Dynamic Modelling of Land Use Change Impacts on Nitrate Loads in Rivers

Environmental Processes

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 575-592

  Guse, Björn ^a   Pfannerstill, Matthias ^a   Fohrer, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Catchment modelling; Dynamic land use change; Land use change; Nitrate; SWAT; Water quality modelling

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CROPS; NITRATES; RIVERS; RUNOFF; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER QUALITY;

CALIBRATION AND VALIDATIONS; CATCHMENT MODELLING; ECO-HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; HYDROLOGICAL CATCHMENT MODELS; LAND-USE CHANGE; SWAT; VARIABLE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; WATER QUALITY MODELLING;

LAND USE;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BOUNDARY CONDITION; CATCHMENT; CLIMATE EFFECT; CROP PLANT; ECOHYDROLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND USE CHANGE; NITRATE; NUTRIENT DYNAMICS; RIVER BASIN; RIVER DISCHARGE; RIVER WATER; RURAL AREA; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84939452277     PISSN: 21987491     EISSN: 21987505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40710-015-0099-x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ahmadi M, Ascough JC II, DeJonge K, Arabi M (2014) Multisite-multivariable sensitivity analysis of distributed watershed models: enhancing the perceptions from computationally frugal methods. Ecol Model 279:54-67
2. Arheimer B, Liden R (2000) Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments - influence of spatial and temporal variables. J Hydrol 227:140-159
3. Arnold J, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19:563-572
4. Arnold J, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R, Williams J (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73-89
5. Arnold JG, Gassman PW, White MJ (2010) New developments in the SWAT ecohydrology model. Proceedings of the 21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment, Universidad EARTH Costa Rica
6. Audsley E, Pearn KR, Simota C, Cojocaru G, Koutsidou E, Rounsevell MD, Trnka M, Alexandrov V (2006) What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? Environ Sci Pol 9:148-162
7. Batelis SC, Nalbantis I (2014) Potential effects of forest fires on streamflow in the Enipeas river basin, Thessaly, Greece. Environ Process 1:73-85
8. Behrendt H, Huber P, Ley M, Opitz D, Schmoll O, Scholz G, Uebe R (1999) Naehrstoffbilanzierung der Flussgebiete Deutschlands. UBA-Texte 75/99.
9. BGR (1999) Bodenuebersichtskarte im Massstab 1:200000, Verbreitung der Bodengesellschaften. Bundesanstalt fuer Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover
10. Bieger K, Hoermann G, Fohrer N (2015) The impact of land use change in the Xiangxi catchment (China) on water balance and sediment transport. Reg Environ Chang 15:485-498
11. Cao W, Bowden WB, Davie T, Fenemor A (2006) Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability. Hydrol Process 20:1057-1073
12. Chiang L, Chaubey I, Gitau MW, Arnold JG (2010) Differentiating impacts of land use changes from pasture management in a Ceap watershed using the SWAT model. Trans ASABE 53(5):1569-1584
13. Conradt T, Koch H, Hattermann FF, Wechsung F (2012) Precipitation or evapotranspiration? Bayesian analysis of potential error sources in the simulation of sub-basin discharges in the Czech Elbe River basin. Reg Environ Chang 12:649-661
14. Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007) HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecast. Environ Model Software 22:1034-1052
15. Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K, Frede HG (2001) Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Phys Chem Earth B 26(7-8):577-582
16. Fohrer N, Moeller D, Steiner N (2002) An interdisciplinary modelling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change. Phys Chem Earth 27:655-662
17. Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Frede HG (2005) Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: development of sustainable land use concepts for low mountain range areas. Hydrol Process 19:659-672
18. Fohrer N, Schmalz B, Tavares F, Golon J (2007) Modelling the landscape water balance of mesoscale lowland catchments considering agricultural drainage systems. Hydrol Wasserbewirtsch 51(4):164-169
