Multisite-multivariable sensitivity analysis of distributed watershed models: Enhancing the perceptions from computationally frugal methods

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 279, Issue , 2014, Pages 54-67

  Ahmadi, Mehdi ^a   Ascough, James C ^b   DeJonge, Kendall C ^b   Arabi, Mazdak ^a  

^a Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Formal likelihood function; Hydrology; Morris sensitivity analysis; SWAT model; Water quality

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; GAGES; HYDROLOGY; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; STREAM FLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SENSITIVITY OF PARAMETERS; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SPEARMAN'S RANK CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; SWAT MODEL;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION; MASS BALANCE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAMFLOW; WATER QUALITY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84896032264     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ahmadi M. A multi criteria decision support system for watershed management under uncertain conditions 2012, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation).
2. Ahmadi M., Records R., Arabi M. Impact of climate change on diffuse pollutant fluxes at the watershed scale. Hydrologic Processes 2014, 28:1962-1972. 10.1002/hyp.9723.
3. Ajami N.K., Duan Q., Sorooshian S. An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(1). 10.1029/2005WR004745.
4. Arabi M., Govindaraju R.S., Engel B.A., Hantush M.M. Multiobjective sensitivity analysis of sediment and nitrogen processes with a watershed model. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(6). 10.1029/2006WR005463.
5. Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Srinivasan R., Williams J.R., Haney E.B., Neitsch S.L. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation, Version 2009, Report No. 365 2012, Technical report, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX.
6. Aronica G., Hankin B., Beven K. Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data. Advances in Water Resources 1998, 22(4):349-365. 10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00017-7.
7. ASCE Criteria for evaluation of watershed models, ASCE task committee on definition of criteria for evaluation of watershed models of the watershed management, irrigation, and drainage division. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 1993, 119(3):429.
8. Beven K., Binley A. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 1992, 6(3):279-298. 10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
9. Beven K., Freer J. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology 2001, 249(1-4):11-29. 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8.
10. Bouraoui F., Galbiati L., Bidoglio G. Climate change impacts on nutrient loads in the Yorkshire Ouse catchment (UK). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2002, 6:197-209. 10.5194/hess-6-197-2002.
11. Box G.E.P., Cox D. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1964, 26:1-78.
12. Box G.E.P., Tiao G.C. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis 1992, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
13. Box G.E.P., Jenkins G.M., Reinsel G.C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 4th ed.
14. Brockmann D., Morgenroth E. Comparing global sensitivity analysis for a biofilm model for two-step nitrification using the qualitative screening method of Morris or the quantitative variance-based Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Water Science and Technology 2007, 56(8):85-93.
15. Brown L.C., Barnwell T.O. The enhanced water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS documentation and user manual. Technical report, EPA document EPA/600/3-87/007 1987, USEPA, Athens, GA.
16. Cacuci D.G. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis, Volume I: Theory 2003, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
17. Cacuci D.G., Ionescu-bujor M. A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems. II: Statistical methods. Nuclear Science and Engineering 2004, 147(3):204-217.
18. Campolongo F., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1997, 57(1):49-69. 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00021-5.
19. Campolongo F., Braddock R. Sensitivity analysis of the IMAGE Greenhouse model. Environmental Modelling & Software 1999, 14(4):275-282. 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00079-6.
20. Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22(10):1509-1518. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004.
21. Cibin R., Sudheer K.P., Chaubey I. Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrological Processes 2010, 24(9):1133-1148. 10.1002/hyp.7568.
22. Ciric C., Ciffroy P., Charles S. Use of sensitivity analysis to identify influential and non-influential parameters within an aquatic ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling 2012, 246:119-130. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.024.
23. Confalonieri R., Bellocchi G., Donatelli M. A software component to compute agro-meteorological indicators. Environmental Modelling and Software 2010, 25(11):1485-1486. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.007.
24. Cotter A.S., Chaubey I., Costello T.A., Soerens T.S., Nelson M.A. Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2003, 39(4):977-986. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04420.x.
