Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: Development of sustainable land use concepts for low mountain range areas

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 659-672

  Fohrer, N ^a   Haverkamp, S ^b   Frede, H G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b Münchener Rückversicherung ^*  (Germany)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Future land use scenarios; Hydrologic catchment modelling; IOSWAT; Land use change; SWAT G

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CROPS; DEFORESTATION; ECOLOGY; LAND USE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; MESOSCALE CATCHMENTS; RASTER MAPS;

HYDROLOGY;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE CHANGE; MOUNTAIN REGION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER BUDGET;

COMPUTER PROGRAMS; DEFORESTATION; ECOLOGY; FARM CROPS; GRASS LANDS; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; HESSE; WORLD;

EID: 14344259232     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5623     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbot MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connell PE, Rasmussen J. 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Système Hydrologique Européen, 'SHE'. 1: History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 45-59.
2. Arnold JG, Allen PM. 1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illionois watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 176: 54-77.
3. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment. Part 1: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89.
4. Arnold JG, Muttiah RS, Srinivasan R, Allen PM. 2000. Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin. Journal of Hydrology 227: 21-40.
5. Bosch JM, Hewlett JD. 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 55: 3-23.
6. Burch GJ, Bath RK, Moore ID, O'Loughlin EM. 1987. Comparative hydrological behaviour of forested and cleared catchments in Southeastern Australia. Journal of Hydrology 90: 19-42.
7. Calder IR. 1992. Hydrologic effects of land use change. In Handbook of Hydrology, Maidment DR (ed.) McGraw-Hill, Inc: New York, 13.1-13.5.
8. Calder IR, Hall RL, Bastable HG, Gunston HM, Shela O, Chirwa A, Kafundu R. 1995. The impact of land use change on water resources in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study of Lake Malawi. Journal of Hydrology 170: 123-135.
9. DHI. 1994. MIKE11 Short Description. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Hørsholm.
10. Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG. 2000. AVSWAT: An ArcView GIS extension as tool for the watershed control of point and non-point sources. San Diego 2000 ESRI International User Conference, June 26-30.
11. Dunn SM, Mackay R. 1995. Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 171: 49-73.
12. Eckhardt K, Haverkamp S, Fohrer N, Frede HG. 2002. SWAT-G, a modified version of SWAT. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27(9/ 10): 641-644.
13. Eckhardt K, Breuer L, Frede HG. 2003. Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects. Journal of Hydrology 273: 164-176.
14. Ewen J, Parkin G. 1996. Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 1. Method. Journal of Hydrology 175: 583-594.
15. Fohrer N, Eckhardt K, Haverkamp S, Frede HG. 1999. Effects of land use changes on the water balance of a rural watershed in a peripheral region. Journal of Rural Engineering and Development 40(5/ 6): 202-206 (in German).
16. Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K, Frede HG. 2001. Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 26(7/8): 577-582.
17. Fohrer N, Möller D, Steiner N. 2002. An interdisciplinary modelling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27(9/10): 655-662.
18. Garbrecht J, Martz L. 1998. An automated digital landscape analysis tool for topographic evaluation, drainage identification, watershed segmentation and subcatchment parameterization (http://duke.usask.ea/ ~martzi/topaz/index.html; 12 pp).
19. Geisler G. 1983. Ertragsphysiologie von Kulturarten des gemäΒigten Klimas. Verlag Paul Parey: Berlin; 205 p.
20. Haverkamp S, Fohrer N, Frede HG. 2004. Assessment of effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS-based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation. Hydrological Processes (this issue).
21. Hessisches Landesamt für Bodenforschung. 1998. Digitale Bodenflächendaten 1:50 000 des FIS Boden/Bodenschutz, vorläufige Ausgabe.
