High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1457-1461

  Han, H S ^a   Kang, S B ^a   Yoon, K S ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASEPSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR SHAFT; FLEXOR REFLEX; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INCIDENCE; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KOREA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37249046365     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19840     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1073-6.
2. Epinette JA, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: clinical experience at 10 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:34-8.
3. Oliver MC, Keast-Butler OD, Hinves BL, Sheppard JA. A hydroxyapatite-coated Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement: 11 year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:478-82.
4. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, et al. Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2003;410:131-8.
5. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 2001;17(Suppl 1):59-62.
6. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:191-8.
7. Hefzy MS, Kelly BP, Cooke TD, al-Baddah AM, Harrison L. Knee kinematics in vivo of kneeling in deep flexion examined by bi-planar radiographs. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997;33:453-8.
8. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:50-3.
9. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Ribash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 2003;16:167-73.
10. Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2005;38:277-84.
11. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimising flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop 1985;194:285-90.
12. Delp SL, Kocmond JH, Sterm SH. Tradeoffs between motion and stability in posterior substituting knee arthroplasty design. J Biomech 1995;28:1155-66.
13. Li PL, Zamora J, Bentley G. The results at ten years of the Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement: clinical, radiological and survivorship studies. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:647-53.
14. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12.
15. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. The effect of tibial polyethylene insert design on range of motion: evaluation of in vivo knee kinematics by a computerized navigation system during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:986-91.
16. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350-5.
17. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674-9.
18. Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1470-5.
19. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, et al. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop 2004;428:174-9.
20. Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Doohen RR, et al. Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:160-5.
21. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, et al. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1721-9.
22. Morra EA, Greenwald AS. Polymer insert stress in total knee designs during high-flexion activities: a finite element study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A(Suppl 2):120-4.
23. Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY. Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005;28(10 Suppl):1247-50.
24. Most E, Sultan PG, Park SE, Papannagari R, Li G. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA. Clin Orthop 2006;452:59-64.
25. Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, et al. The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion: four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1626-33.
26. King TV, Scott RD. Femoral component loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1985;194:285-90,
27. Ritter MA. High-flexion knee designs: more hype than hope?: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl 1):40-1.
28. Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 2002;20:881-6.
29. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005;13:193-6.
30. Most E, Li F, Sultan PG, Park SE, Rubash HE. Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:529-35.
31. Park KK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK. Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:604-8.
32. Thambyah A, Goh JC, De SD. Contact stresses in the knee joint in deep flexion. Med Eng Phys 2005;27:329-35.
33. Zhang Y, Hunter DJ, Nevitt MC, et al. Association of squatting with increased prevalence of radiographic tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis: the Beijing Osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1187-92.
34. Felson DT, Hannan MT, Naimark A, et al. Occupational physical demands, knee bending, and knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Study. J Rheumatol 1991;18:1587-92.
35. Coggon D, Croft P, Kellingray S, et al. Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1443-9.
36. Nagura T, Matsumoto H, Kiriyama Y, Chaudhari A, Andriacchi TP. Tibiofemoral joint contact force in deep knee flexion and its consideration in knee osteoarthritis and joint replacement. J Appl Biomech 2006;22:305-13.
37. Li G, Zayontz S, DeFrate LE, et al. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 2004;22:90-5.
38. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:1199-200.
39. Nakayama K, Matsuda S, Miura H, et al. Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:483-8.
40. Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, et al. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:395-402.
41. Klein GR, Restrepo C, Hozack WJ. The effect of knee component design changes on range of motion evaluation in vivo by a computerized navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:623-7.
42. Russo A, Montagna L, Bragonzoni L, Zampagni ML, Marcacci M. Fixation of total knee arthroplasty improved by mobile-bearing design. Clin Orthop 2005;437:186-95.
43. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:638-46.
44. Chapman-Sheath PJ, Bruce WJ, Chung WK, et al. In vitro assessment of proximal polyethylene contact surface areas and stresses in mobile bearing knees. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:437-43.
45. Henricson A, Dalen T, Nilsson KG. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006;448:114-21.
46. Shepard MF, Kabo JM, Lieberman JR. Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components. Clin Orthop 2000;381:26-35.
47. Nuno N, Amabili M, Groppetti R, Rossi A. Static coefficient of friction between Ti-6A1-4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:191-200.
48. Nuno N, Groppetti R, Senin N. Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:965-62.
49. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop 1998;355:90-102.
50. Pittman GT, Peters CL, Hines JL, Bachus KN. Mechanical bone strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:883-8.
51. Cheng K, Pruitt L, Zaloudek C, Ries MD. Osteolysis caused by tibial component debonding in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006;443:333-6.
52. Barink M, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt M. A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2003;217:325-32.
53. Hefzy MS, Kelly BP, Cooke TD. Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:302-7.
54. van Lenthe GH, Willems MM, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:630-7.