts T Eisler G Garellick P Soderman 2002 The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 Suppl 2 2 20 12479335
16. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250-278; quiz 279-280.
17. RS Namba Y Chen EW Paxton T Slipchenko DC Fithian 2009 Outcomes of routine use of antibiotic-loaded cement in primary total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 24 6 Suppl 44 47 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.007 19577881
18. RS Namba M Inacio 2007 Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 22 6 Suppl 2 58 61 10.1016/j.arth.2007. 02.010 17823017
19. RS Namba L Paxton DC Fithian ML Stone 2005 Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients J Arthroplasty 20 7 Suppl 3 46 50 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.023 16214002
20. Paxton E, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian D. The Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry. The Permanente Journal. 2008;12:12-16. Available at: www.kp.org/permanentejournal. Accessed June 14, 2010.