Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics: The Ministry of Forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the One Map Policy in Indonesia

Land Use Policy

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 131-141

  Wibowo, Agung ^a,b   Giessen, Lukas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALANGKA RAYA   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Bureaucratic politics; International influences; Norway Indonesia LoI; Power theory; REDD+ Programme; The Ministry of Forestry

Indexed keywords

BUREAUCRACY; DEFORESTATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLITICAL POWER;

INDONESIA; NORWAY;

EID: 84938697116     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Aurenhammer P. Development Cooperation Policy in Forestry from an Analytical Perspective 2012, 13. Springer Science & Business Media.
2. Aurenhammer P.K. European States' Bilateral Foreign Aid Policy in Forestry, a Policy Field Analyses of Austrian, Finnish, German and Swedish Forestry Aid, with Emphasis on Program Formulation and Implementation 2011, Thesis (PhD), University of Goettingen.
3. Bachrach P., Baratz M.S. Two faces of power. APSR 1962, 56(04):947-952.
4. Barr C. Forest administration and forestry sector development prior to 1998. Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods 2006, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. C. Barr, I.A.P. Resosudarmo, A. Dermawan, J. McCarthy (Eds.).
5. Bennett R., Rajabifard A., Williamson I., Wallace J. On the need for national land administration infrastructures. Land Use Policy 2012, 29(1):208-219.
6. Bennett R., Tambuwala N., Rajabifard A., Wallace J., Williamson I. On recognizing land administration as critical, public good infrastructure. Land Use Policy 2013, 30(1):84-93.
7. Bernstein S., Cashore B. Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. Int. Aff. 2012, 88(3):585-604.
8. Biermann F. Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2(4):284-288.
9. Biermann F., Siebenhüner B., Bauer S., Busch P.O., Campe S., Dingwerth K., Tarradell M. Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: a conceptual framework. Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies 2009, 37-76. F. Biermann, B. Siebenhüner (Eds.).
10. Global environmental governance reconsidered 2012, MIT Press. F. Biermann, P.H. Pattberg (Eds.).
11. Blais A., Dion S. Are bureaucrats budget maximizers? The Niskanen model & its critics. Polity 1990, 655-674.
12. Boussaguet L. Participatory mechanisms as symbolic policy instruments?. Comp. Eur. Polit. 2015, 10.1057/cep.2015.12.
13. Briassoulis H. Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems - The Example of Mediterranean Desertification 2005, Ashgate, Burlington.
14. Brockhaus M., Di Gregorio M., Mardiah S. Governing the design of national REDD+: an analysis of the power of agency. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 49:23-33.
15. Brockhaus M., Obidzinski K., Dermawan A., Laumonier Y., Luttrell C. An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 18:30-37.
16. Brown D.W. Addicted to rent: corporate and spatial distribution of forest resources in indonesia: implications for forest sustainability and government policy. Indonesia-UK Tropical Forest Management Programme, Provincial Forest Management Programme 1999.
17. Brown D.W. Secrecy in the Indonesian forest products sector: a researcher's experience. The State of the Forest: Indonesia 2002, 79-80. Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia, and Global Forest Watch, Washington DC. F.W. Indonesia, G.F. Watch (Eds.).
18. Buijs A., Mattijssen T., Arts B. The man, the administration and the counter-discourse: an analysis of the sudden turn in Dutch nature conservation policy. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:676-684.
19. Burns S., Giessen L. Dismantling comprehensive forest bureaucracies: direct access, the World Bank, agricultural interests, and neoliberal administrative reform of forest policy in Argentina. Soc. Nat. Res. 2015, (forthcoming).
20. Casson A., Obidzinski K. From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of illegal logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Illegal Logging: Law Enforcement, Livelihoods and the Timber Trade 2007, 43-68.
21. Dahl R.A. The concept of power. Behav. Sci. 1957, 2(3):201-215.
22. Devkota R.R. Interests and Power as Drivers Of Community Forestry: A Case Study of Nepal 2010, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
23. Dermawan A., Dermawan A., Petkova E., Sinaga A.C., Muhajir M., Indriatmoko Y. Preventing the Risks of Corruption in REDD+ in Indonesia 2011, CIFOR, Bogor.