19. Fohrer N, Dietrich A, Kolychalow O, Ulrich U (2013) Assessment of the environmental fate of the herbicides Flufenacet and Metazachlor with the SWAT model. J Environ Qual. 43(1):75-85. doi: 10.2135/jeq2011.0382
20. Geertz J (2012) Land use scenarios for the river Treene catchment in Northern Germany. Bachelor thesis, Brandenburgische Technische Universitaet Cottbus
21. Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2010) SWAT-simulated hydrological impact of land use change in the Zanjanroud basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrol Process 24(7):892-903
22. Guse B, Bronstert A, Rode M, Tetzlaff B, Wendland F (2007) Application of two phosphorus models with different complexities in a mesoscale river catchment. Adv Geosci 11:77-84
23. Guse B, Reusser DE, Fohrer N (2014) How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment - temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance. Hydrol Process 28:2651-2670. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9777
24. Guse B, Kail J, Radinger J, Schroeder M, Kiesel J, Hering D, Wolter C, Fohrer N (2015) Eco-hydrologic model cascade: Simulating land use and climate change impacts on hydrology, hydraulics and habitats for fish and macroinvertebrates. Sci Total Environ 533:542-556. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.078
25. Haas M, Guse B, Pfannerstill M, Fohrer N (2015) Detection of dominant nitrate processes in eco-hydrological modelling with temporal parameter sensitivity analysis. Ecol Model. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.009
26. Hesse C, Krysanova V, Pazolt J, Hattermann F (2008) Eco-hydrological modelling in a highly regulated lowland catchment to find measures for improving water quality. Ecol Model 218(1-2):135-148
27. Huang S, Hesse C, Krysanova V, Hattermann F (2009) From meso- to macro-scale dynamic water quality modelling for the assessment of land use change scenarios. Ecol Model 220(19):2543-2558
28. Jachner S, van den Boogaart KG, Petzoldt T (2007) Statistical methods for the qualitative assessment of dynamic models with time delay (R package qualv). J Stat Softw 22:1-30
29. Kail J, Guse B, Radinger J, Schroeder M, Kiesel J, Kleinhans M, Schuurman F, Fohrer N, Hering D, Wolter C (2015) A modelling framework to assess the effect of pressures on river abiotic habitat conditions and biota. PLoS One 10(6):e0130228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130228
30. Kiesel J, Fohrer N, Schmalz B, White MJ (2010) Incorporating landscape depressions and tile drainages of lowland catchments into spatially distributed hydrologic modeling. Hydrol Process 24:1472-1486
31. Kloecking B, Haberlandt U (2002) Impact of land use changes on water dynamics - a case study in temperate meso and macroscale river basins. Phys Chem Earth 27:619-629
32. Kloecking B, Stroebl B, Knoblauch S, Maier U, Pfuetzner B, Gericke A (2003) Development and allocation of land-use scenarios in agriculture for hydrological impact studies. Phys Chem Earth 28:1311-1321
33. Lambin EF, Rounsevell MD, Geist HJ (2000) Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agricult Ecosyst Environ 82:321-331
34. LANU S-H (2006) Die Boeden Schleswig-Holsteins. Landesamt fuer Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holsteins, Kiel
35. Laurent F, Ruelland D (2011) Assessing impacts of alternative land use and agricultural practices on nitrate pollution at the catchment scale. J Hydrol 409:440-450
36. Lautenbach S, Volk M, Strauch M, Whittaker G, Seppelt R (2013) Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environ Model Software 48:98-112
37. Legates D, McCabe G Jr (1999) Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233-241
38. Liersch S (2005) Auswirkungen von Landnutzungsaenderungen und umweltgerechten Bewirtschaftungsmethoden auf den Wasser- und Stoffhaushalt des Einzugsgebietes der Ems in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Diplomarbeit, University of Potsdam, Institute for Geoecology
39. LVERMA S-H (2004) Automatisierte Liegenschaftskarte (ALK). Vermessungs- und Katasterverwaltung Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
40. LVERMA S-H (1995) Digitales Hoehenmodell DHM25 (25m x 25m). Land survey office Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