25. DeJonge K.C., Ascough J.C., Ahmadi M., Andales A.A., Arabi M. Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a dynamic agroecosystem model under different irrigation treatments. Ecological Modelling 2012, 231:113-125. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.024.
26. DiToro D. Statistical methods for estimating and evaluating the uncertainty of water quality model parameters and predictions 1984, Technical report, Manhattan College, Prepared for the Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, The Netherlands, Bronx, NY.
27. Duan Q., Gupta V.K., Sorooshian S. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 1993, 76(3):501-521. 10.1007/BF00939380.
28. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics 1979, 7(1):1-26.
29. Fenicia F., Savenije H.H.G., Matgen P., Pfister L. A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(3). 10.1029/2006WR005098.
30. Feyereisen G., Strickland T., Bosch D. Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the Little River Watershed. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50:843-856.
31. Foglia L., Hill M.C., Mehl S.W., Burlando P. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and testing of a distributed hydrological model using error-based weighting and one objective function. Water Resources Research 2009, 45(6). 10.1029/2008WR007255.
32. Francos A., Elorza F., Bouraoui F., Bidoglio G., Galbiati L. Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2003, 79(2):205-218. 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00231-4.
33. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Yapo P.O. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 1999, 4(2):135-143. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135).
34. Haan C.T., Storm D.E., Al-Issa T., Prabhu S., Sabbagh G.J., Edwards D.R. Effect of parameter distributions on uncertainty analysis of hydrologic models. Transactions of the ASAE 1998, 41(1):65-70.
35. Hall J.W., Boyce S.A., Wang Y., Dawson R.J., Tarantola S., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2009, 135(11):959. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000098.
36. He J., Jones J.W., Graham W.D., Dukes M.D. Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Agricultural Systems 2010, 103(5):256-264. 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.01.006.
37. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models of complex systems. Computational Methods in Transport: Verification and Validation, Volume 62 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 2008, 207-228. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. F. Graziani (Ed.).
38. Holvoet K., van Griensven A., Seuntjens P., Vanrolleghem P. Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 2005, 30(8-10):518-526. 10.1016/j.pce.2005.07.006.
39. Huang Y., Liu L. A hybrid perturbation and Morris approach for identifying sensitive parameters in surface water quality models. Journal of Environmental Informatics 2008, 12(2):150-159. 10.3808/jei.200800133.
40. Iman R.L., Conover W.J. A measure of top-down correlation. Technometrics 1987, 29(3):351.
41. King D., Perera B. Morris method of sensitivity analysis applied to assess the importance of input variables on urban water supply yield - a case study. Journal of Hydrology 2013, 477:17-32. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.017.
42. Kuczera G., Parent E. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. Journal of Hydrology 1998, 211(1-4):69-85. 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X.
43. Madsen H. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology 2000, 235(3-4):276-288. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1.
44. Madsen H. Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Advances in Water Resources 2003, 26(2):205-216. 10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1.
45. Mantovan P., Todini E. Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 330(1-2):368-381. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.046.
46. Monod H., Naud C., Makowski D. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for crop models. Working with Dynamic Crop Models 2006, 55-100. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. D. Wallach, D. Makowski, J. Jones (Eds.).
47. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
48. Morris M. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991, 33(2):161-174.
49. Muleta M.K., Nicklow J.W. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 306(1-4):127-145. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.005.
50. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10(3):282-290. 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
51. Nossent J., Elsen P., Bauwens W. Sobol sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(12):1515-1525. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010.
52. Pappenberger F., Beven K.J., Ratto M., Matgen P. Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models. Advances in Water Resources 2008, 31(1):1-14. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009.
53. Runkel R., Crawford C., Cohn T. Load estimator (LOADEST): a FORTRAN program for estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 4 2004, 69. U.S. Geological Survey, (Chapter A5).
54. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Chan K.P.-S. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 1999, 41(1):39.
55. Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis 2000, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
56. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F., Ratto M. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models 2004, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., West Sussex UK. 1st ed.
57. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Tarantola S., Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006, 91(10-11):1109-1125. 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.014.
58. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer 2008, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
59. Shen Z., Hong Q., Yu H., Liu R. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Science of the Total Environment 2008, 405(1-3):195-205. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.009.
60. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. Statistical Methods 1989, 503. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
61. Sorooshian S., Dracup J.A. Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologie rainfall-runoff models: correlated and heteroscedastic error cases. Water Resources Research 1980, 16(2):430-442. 10.1029/WR016i002p00430.
62. Stedinger J.R., Vogel R.M., Lee S.U., Batchelder R. Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. Water Resources Research 2008, 44. 10.1029/2008WR006822.
63. Sun X., Newham L., Croke B., Norton J. Three complementary methods for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 37:19-29. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.010.
64. Taguas E.V., Ayuso J.L., Peña A., Yuan Y., Pérez R. Evaluating and modelling the hydrological and erosive behaviour of an olive orchard microcatchment under no-tillage with bare soil in Spain. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2009, 34:738-751. 10.1002/esp.1775.
65. Tedesco L.P., Shrake L.K., Casey L.R., Hall B.E., Vidon P.G.F., Hernly F.V., Barr R.C., Ulmer J., Pascual D.L. Eagle Creek Watershed Alliance An Integrated Approach to Improved Water Quality 2005, Eagle Creek Watershed Alliance, CEES Publication 2005-07, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN.
66. US EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Modeling 2002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
67. USDA NASS USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer 2003, United States Department of Agriculture.
68. USDA NRCS Soil Data Mart 2010, (accessed September 2012). http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/.
69. USGS Land Cover Data (NLCD) 1992/2001, (accessed September 2012). http://seamless.usgs.gov/.
70. USGS NED 1 arc Second Digital Elevation Model 2010, (accessed September 2010). http://seamless.usgs.gov/.
71. van Delden H., Seppelt R., White R., Jakeman A. A methodology for the design and development of integrated models for policy support. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(3):266-279. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.021.
72. van Griensven A., Bauwens W. Multiobjective autocalibration for semidistributed water quality models. Water Resources Research 2003, 39(12). 10.1029/2003WR002284.
73. van Griensven A., Meixner T. A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models. Journal of Hydroinformatics 2007, 9(4):277-291.
74. van Griensven A., Francos A., Bauwens W. Sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. Water Science and Technology 2002, 45(9):325-332.
75. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Srinivasan R., Grunwald S. Fit-for-purpose analysis of uncertainty using split-sampling evaluations. Hydrological Sciences 2008, 53(5):1090-1103. 10.1623/hysj.53.5.1090.
76. van Straten G. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters and uncertainty in phytoplankton models. Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality 1983, 157-171. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. M.B. Beck, G. van Straten (Eds.).
77. van Werkhoven K., Wagener T., Reed P.M., Tang Y. Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient. Water Resources Research 2008, 44(1). 10.1029/2007WR006271.
78. Vrugt J.A., Braak C.J.F., Diks C., Robinson B., Hyman J., Higdon D. Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 2009, 10(3):273-290.
79. Wagener T., van Werkhoven K., Reed P.M., Tang Y. Multiobjective sensitivity analysis to understand the information content in streamflow observations for distributed watershed modeling. Water Resources Research 2009, 45(2). 10.1029/2008WR007347.
80. Wang S., Zhang Z., Sun G., Strauss P., Guo J., Tang Y., Yao A. Multi-site calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE SHE Model for a large watershed in northern China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2012, 16(12):4621-4632. 10.5194/hess-16-4621-2012.
81. White K.L., Chaubey I. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2005, 41(5):1077-1089. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03786.x.
82. Yeo I.-K., Johnson R.A. A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika 2000, 87(4):954-959.
83. Zak S.K., Beven K., Reynolds B. Uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads: a practical methodology. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 1997, 98(3-4):297-316.
84. Zhan C.S., Song X.M., Xia J., Tong C. An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters. Environmental Modelling and Software 2013, 41:39-52. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.009.