24. Edelman M. The language of participation and the language of resistance. Hum. Commun. Res. 1977, 3(2):159-170.
25. Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report 2010, FAO, Rome.
26. Fay C., Michon G. Redressing forestry hegemony when a forestry regulatory framework is best replaced by an agrarian one. Forests Trees Livelihoods 2005, 15(2):193-209.
27. Galudra G., Sirait M. A discourse on Dutch colonial forest policy and science in Indonesia at the beginning of the 20th century. Int. For. Rev. 2009, 11(4):524-533.
28. Gellert P.K. Rival transnational networks, domestic politics and Indonesian timber. J. Contemp. Asia 2010, 40(4):539-567.
29. Gellert P.K. Extractive regimes: toward a better understanding of Indonesian development. Rural Sociol. 2010, 75(1):28-57.
30. Giessen L. Regional Forest Governence-Potentials for Forestry and Political Drivers in Integrated Rural Development Policy 2010, 313. Goettingen University Press.
31. Giessen L., Krott M. Forestry joining integrated programs? A question of willingness, ability and opportunities. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 2009, 180(5/6):94-100.
32. Giessen L. Reviewing empirical explanations of policy change: options for its analysis and future fields of research. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 2011, 182(11/12):248-259.
33. Giessen L. Temporary governance and persistent government - rural policy integration in pilot and mainstream funding programmes. Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness 2012, 155-177. Edward Elgar. K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, M. Pregernig (Eds.).
34. Giessen L. Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. Int. For. Rev. 2013, 15(1):60-70.
35. Giessen L., Hubo C., Krott M., Kaufer R. Steuerungspotentiale von Zielen und Instrumenten des Politiksektors Forstwirtschaft und deren möglicher Beitrag zu einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung ländlicher Regionen. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 2013, 36(3):261-291.
36. Giessen L., Krott M., Möllmann T. Increasing representation of states by utilitarian as compared to environmental bureaucracies in international forest and forest - environmental policy negotiations. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 38:97-104.
37. Gillespie A., Michelson M.R. Participant observation and the political scientist: possibilities, priorities, and practicalities. Polit. Sci. Polit. 2011, 44(02):261-265.
38. Hansen M.C., Stehman S.V., Potapov P.V., Arunarwati B., Stolle F., Pittman K. Quantifying changes in the rates of forest clearing in Indonesia from 1990 to 2005 using remotely sensed data sets. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4(3):034001. 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034001.
39. Hapsari M. The Political Economy of Forest Governance in Post-Suharto Indonesia 2011, Available at: http://www2.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/blog/anda/files/2012/01/3maharani-hapsari1.pdf (accessed 15.03.14).
40. Harris N.L., Brown S., Hagen S.C., Saatchi S.S., Petrova S., Salas W., Lotsch A. Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 2012, 336(6088):1573-1576.
41. Halas M. Relative and absolute gains problem in international relations. East European Doctoral Student Conference 2008, 375-385. South-East European Research Centre. I. Paraskakis, A. Luneski (Eds.).
42. Hasanagas N.D. Managing information in forest policy networks: distinguishing the influential actors from the "postmen". For. Policy Econ. 2014, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.007.
43. Haugaard M. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. J. Polit. Power 2012, 5(1):33-54.
44. Hogl K., Nordbeck R., Kvarda E. When international impulses hit home: the role of domestic policy subsystem configurations in explaining different types of sustainability strategies. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11(5):357-364.
45. Howlett M., Ramesh M. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems 1995, Oxford University Press, Toronto. 2nd ed.
46. Hubo C., Krott M. Conflict camouflaging in public administration - a case study in nature conservation policy in Lower Saxony. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 33:63-70.
47. Indonesia Corruption Watch [ICW] Forestry Corruption Cases Under KPK. 2013, Available at: http://www.antikorupsi.org/sites/antikorupsi.org/files/doc/Umum/Lampiran%20Data%20ICW%20%20Catatan%20Kejahatan%20Kehutanan,%20Kinerja%20KPK,%20Daftar%20Kasus.pdf (accessed 4.04.14).
