Lessons Learned from the Study of Multi-organizational Collaborations in Science and Implications for the Role of the University in the 21st Century

Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science

Volumn 302, Issue , 2014, Pages 167-184

  Chompalov, Ivan ^a  

^a EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometric Study; Collaborative Project; Oral History Interview; Scientific Collaboration; Triple Helix Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939293536     PISSN: 00680346     EISSN: 22147942     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7407-0_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. American Institute of Physics. 1992. AIP study of multi-institutional collaborations. Phase I: High-energy physics, Technical report, College Park, MD.
2. American Institute of Physics. 1995. AIP study of multi-institutional collaborations. Phase II: Space science and geophysics, Technical report, College Park, MD.
3. American Institute of Physics. 1999. AIP study of multi-institutional collaborations. Phase III: Ground-based astronomy, materials science, heavy-ion physics, medical physics, and computer-mediated collaborations, Technical report, College Park, MD.
4. Chompalov, I., J. Genuth, and W. Shrum. 2002. The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy 31: 749–767.
5. Collins, H. 1998. The meaning of data: open and closed evidential cultures in the search for gravitational waves. American Journal of Sociology 104: 293–338.
6. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy (Febru-ary), 29.
7. Galison, P. 1997. Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Galison, P. L., and B. Hevly, eds. 1992. Big science: the growth of large scale research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Krige, J. 1993. Some socio-historical aspects of multi-national collaborations in high-energy physics at CERN between 1975 and 1985. In Denationalizing science: the contexts of international scientific practice, ed. E. Crawford. Berlin: Springer.
11. Kundra, R. 1996. Investigation of collaborative research trends in Indian medical sciences: 1900– 1945. Scientometrics 36: 69–80.
12. Leydesdorff, L. 2005. The Triple Helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 42: 1–16.
13. Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1996. Emergence of a Triple-Helix of industry-university-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23: 279–286.
14. Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1998. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy 25: 195–203.
15. Luukkonen, T., R. Tijssen, O. Persson, and G. Sivertsen. 1993. The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 28: 15–36.
16. Mazur, A., and E. Boyko. 1981. Large-scale ocean research projects: what makes them succeed or fail? Social Studies of Science 11: 425–449.
17. Rogers, J. D., and B. Bozeman. 2001. Knowledge value alliances: an alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26: 23–55.
18. Shrum, W., J. Genuth, and I. Chompalov. 2007. Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Tatarewicz, J. N. 1990. Space technology and planetary astronomy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20. Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Zabusky, S. E. 1995. Launching Europe: an ethnography of European cooperation in space science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.