Does simulation theory really involve simulation?

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 417-432

  Fisher, Justin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Folk Psychology; Mental State Attribution; Mindreading; Simulation Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746233272     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: 1465394X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080600726377     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Davies, M., & Stone, T. (1995). Introduction. In M. Davies & T. Stone (Eds.), Folk psychology: The theory of mind debate (pp. 1-44). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
2. Goldman, A. (1995). Interpretation psychologized. In M. Davies & T. Stone (Eds.), Folk psychology: The theory of mind debate (pp. 74-99). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
3. Goldman, A. (2003). Conceptual clarification and empirical defense of the simulation theory of mindreading. In C. Kanzian, J. Quitterer, & E. Runggaldier (Eds.), Persons: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 141-155). Vienna, Austria: oebv-hpt.
4. Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Gordon, R. M. (1995). The simulation theory: Objections and misconceptions. In M. Davies & T. Stone (Eds.), Folk psychology: The theory of mind debate (pp. 100-122). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
6. Heal, J. (1995). How to think about thinking. In M. Davies & T. Stone (Eds.), Mental simulation (pp. 33-52). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
7. Lewis, D. (1984). Putnam's paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 221-236.
8. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Putnam, H. (1983). Models and reality. In Realism and reason (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1977)
10. Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 66-76.