48. Irawan S., Tacconi L., Ring I. Designing intergovernmental fiscal transfers for conservation: the case of REDD+ revenue distribution to local governments in Indonesia. Land Use Policy 2014, 36:47-59.
49. Juerges N., Newig J. How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU: a case study from Germany. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 50:228-235.
50. Kaoneka A.R. Asia-Pacific forests, societies and environments. World Forests Society and Environment 1999, 178-185. Springer, Netherlands. M. Palo, J. Uusivuori (Eds.).
51. Kartodihardjo H., Nagara G. Kajian kerentanan korupsi dalam sistem perizinan di sektor sumberdaya alam (SDA): Studi kasus sektor kehutanan. Penelitian sebagai pelaksanaan program litbang KPK. Presentation File 2014.
52. Krause R.M. Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection. Environ. Plan. C: Govern. Policy 2011, 29(1):46-62.
53. Krott M. Öffentliche Verwaltung im Umweltschutz: Ergebnisse einer behördenorientierten Policy-Analyse am Beispiel Waldschutz 1990, vol. 5. W. Braumüller.
54. Krott M. Forest Policy Analysis 2005, Springer, Dordrecht.
55. Krott M., Hasanagas N.D. Measuring bridges between sectors: causative evaluation of cross-sectorality. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8(5):555-563.
56. Krott M., Bader A., Schusser C., Devkota R., Maryudi A., Giessen L., Aurenhammer H. Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 49:34-42.
57. Krott M., Glück P., Whitby M.C., Dawson P.J. Forest land use policy: symbolic versus substantial planning. Land use for agriculture, forestry and rural development. Proceedings of the 20th symposium of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) 1990, 161-168. Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
58. Kumar S., Kant S. Bureaucracy and new management paradigms: modeling foresters' perceptions regarding community-based forest management in India. For. Policy Econ. 2005, 7(4):651-669.
59. Lenzen M., Moran D., Kanemoto K., Foran B., Lobefaro L., Geschke A. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 2012, 486(7401):109-112.
60. Lukes S. Power: A Radical View 2005, Macmillan, London. 2nd ed.
61. Luttrell C., Loft L., Gebara M.F., Kweka D., Brockhaus M., Angelsen A., Sunderlin W.D. Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(4):52. 10.5751/ES-05834-180452.
62. Marks G. An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance. Reg. Fed. Stud. 1996, 6(2):20-38.
63. Maryudi A. The Contesting Aspirations in the Forests: Actors, Interests and Power in Community Forestry in Java, Indonesia 2011, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
64. Maryudi A. Restoring state control over forest resources through administrative procedures: evidence from a community forestry programme in Central Java, Indonesia. ASEAS 2012, 5(2):229-242.
65. Mbatu R.S. Domestic and international forest regime nexus in Cameroon: an assessment of the effectiveness of REDD+ policy design strategy in the context of the climate change regime. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 52:46-56.
66. McCabe A.C. A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Power and Engaged Scholarship 2013, PhD thesis at the Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
67. McDermott C.L. REDDuced: from sustainability to legality to units of carbon - the search for common interests in international forest governance. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 35:12-19.
68. Mercer J. Prospect theory and political science. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2005, 8:1-21.
69. Moeliono M., Gallemore C., Santoso L., Brockhaus M., Di Gregorio M. Information networks and power: confronting the "wicked problem" of REDD+ in Indonesia. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19(2):9. 10.5751/ES-06300-190209.
70. Movuh M.C.Y. The Colonial heritage and post-Colonial influence, entanglements and implications of the concept of community forestry by the example of Cameroon. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 15:70-77.
71. Mwangi E., Wardell A. Multi-level governance of forest resources (editorial to the special feature). Int. J. Commons 2012, 6(2):79-103.
72. Nellemann, C., Interpol Environmental Crime Programme (Eds.), 2012. Green Carbon, Black Trade: Illegal Logging, Tax Fraud and Laundering in the Worlds Tropical Forests. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.
73. Niskanen W.A. Bureaucracy and Representative Government 1974, Transaction Publishers, Chicago.
74. Ngadiono 35 Tahun Pengelolaan Hutan Indonesia 2004, Yayasan Adi Sanggoro, Bogor.
75. Nurrochmat D.R., et al. Contesting national and international forest regimes: case of timber legality certification for community forests in Central Java, Indonesia. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.008.
