Human creativity, evolutionary algorithms, and predictive representations: The mechanics of thought trials

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 897-915

  Dietrich, Arne ^a   Haider, Hilde ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aha effect; Consciousness; Creativity; Emulation; Evolutionary algorithms; Fitness function; Heuristics; Idea; Insight; Prediction; Selection; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; COGNITION; CREATIVITY; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; THINKING;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; CREATIVITY; HUMANS; INTENTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; THINKING;

EID: 84938893560     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0743-x     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thoughts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214, 143–156. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015
4. Ashby, G. F., & Casale, M. B. (2002). The cognitive neuroscience of implicit category learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and Implicit Learning (pp. 109–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
5. Atance, C. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 533–539. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0
6. Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Liew, S. L. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affect Neuroscience, 8, 475–480. doi:10.1093/scan/nss021
7. Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Baker, S. C., Rogers, R. D., Owen, A. M., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1996). Neural systems engaged in planning: A PET study of the Tower of London task. Neuropsychologia, 34, 515–526.
9. Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 280–289. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
10. Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1235–1243. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0310
11. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281–1289. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0016
12. Blakemore, S.-J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567. doi:10.1177/0956797612444612
13. Blakemore, S. J., Smith, J., Steel, R., Johnstone, E. C., & Frith, C. D. (2000). The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: Evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychological Medicine, 30, 1131–1139. doi:10.1017/S0033291799002676
14. Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C. G., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72–110.
15. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Bubic, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025
17. Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004
18. Calvin, W. H. (1987). The brain as a darwinian machine. Nature, 330, 33–34.
19. Calvin, W. H. (2007). Why a creative brain? Evolutionary setups for off-line planning of coherent stages. In H. Cohen & B. Stemmer (Eds.), Consciousness and cognition: Fragments of mind and brain (pp. 115–126). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
21. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Unjustified variation and selective retention in scientific discovery. In F. Ayala & T. Dobszhansky (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology: Reduction and related problems (pp. 139–161). London: Macmillan.
22. Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 13–38.
23. Cisek, P. (2006). Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9761–9770. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5605-05.2006
24. Cleeremans, A. (2008). The radical plasticity thesis. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 19–33. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00086
25. Colder, B. (2011). Emulation as an integrating principle for cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.0005
26. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
27. Corallo, G., Sackur, J., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2008). Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck. Psychological Science, 19, 1110–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02211.x
28. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
29. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 119–126. doi:10.1038/nn0203-119
30. Dagher, A., Owen, A. M., Boecker, H., & Brooks, D. J. (1999). Mapping the network for planning: A PET activation study with the Tower of London task. Brain, 122, 1973–1987. doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1973
31. Dasgupta, S. (2004). Is creativity a Darwinian process? Creativity Research Journal, 16, 403–413.
32. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
33. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s’ dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34. Dennett, D. C. (2004). Could there be a Darwinian account of human creativity? In A. Moya & E. Font (Eds.), Evolution, From Molecules to Ecosystems (pp. 273–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Diedrichsen, J., Verstynen, T., Hon, A., Zhang, Y., & Ivry, R. B. (2007). Illusions of force perception: The role of sensori-motor predictions, visual information, and motor errors. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3305–3313. doi:10.1152/jn.01076.2006
36. Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 735–808.
37. Dietrich, A. (2004a). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 746–761. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.002
38. Dietrich, A. (2004b). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011–1026. doi:10.3758/BF03196731
39. Dietrich, A. (2007). Who is afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity? Methods, 42, 22–27. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.00
40. Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848. doi:10.1037/a0019749
41. Downing, K. L. (2009). Predictive models in the brain. Connection Science, 21, 39–74. doi:10.1080/09540090802610666
42. Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59, 1783–1794.
43. Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.