22. Hibbert AR. 1967. Forest treatment effects on water yield. In International Symposium on Forest Hydrology, Pennsylvania, September 1965, Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds). Pergamon: Oxford.
23. Hookey GR. 1987. Prediction of delays in groundwater response to catchment clearing. Journal of Hydrology 94: 181-198.
24. Klemes V. 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Science Journal 31: 13-24.
25. Krysanova V, Müller-Wohlfeil DI, Becker A. 1998. Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds. Ecological Modelling 160: 261-289.
26. Lahmer W, Pfützner B, Becker A. 1999. Großakalige hydrologische Modellierung vor dem Hintergrund unsicherer Eingangsdaten. In Modellierung des Wasser- und Stofftransports in groΒen Einzugsgebieten Fohrer N, Döll P (eds). Kassel University Press; 153-161.
27. Le Dantec V, Dufrêne E, Saugier B. 2000. Interannual and spatial variation in maximum leaf area index of temperate deciduous stands. Forest Ecology and Management 134: 71-81.
28. Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede HG. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27(9/10): 645-654.
29. Lørup JK, Refsgaard JC, Mazvimavi D. 1998. Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modelling: case studies from Zimbabwe. Journal of Hydrology 205: 147-163.
30. Lyne V, Hollick M. 1979. Stochastic time-variable rainfall-runoff modelling. Australian National Conference Publication 79 10): 89-93.
31. Martin PH. 1998. Land-surface characterization in climate models: biome-based parameter interference is not equivalent to local direct estimation. Journal of Hydrology 212/213(1-4): 287-303.
32. McDonalds MG, Harbaugh AW. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1, 586 pp.
33. Möller D, Kuhlmann F. 1999. ProLand: A new approach to generate and evaluate land use options. IX European Congress of Agricultural Economists, Warsaw, Poland, August 24-28.
34. Möller D, Weinmann B, Kirschner M, Kuhlmann F. 1999. Zur Bedeutung von Umweltauflagen für die räumliche Verteilung land-und forstwirtschaftlicher Nutzungssysteme: GIS-basierte Modellierung mit ProLand. Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus 36: 212-220.
35. Möller D, Fohrer N, Steiner N. 2002. Quantifizierung der regionalen Multifunktionalität land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Nutzungssysteme. Berichte über die Landwirtschaft 80(3): 393-418.
36. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JE. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282-290.
37. Onstad CA, Jamieson DG. 1970. Modelling the effect of land use modifications on runoff. Water Resources Research 6(5): 1287-1295.
38. Peck AJ, Williamson DR. 1987. Effects of forest clearing on groundwater. Journal of Hydrology 94: 47-65.
39. Smith RE, Scott DF. 1992. The effects of afforestation on low flows in various regions of South Africa. Water SA 18(3): 185-194.
40. Sophocleous MA, Koelliker JK, Govindaraju RS, Birdie T, Ramireddygari SR, Perkins SP. 1999. Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. Journal of Hydrology 214: 179-196.
41. Srinivasan R, Arnold JG. 1994. Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS. Water Resources Bulletin 30(3): 453-462.
42. Srinivasan R, Ramanarayanan TS, Arnold JG, Bernarz ST. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part II: Model application. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 91-101.
43. Stednick JD. 1996. Monitoring the effect of timber harvest on annual water yield. Journal of Hydrology 176: 79-95.
44. USDA-SCS. 1972. National Engineering Handbook, Hydrology Section 4, Chapters 4-10.
45. Van Rompaey AJJ, Govers G, Van Hecke E, Jakobs K. 2001. The impacts of land use policy on the soil erosion risk: a case study in central Belgium. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 83: 83-94.
46. Weber A, Fohrer N, Möller D. 2001. Long-term changes of land use in a mesoscale watershed due to socio-economic factors-effects on landscape functions. Ecological Modelling 140(1/2): 125-140.
47. Weinschenck G, Henrichsmeyer W. 1966. Zur Theorie und Ermittlung des räumlichen Gleichgewichts der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 44: 201-242.
48. Williams JR, Renard KG, Dyke PIT. 1983. EPIC-A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 38(5): 381-383.
49. Williams JR, Rose SC, Harris GL. 1995. The impact on hydrology and water quality of woodland and set-aside establishment on lowland clay soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 54: 215-222.