76. Ojha H.R., Banjade M.R., Sunam R.K., Bhattarai B., Jana S., Goutam K.R., Dhungana S. Can authority change through deliberative politics?: lessons from the four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 46:1-9.
77. Ojha H.R., Cameron J., Kumar C. Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance of community forestry in Nepal. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11(5):365-374.
78. Olsen J.P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2006, 16(1):1-24.
79. Ongolo S. On the banality of forest governance fragmentation: exploring "gecko politics" as a bureaucratic behaviour in limited statehood. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.005.
80. Palmer C. The Extent and Causes of Illegal Logging: An Analysis of a Major Cause of Tropical Deforestation in Indonesia 2001, Available at: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/17588/1/17588.pdf (accessed 27.05.14).
81. Pauker G.J. Toward a New Order in Indonesia 1967, RAND Corporation, California, USA.
82. Pedersen A.B. Why David sometimes defeats Goliath: the power of actors in disprivileged land-use policy networks. Land Use Policy 2010, 27(2):324-331.
83. Peters B.G. Politics of Bureaucracy 2001, Routledge, London.
84. Purnomo A. Menjaga hutan kita: pro-kontra kebijakan moratorium hutan dan gambut 2012, KPG, Jakarta.
85. Rahayu Y. Peran data spasial kehutanan dalam era keterbukaaan dan transparansi informasi publik. Presentation File 2013.
86. Rayner J., Howlett M., Wilson J., Cashore B., Hoberg G. Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making. For. Policy Econ. 2001, 2(3):319-332.
87. REDD-Monitor Interview with Kuntoro Mangkusubroto, head of Indonesia's REDD+ Task Force: "We are starting a new program, a new paradigm, a new concept, a new way of seeing things" 2012, Available at: http://www.redd-monitor.org/2012/09/20/interview-with-kuntoro-mangkusubroto/ (accessed 29.05.14).
88. Resosudarmo B.P., Ardiansyah F., Napitupulu L. The dynamics of climate change governance in Indonesia. Climate Governance in the Developing World 2013, 73-90. Polity, Cambridge. D. Held, C. Roger, E.M. Nag (Eds.).
89. Rock M.T. The Politics of Development Policy and Development Policy Reform in New Order Indonesia. Working Paper Number 632 2003, William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan, USA.
90. Sadath M.N., Krott M. Identifying policy change - analytical program analysis: an example of two decades of forest policy in Bangladesh. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 25:93-99.
91. Sahide M.A.K., Giessen L. The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia - analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy 2015, 43:96-110.
92. Samadhi N. Indonesia One Map: assuring better delivery of national development goals. Presented at the Geospatial World Forum 2013 2013, Available at: http://www.geospatialworldforum.org/2013/presentation/Nirata%20Samdhi.pdf (accessed 30.05.14).
93. Santosa M.A., Khatarina J., Suwana A.S. The progress on governing REDD+ in Indonesia [Special edition]. Int. J. Rural Law Policy 2013, Available at: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ijrlp/article/view/3356 (accessed 3.06.14).
94. Sayer J.A., Collins M. Forest governance in a changing world: reconciling local and global values. Round Table 2012, 101(2):137-146.
95. Schultze U., Avital M. Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inf. Organ. 2011, 21(1):1-16.
96. Schusser C. Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors' power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 36:42-51.
97. Schusser C., Krott M., Logmani J. The applicability of the German community forestry model to developing countries. Forstarchiv 2013, 84:24-29.
98. Simangunsong B.C.H. The Economic Performance of Indonesia's Forest Sector in the Period 1980-2002. Briefing Paper No. 4 2004, Departemen Kehutanan Indonesia.
99. Singer B. Putting the national back into forest-related policies: the international forests regime and national policies in Brazil and Indonesia. Int. For. Rev. 2008, 10(3):523-537.
100. Sloan S. Indonesia's moratorium on new forest licenses: an update. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:37-40.
101. Sulistiawati L.Y. REDD+ Issues Influence in Indonesia's Regulatory Process Case Studies UNREDD Indonesia, REDD Plus Project Indonesia-Norway 2013, Thesis (PhD), University of Washington.
