Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: Psychological well-being beyond motor improvement

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 219-225

  Calabrò, Rocco S ^a   De Cola, Maria C ^a   Leo, Antonino ^a   Reitano, Simone ^a   Balletta, Tina ^a   Trombetta, Giovanni ^a   Naro, Antonino ^a   Russo, Margherita ^a   Bertè, Francesco ^a   De Luca, Rosaria ^a   Bramanti, Placido ^a  

^a IRCCS CENTRO NEUROLESI BONINO PULEJO   (Italy)

Author keywords

chronic stroke; coping strategies; gait training; psychological well being; robotic neurorehabilitation

Indexed keywords

NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; ROBOTICS;

CHRONIC STROKE; COPING STRATEGIES; GAIT TRAINING; NEUROREHABILITATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING;

EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS;

ADULT; AGED; CONVALESCENCE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; PSYCHOLOGY; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84939507791     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: 14735660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000114     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balaban B, Tok F. (2014). Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. Phys Med Rehabil 6: 635-642
2. Banz R, Bolliger M, Colombo G, Dietz V, Lünenburger L. (2008). Computerized visual feedback: an adjunct to robotic-assisted gait training. Phys Ther 88: 1135-1145
3. Calabrò RS, Reitano S, Leo A, de Luca R, Melegari C, Bramanti P. (2014). Can robot-assisted movement training (Lokomat) improve functional recovery and psychological well-being in chronic stroke?. Promising findings from a case study. Funct Neurol 29: 139-141
4. Carota A, Bogousslavsky J. (2012). Mood disorders after stroke. Front Neurol Neurosci 30: 70-74
5. Cramer SC, Riley JD. (2008). Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 21: 76-82
6. Cumming TB, Marshall RS, Lazar RM. (2013). Stroke, cognitive deficits, and rehabilitation: still an incomplete picture. Int J Stroke 8: 38-45
7. DAniello GE, Scarpina F, Mauro A, Mori I, Castelnuovo G, Bigoni M, et al. (2014). Characteristics of anxiety and psychological well-being in chronic post-stroke patients. J Neurol Sci 338: 191-196
8. Esquenazi A, Packel A. (2012). Robotic-assisted gait training and restoration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91 (Suppl 3): S217-S227
9. Flaster M, Sharma A, Rao M. (2013). Post-stroke depression: a review emphasizing the role of prophylactic treatment and synergy with treatment for motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 20: 139-150
10. Haring H. (2002). Cognitive impairment after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 15: 79-84
11. Hesse S. (2008). Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 23: 55-65
12. Hesse S, Schattat N, Mehrholz J, Werner C. (2013). Evidence of end-effector based gait machines in gait rehabilitation after CNS lesion. NeuroRehabilitation 33: 77-84
13. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. (2009). Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Rep 23: 5-13
14. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. (2008). Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 39: 1786-1792
15. Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. (2007). Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke 38: 349-354
16. Hussain S. (2014). State-of-the-art robotic gait rehabilitation orthoses: design and control aspects. NeuroRehabilitation 35: 701-709
17. Jezernik S, Colombo G, Keller T, Frueh H, Morari M. (2003). Robotic orthosis Lokomat: a rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation 6: 108-115
18. Kegel J, Dux M, Macko R. (2014). Executive function and coping in stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation 34: 55-63
19. Kelley CP, Childress J, Boake C, Noser EA. (2013). Over-ground and roboticassisted locomotor training in adults with chronic stroke: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 8: 161-168
20. Lazarus R. (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychos Med 55: 234-247
21. Mayer A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Fröhlich K, Saltuari L. (2007). Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Rep 21: 307-314
22. Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. (2013). Electromechanicalassisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7: CD006185
23. Morone G, Bragoni M, Iosa M, de Angelis D, Venturiero V, Coiro P, et al. (2011). Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training?. A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25: 636-644
24. Polese JC, Ada L, Dean CM, Nascimento LR, Teixeira-Salmela LF. (2013). Treadmill training is effective for ambulatory adults with stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother 59: 73-80
25. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org
26. Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, Neeb M, Shochina M, Katz-Leurer M, Meiner Z. (2009). The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R 1: 516-523
27. Swinnen E, Beckwée D, Meeusen R, Baeyens JP, Kerckhofs E. (2014). Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients?. A systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil 21: 87-100
28. Tucker MR, Olivier J, Pagel A, Bleuler H, Bouri M, Lambercy O, et al. (2015). Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12: 1
29. Uçar DE, Paker N, Bugdayci D. (2014). Lokomat: a therapeutic chance for patients with chronic hemiplegia. NeuroRehabilitation 34: 447-453
30. van Nunen MP, Gerrits KH, Konijnenbelt M, Janssen TW, de Haan A. (2015). Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Disabil Rehabil Ass Technol 10: 141-148
31. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van Der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke?. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9: e87987
32. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, de Wit L, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, Devos H, et al. (2008). Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Rep 22: 173-179
33. Volz LJ, Sarfeld AS, Diekhoff S, Rehme AK, Pool EM, Eickhoff SB, et al. (2014). Motor cortex excitability and connectivity in chronic stroke: a multimodal model of functional reorganization. Brain Struct Funct 220: 1093-1097