44. Fisher, J. C. (2006). Does simulation theory really involve simulation? Philosophical Psychology, 19, 417–432. doi:10.1080/09515080600726377
45. Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-energy and the brain. Synthese, 159, 417–458. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y
46. Frith, C. D. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Gansler, D. A., Moore, D. W., Susmaras, T. M., & Jerram, M. W. (2011). Cortical morphology of visual creativity. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2527–2532. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839321100234X.
48. Geary, D. C., & Huffman, K. J. (2002). Brain and cognitive evolution: Forms of modularity and function of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 667–698. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.667
49. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
51. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
52. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313
53. Gluck, M., & Myers, C. (1989). Gateway to learning: An introduction to neural network modeling of the hippocampus and learning. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Goldman, A. (1995). Interpretation psychologized. In M. Davis & T. Stone (Eds.), Folk Psychology: The theory of mind debate (pp. 74–99). Cambridge: Blackwell.
55. Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J. M., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 264–272. doi:10.1037/a0025764
56. Gross, H., Heinze, A., Seiler, T., & Stephan, V. (1999). Generative character of perception: A neural architecture for sensorimotor anticipation. Neural Networks, 12, 1101–1129. doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(99)00047-7
57. Grush, R. (1997). The architecture of representation. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 5–23.
58. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–396. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000093
59. Haider, H., Eichler, A., & Lange, T. (2011). An old problem: How can we distinguish between conscious and unconscious knowledge acquired in an implicit learning task. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 658–672. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.021
60. Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2009). The construction system of the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1263–1271. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0296
61. Hawkins, J. (2004). On intelligence. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
62. Helie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117, 994–1024. doi:10.1037/a001953
63. Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 242–247. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01913-7
64. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–708. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679j
65. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
66. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
67. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
68. Houk, J., Adams, J., & Barto, A. (1995). A model of how the basal ganglia generate and use neural signals that predict reinforcement. In J. Houk, J. Davis, & D. Beiser (Eds.), Models of information processing in the basal ganglia (pp. 249–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Humphrey, N. (2002). The mind made flesh: Frontiers of psychology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Ingold, T. (2000). The poverty of selectionism. Anthropology Today, 16, 1–2. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.00022
71. Ingold, T. (2007). The trouble with 'evolutionary biology'. Anthropology Today, 23, 13–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00497.x
72. James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
73. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Tackling creativity at its roots: Evidence for different patterns of EEG α activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing. International Journal of Psychphysiology, 84(2), 219–225. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.012
74. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2009). “If” and the problem of conditional reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 282–287. doi:10.1016/j.tics.209.04.003
75. Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J., & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 330.
76. Kawato, M., & Wolpert, D. (1998). Internal models for motor control. Sensory Guidance of Movement, 218, 291–307. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8
77. Kent, C., & Lamberts, K. (2008). The encoding–retrieval relationship: retrieval as mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 92–98. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.004
78. Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. (2008). The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12224–12230.
79. Köhler, I. (1951). Über Aufbau und Wandlungen der Wahrnehmungswelt. Insbesondere über bedingte Empfindungen. Wien: Rohrer.
80. Kronfeldner, M. E. (2010). Darwinian “blind” hypothesis formation revisited. Synthese, 175, 193–218. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9498
81. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
82. Lau, H. (2008). A higher order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness. In R. Banerjee & B.K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Progress in Brain Science, 168, 37-48.
83. Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18.
84. Llinás, R. R. (2001). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. Boston: MIT Press.
85. Llinás, R. R., & Roy, S. (2009). The ‘prediction imperative’ as the basis for self-awareness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1301–1307. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0309
86. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational approach. San Fransisco, CA: Freeman & Company.
87. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.
88. Martindale, C. (1999). Darwinian, Lamarckian, and rational creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 340–341.
89. Mehta, B., & Schaal, S. (2002). Forward models in visuomotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 942–953.
90. Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 29, 329–383. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06009083
91. Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274. doi:10.1023/A:1024422330338
92. Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W. (1887). On the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous ether. American Journal of Science, 34, 333–345.
93. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
94. Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: Mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1273–1280. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314
95. Mumford, M. D. (1999). Blind variation or selective variation? Evaluative elements in creative thought. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 344–348.
96. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
97. O’Reagan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.
98. Perkins, D. N. (1994). Creativity: Beyond the Darwinian paradigm. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Perruchet, P., Cleeremans, A., & Destrebecqz, A. (2006). Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 955–965.
100. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.955
101. Pezzulo, G., Butz, M. V., Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (Eds.). (2008). Anticipation in natural and artificial cognition. In G. Pezzulo, M. Butz, C. Castelfranchi, The challenge of anticipation: A unifying framework for the analysis and design of artificial cognitive systems, (pp.3-22). New York: Springer.
102. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate. New York: Penguin.
103. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
104. Popper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary theory of knowledge. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 1059–1065). LaSalle: Open Court.
105. Popper, K. R. (1984). Evolutionary Epistemology. In J. W. Pollard (Ed.), Evolutionary theory: Paths into the future (pp. 239–255). New York: Wiley.
106. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heur & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
108. Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). Blind spots. Scientific American, 266, 86–91.
109. Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 79–87. doi:10.1038/4580
110. Read, D. W. (2006). Cultural evolution is not equivalent to Darwinian evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 361. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0638908X
111. Reber, A. S. (1996). Implicit leaning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112. Reed, C. L., & Farah, M. J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 334–343. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.334
113. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
114. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
115. Rosenthal, D. (2005). Consciousness and Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
116. Russ, S. W. (1999). An evolutionary model for creativity: Does it fit? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 359–361.
117. Ruz, M., & Lupiáñez Castillo, J. (2002). A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología y Psicología Experimental, 23, 283–310.
118. Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137–154.
119. Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 773–786. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087
120. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). On the relationship among priming, conscious recollection, and intentional retrieval: Evidence from neuroimaging research. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 70, 284–303.
121. Schooler, J. W., & Dougal, S. (1999). Why creativity is not like the proverbial typing monkey. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 351–356.
122. Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 211–218. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.006
123. Schultz, W. (2000). Multiple reward signals in the brain. Neuroscience, 1, 199–207. doi:10.1038/35044563
124. Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit Learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition (pp. 202–220). London: Sage Publication.
125. Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied research program. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 338–346. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x
126. Shen, W. B., Liu, C., & Chen, J. J. (2010). Neural basis of creativity: Evidence from structural and functional imaging. Advances in Psychological Science. Retrieved from: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201009009.htm
127. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974. doi:10.1037/a0020541
128. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst – sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074. doi:10.1068/p2952
129. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
130. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328.
131. Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of process and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.
132. Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329–344. doi:10.1080/10400410701753291
133. Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94–120. doi:10.1037/a0014212
134. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159–176. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00813.x
135. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Darwinian creativity as a conventional religious faith. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 357–359.
136. Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y., Nagase, T., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2011). Failing to deactivate: The association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity. NeuroImage, 55(2), 681–687. doi:10.1016/j
137. Taylor, S. F., Stern, E. R., & Gehring, W. J. (2007). Neural systems for error monitoring: Recent findings and theoretical perspectives. The Neuroscientist, 13, 162–172. doi:10.1177/1073858406298184
138. Tennebaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279–1285. doi:10.1126/science.1192788
139. Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2009). Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 719–723.
140. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
141. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity, (pp. 189-212). Cambridge University Press.
142. Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 65–69. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0
143. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 96–115.
144. Wilbert, J., & Haider, H. (2010). The subjective experience of committed errors and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 139, 370–381. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.010
145. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory Cognition, 27, 561–572. doi:10.3758/BF03211549
146. Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognitive Science, 4, 1–12.
147. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 358, 593–602. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1238
148. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1228.
149. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882. doi:10.1126/science.7569931