41. Marquardt J (2008) GIS-gestuetzte Untersuchung des Pflanzenanbaus fuer Biogasanlagen und dessen potentieller Auswirkungen auf die Beschaffenheit und den Zustand von Boden und Wasser in Schleswig-Holstein. Diplomarbeit, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Geographie
42. Moriasi DN, Arnold J, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885-900
43. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I - a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282-290
44. Neitsch S, Arnold J, Kiniry J, Williams J (2011) Soil & Water Assessment Tool - Theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report 406, Texas A&M University System
45. Niehoff D, Fritsch U, Bronstert A (2002) Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J Hydrol 267:80-93
46. Oesterle H (2001) Reconstruction of daily global radiation for past years for use in agricultural models. Phys Chem Earth Part B, Hydrol Oceans Atmos 26(3):253-256. doi: 10.1016/S14641909(00)002483
47. Orlowsky B, Gerstengarbe FW, Werner P (2008) A resampling scheme for regional climate simulations and its performance compared to a dynamical RCM. Theor Appl Climatol 92:209-223
48. Pai N, Saraswat D (2011) SWAT2009 LUC: A tool to activate the land use change module in SWAT 2009. Trans ASABE 54(5):1649-1658
49. Panagopoulos Y, Makropoulos C, Baltas E, Mimikou M (2011) SWAT parameterization for the identification of critical diffuse pollution source areas under data limitations. Ecol Model 222:3500-3512
50. Pfannerstill M, Guse B, Fohrer N (2014a) A multi-storage groundwater concept for the SWAT model to emphasize nonlinear groundwater dynamics in lowland catchments. Hydrol Process 28:5599-5612. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10062
51. Pfannerstill M, Guse B, Fohrer N (2014b) Smart low flow signature metrics for an improved overall performance evaluation of hydrological models. J Hydrol 510:447-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.044
52. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna
53. Rekolainen S, Kaemaeri J, Hiltunen M, Saloranta TM (2003) A conceptual framework for identifying the need and role of models in the implementation of the water framework directive. Intl J River Basin Manag 1(4):347-352
54. Richter D (1995) Ergebnisse methodischer Untersuchungen zur Korrektur des systematischen Messfehlers des Hellmann-Niederschlagsmesser. Bericht des Deutschen Wetterdienstes (DWD) 194, Offenbach, DWD.
55. Ronfort C, Souchere V, Martin P, Sebilotte C, Castellazzi MS, Barbottin A, Meynard JM, Laignel B (2011) Methodology for land use change scenario assessment for runoff impacts: a case study in a north-western European Loess belt region (Pays de Caux, France). Catena 86:36-48
56. Salmoral G, Willaarts B, Troch P, Garrido A (2015) Drivers influencing streamflow changes in the Upper Turia basin, Spain. Sci Total Environ 503-504:258-268
57. Soetaert K, Petzoldt T (2010) Inverse modelling, sensitivity and Monte Carlo analysis in R using package FME. J Stat Softw 33:1-28
58. Strauch M, Lima JE, Volk M, Lorz C, Makeschin F (2013) The impact of best management practices on simulated streamflow and sediment load in a Central Brazilian catchment. J Environ Manage 127:S24-S36
59. Sundermann A, Gerhardt M, Kappes H, Haase P (2013) Stressor prioritisation in riverine ecosystems: which environmental factors shape benthic invertebrate assemblage metrics? Ecol Indic 27:83-96
60. Ullrich A, Volk M (2009) Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity. Agric Water Manag 96:1207-1217
61. Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10-23
62. Veldkamp A, Lambin EF (2001) Predicting land-use change. J Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:1-6
63. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A (2001) The role of spatially explicit models in land-use change research: a case study for cropping patterns in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:177-190
64. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A, Rounsevell MD (2006) Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:1-6
65. Verburg P, van Berkel D, van Doorn A, van Eupen M, van den Heiligenberg H (2010) Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landsc Ecol 25:217-232