The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: An analysis of 1534 cases

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 108-114

  McCalden, Richard W ^a   MacDonald, Steven J ^a   Charron, Kory D J ^a   Bourne, Robert B ^a   Naudie, Douglas D ^a  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLEXION CONTRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE FUNCTION; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 73449117154     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Anderson CK, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Cipriano LM, Warner S, Zaric GS. Looking Forward to 2015: Comparing Wait List Management Options. London, Ontario: Ontario Joint Replacement Registry; March 2006.
2. M Arabori N Matsui R Kuroda K Mizuno M Doita M Kurosaka S Yoshiya 2008 Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA J Orthop Sci. 13 46 50 10.1007/s00776-007-1191-5 18274855 (Pubitemid 351622964)
3. JN Argenson GR Scuderi RD Komistek WN Scott MA Kelly JM Aubaniac 2005 In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty J Biomech. 38 277 284 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.027 15598454 (Pubitemid 39642948)
4. J Bellemans S Banks J Victor H Vandenneucker A Moemans 2002 Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84 50 53 10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.12432 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387gsFCnsA%3D%3D 11837832
5. SI Bin TS Nam 2007 Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 15 350 355 10.1007/s00167-006-0202-y 17072657
6. R Chaudhary LA Beaupre DW Johnston 2008 Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 2579 2586 10.2106/JBJS.G.00995 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1cjnvFagtw%3D%3D 19047702
7. CR Clark CH Rorabeck S MacDonald D MacDonald J Swafford D Cleland 2001 Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 392 208 212 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00025 11716384
8. DA Dennis RD Komistek GR Scuderi SM Zingde 2007 Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 464 53 60 17621230
9. DA Dennis RD Komistek JB Stiehl SA Walker KN Dennis 1998 Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions J Arthroplasty. 13 748 752 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90025-0 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FhslKmuw%3D%3D 9802659 (Pubitemid 28473740)
10. JR Foran MA Mont G Etienne LC Jones DS Hungerford 2004 The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 1609 1615 15292406
11. JR Foran MA Mont AD Rajadhyaksha LC Jones G Etienne DS Hungerford 2004 Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a comparison with a matched control group J Arthroplasty. 19 817 824 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.017 15483795 (Pubitemid 39304223)
12. SK Gupta AS Ranawat V Shah BA Zikria JF Zikria CS Ranawat 2006 The PFC sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study Orthopedics 29 Suppl S49 S52 17002149
13. HS Han SB Kang KS Yoon 2007 High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1457 1461 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19840 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2snntlWqtw%3D%3D 17998181 (Pubitemid 350273239)
14. BM Hanratty NW Thompson RK Wilson DE Beverland 2007 The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 915 918 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.18920 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svlsFGgsw%3D%3D 17673585 (Pubitemid 47322790)
15. K Harato RB Bourne J Victor M Snyder J Hart MD Ries 2008 Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial Knee. 15 217 221 10.1016/j.knee.2007.12.007 18325770
16. G Hawker J Wright P Coyte J Paul R Dittus R Croxford B Katz C Bombardier D Heck D Freund 1998 Health-related quality of life after knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80 163 173 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ks1WhtQ%3D%3D 9486722
17. HT Huang JY Su GJ Wang 2005 The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up J Arthroplasty. 20 674 679 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.053 16310007 (Pubitemid 41073485)
18. WC Jacobs DJ Clement AB Wymenga 2005 Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework Acta Orthop. 76 757 768 10.1080/17453670510045345 16470427
19. H Kawamura RB Bourne 2001 Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty J Orthop Sci. 6 248 252 10.1007/s007760100043 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvjslyhsg%3D%3D 11484119 (Pubitemid 32578322)
20. YH Kim Y Choi OR Kwon JS Kim 2009 Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91 753 760 10.2106/JBJS.H.00805 19339558
21. YH Kim KS Sohn JS Kim 2005 Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 1470 1475 10.2106/JBJS.D.02707 15995113 (Pubitemid 40917746)
22. R Laskin 2007 The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty Orthopedics 30 Suppl 86 88 17824344
23. WJ Maloney DJ Schurman 1992 The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs Clin Orthop Relat Res. 278 147 152 1563146
24. A Malviya EA Lingard DJ Weir DJ Deehan 2009 Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 17 491 498 10.1007/s00167-008-0712-x 19139846
25. S Maruyama S Yoshiya N Matsui R Kuroda M Kurosaka 2004 Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 19 349 353 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.010 15067650 (Pubitemid 38519830)
26. McCalden RW, Macdonald SJ, Bourne RB, Marr JT. A randomized controlled trial comparing 'high-flex' vs 'standard' posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 May 14 [Epub ahead of print].
27. JW Pritchett DT Bortel 1991 Knee replacement in morbidly obese women Surg Gynecol Obstet. 173 119 122 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2Fit12jtQ%3D%3D 1925861
28. V Rajgopal RB Bourne BM Chesworth SJ MacDonald RW McCalden CH Rorabeck 2008 The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 23 795 800 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.005 18534516
29. CS Ranawat 2003 Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 174 176 10.1097/01.blo.0000093028.56370.46 14646758
30. O Robertsson M Dunbar T Pehrsson K Knutson L Lidgren 2000 Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden Acta Orthop Scand. 71 262 267 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpvFGitw%3D%3D 10919297
31. JK Seon SJ Park KB Lee TR Yoon M Kozanek EK Song 2009 Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91 672 679 10.2106/JBJS.H.00300 19255229
32. JK Seon EK Song JY Lee 2005 Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty Orthopedics 28 Suppl s1247 s1250 16235448
33. MG Shi HS Lu ZP Guan 2006 Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty [in Chinese] Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 44 1101 1105 17081464
34. B Stickles L Phillips WT Brox B Owens WL Lanzer 2001 Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty Obes Res. 9 219 223 10.1038/oby.2001.24 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzktlKltA%3D%3D 11323448
35. J Suggs Y-M Kwon S Durbhakula G Hanson G Li 2009 In vivo flexion and kinematics of the knee after TKA: comparison of a conventional and a high flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17 150 156 10.1007/s00167-008-0637-4 18839144
36. PG Sultan E Most S Schule G Li HE Rubash 2003 Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 167 173 10.1097/01.blo.0000081937.75404.ee 14646757
37. SH Weeden R Schmidt 2007 A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion J Arthroplasty. 22 349 352 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.007 17400089 (Pubitemid 46484003)
38. R Winiarsky P Barth P Lotke 1998 Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80 1770 1774 1:STN:280: DyaK1M%2FptFWlsA%3D%3D 9875934
39. D Wohlrab J Ditl R Herrschelmann U Schietsch W Hein R Hube 2005 Does the NexGen LPS flex mobile knee prosthesis offer advantages compared to the NexGen LPS?-A comparison of clinical and radiological results Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 143 567 572 10.1055/s-2005-836828 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrkvVejuw%3D%3D 16224678 (Pubitemid 41558604)