102. Tacconi L., Moore P.F., Kaimowitz D. Fires in tropical forests - what is really the problem? Lessons from Indonesia. Mitig. adapt. Strateg. Global Change 2007, 12(1):55-66.
103. Uhlaner C.J. Relational goods and participation: incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice 1989, 62(3):253-285.
104. Vis B., Van Kersbergen K. Why and how do political actors pursue risky reforms?. J. Theor. Polit. 2007, 19(2):153-172.
105. Wardojo W., Masripatin N. Trends in Indonesian forest policy. Policy Trend Rep. 2002, 77-87.
106. Wibowo A., Giessen L. Actor positions on primary and secondary international forest-related issues relevant in Indonesia. J. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 8(3):10-27.
107. Wicke B., Sikkema R., Dornburg V., Faaij A. Exploring land use changes and the role of palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia. Land Use Policy 2011, 28(1):193-206.
108. Yudhoyono S.B. Intervention by H. E. Dr. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. President of the Republic of Indonesia, on climate change at the G-20 Leaders Summit 25 September 2009, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2009, Available at: http://forestclimatecenter.org/files/2009-09-25%20Intervention%20by%20President%20SBY%20on%20Climate%20Change%20at%20the%20G-20%20Leaders%20Summit.pdf (accessed 29.04.14).
109. Badan Informasi Geospasial [BIG] Dokumen Kesepakatan Rapat Koordinasi Nasional Informasi Geospasial Tahun 2013 2013, Available at: http://www.bakosurtanal.go.id/assets/download/DOKUMEN-KESEPAKATAN-RAPAT-KOORDINASI-NASIONALALL.pdf (accessed 29.04.14).
110. Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim [DNPI], McKinsey Indonesia's Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve: Interim Report 2009, DNPI, Jakarta.
111. Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim [DNPI], McKinsey Indonesia's Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve: Final Report 2010, DNPI, Jakarta.
112. Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim [DNPI] Perubahan Iklim dan tantangan peradaban bangsa: 5 tahun DNPI 2008-2013 2013, DNPI, Jakarta.
113. Government of Indonesia Forest Law 1999.
114. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi or Corruption Eradication Commission [KPK] Nota Kesepakatan Bersama: Percepatan pengukuhan kawasan hutan 2013, Available at: http://acch.kpk.go.id/nota-kesepakatan-bersama-percepatan-pengukuhan-kawasan-hutan (accessed 28.05.14).
115. Ministry of Environment [MoE] Summary for Policy Makers: Indonesia Second National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 2009, Ministry of Environment, Jakarta.
116. Ministry of Environment [MoE] Indonesia Second National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 2010, Ministry of Environment, Jakarta.
117. Ministry of Forestry [MoF] IFCA 2007 Consolidation Report: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Indonesia 2008, FORDA of the Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta.
118. Ministry of Forestry [MoF] Forestry Statistics of Indonesia 2012 2013, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta.
119. Ministry of Forestry [MoF], (n.d.). The system of public input mechanism for revision of the Indicative Map for Postponement of New Permit (PIPIB). Excel file. Jakarta: Ministry of Forestry.
120. President of Indonesia Presidential Decree Number 19 on Task Force on REDD+ Institution Preparation 2010.
121. Mulyani M., Jepson P. REDD+ and forest governance in Indonesia. A multistakeholder study of perceived challenges and opportunities. J. Environ. Dev. 2013, 22(3):261-283.
122. President of Indonesia Presidential Instruction No 11 on the Postponement of Issuance of New Licences and Improving Governance of Primary Natural Forests and Peatland 2011.
123. President of Indonesia Presidential Regulation Number 190 on Presidential Staff Unit 2014.
124. President of Indonesia Presidential Regulation Number 16 on the Ministry of Environment and Forestry 2015.
125. President of Indonesia Presidential Instruction No 8 on the Postponement of Issuance of New Licences and Improving Governance of Primary Natural Forests and Peatland 2015.
126. The Government of the Kingdom of Norway, The Government of the Republic of Indonesia Letter of Intent between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on "Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation" 2010, Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/smk/vedlegg/2010/indonesia_avtale.pdf (accessed 28.06.14).