Governing the design of national REDD +: An analysis of the power of agency

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 49, Issue , 2014, Pages 23-33

  Brockhaus, Maria ^a   Di Gregorio, Monica ^a,b   Mardiah, Sofi ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agency; Discourse coalitions; Environmental governance; Power; REDD+; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AGENCY; DISCOURSE COALITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCES; POWER; REDD;

DESIGN;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; POWER;

EID: 84918800983     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Acharya K.P. Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal. International Forestry Review 2002, 4:149-156.
2. Angelsen A., McNeill D. The evolution of REDD+. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 31-48. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
3. Angelsen A., Rudel T.K. Designing and implementing effective REDD+ policies: A forest transition approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2013, 7(1):91-113.
4. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W.D. Sunderlin, S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff (Eds.).
5. Angelsen A., Brown S., Loisel C., Peskett L., Streck C., Zarin D. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report 2009, Meridian Institute, Washington, DC.
6. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
7. Arts B. Forests policy analysis and theory use: overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 16:7-13.
8. Babon A., Gowae G.Y. The context of REDD+ in Papua New Guinea: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional Paper 89 2013, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
9. Babon A., McIntyre D., Sofe R. REDD+ Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Papua New Guinea 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
10. Bachrach P., Baratz M. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice 1970, Oxford University Press, London.
11. Bartels W.-L., Schmink M., Amaral Borges E., Pereira Duarte A., Domingos Silva Dos Santos Arcos H. Diversifying livelihood systems, strengthening social networks and rewarding environmental stewardship among small-scale producers in the Brazilian Amazon: lessons from Proambiente. Payments for Environmental Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change 2010, 82-105. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. L. Tacconi, S. Mahanty, H. Suich (Eds.).
12. Bell A. Climate of opinion: public and media discourse on the environment. Discourse and Society 1994, 5:33-64.
13. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 2000, 26:611-639.
14. Biermann F. Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 2:284-288.
15. Biermann F., Pattberg P., van Asselt H., Zelli F. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9(4):14-40.
16. Biermann F., Abbott K., Andresen S., Backstrand K., Bernstein S., Betsill M.M., Bulkeley H., Cashore B., Clapp J., Folke C., Gupta A., Gupta J., Haas P.M., Jordan A., Kanie N., Kluvankova-Oravska T., Lebel L., Liverman D., Meadowcroft J., Mitchell R.B., Newell P., Oberthur S., Olsson L., Pattberg P., Sanchez-Rodriguez R., Schroeder H., Underdal A., Vieira S.C., Vogel C., Young O.R., Brock A., Zondervan R. Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4:51-60.
17. Borner J., Wunder S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Hyman G., Nascimento N. REDD sticks and carrots in the Brazilian Amazon: assessing costs and livelihood implications. CCAFS Working Paper No. 8. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change 2011, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
18. Brandes U., Kenis P., Raab J., Schneider V., Wagner D. Explorations into the visualization of policy networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1999, 11:75-106.
19. Brockhaus M., Angelsen A. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy framework. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 15-30. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
20. Brockhaus M., Di Gregorio M. A Brief Overview: Component 1 on National REDD+Policies and Processes. CIFOR Infobrief 13 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
21. Brockhaus M., Di Gregorio M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. Guide for Country Profiles: Global Comparative Study on REDD (GCS-REDD) Component 1 on National REDD+Policies and Processes 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
22. Brockhaus M., Obidzinski K., Dermawan A., Laumonier Y., Luttrell C. An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 18:30-37.
23. Bulkeley H. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2000, 18:727-748.
24. Bulkeley H., Newell P. Governing Climate Change 2010, Routledge, London.
25. Bushley, B., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Nepal. Unpublished results.
26. Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how nonstate market driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 2002, 15:503-529.
27. Corbera E., Schroeder H. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 12:89-100.
28. Crenson M. The UnPolitics of air pollution 1971, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
29. Cronin T., Santoso L. REDD+Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Indonesia. CIFOR Working Paper No. 49 2010, CIFOR, Bogor.
30. Cronin, T., Santoso, L., Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., 2012. Moving consensus and managing expectations: Media and REDD+ in Indonesia. Unpublished results.
31. Di Gregorio M., Brockhaus M., Cronin T., Muharrom E. Politics and power in national REDD+policy processes. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 69-90. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
32. Di Gregorio M., Price S., Saunders C., Brockhaus M. Code Book for the Analysis of Media Frames in Articles on REDD 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
33. Di Gregorio M., Brockhaus M., Cronin T., Muharrom E., Santoso L., Mardiah S., Büdenbender M. Equity and REDD+ in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses. Ecology and Society 2013, 18(2):39.
34. Dkamela G.P. The Context of REDD+in Cameroon: Drivers, Agents, and Institutions. Occasional Paper 57 2010, CIFOR, Bogor.
35. Dubé Y.C., Schmithusen F. Cross-sectoral Policy Impacts between Forestry and Other Sectors 2003, FAO, Rome.
36. Cross-sectoral policy developments in forestry 2007, FAO and CABI, Rome and Wallingford. Y.C. Dubé, F. Schmithusen (Eds.).
37. Foucault M. Truth and power. Power/Knowledge 1980, 109-133. Harvester, Brighton. C. Gordon (Ed.).
38. Fuller S. From context to context: a social epistemology of the structure-agency craze. What is Social Theory? The Philosophical Debate 1998, 92-117. Blackwell, Oxford. A. Sica (Ed.).
39. Gebara, M.F., Zhang, S., Fatorelli, L., May, P., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Brazil. Unpublished results.
40. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration 1984, Polity Press, Cambridge.
41. Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience 1974, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
42. Hajer M. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning 1993, 43-76. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. F. Fischer, J. Forester (Eds.).
43. Hajer M. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
44. Hajer M., Versteeg W. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2005, 7:175-184.
45. Hay C., Wincott D. Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies 1998, 46:951-957.
46. Hosonuma N., Herold M., De Sy V., De Fries R.S., Brockhaus M., Verchot L., Angelsen A., Romjin E. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters 2012, 7:1-12.
47. Indrarto G.B., Murharjanti P., Khatarina J., Pulungan I., Ivalerina F., Rahman J., Prana M.N., Resosudarmo I.A.P., Muharrom E. The Context of REDD+in Indonesia: Drivers, Agents and Institutions. Working Paper 92 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
48. Jasanoff S. Governing innovation. Paper presented at Knowledge in Question - A symposium on interrogating knowledge and questioning science #597, May 2009 2009, (Available at http://www.india-seminar.com/2009/597/597_sheila_jasanoff.htm, accessed 16 April 2012).
49. Jessop B. Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A 2001, 33:1213-1235.
50. Kaimowitz D., Angelsen A. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review 1998, CIFOR, Bogor.
51. Kanninen M., Murdiyarso D., Seymour F., Angelsen A., Wunder S., German L. Do Trees Grow on Money? The Implications of Deforestation Research for Policies to Promote REDD 2008, CIFOR, Bogor.
52. Kanowski P.J., McDermott C.L., Cashore B.W. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:111-117.
53. Karsenty A. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: facing critical choices. International Forestry Review 2008, 10:443-457.
54. Karsenty A., Ongolo S. Can 'fragile states' decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 18:38-45.
55. Kengoum D.F. REDD+Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Cameroon. Working Paper 51 2011, CIFOR, Bogor.
56. Kengoum, D.F., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Cameroon. Unpublished results.
57. Khatri D.B., Bhushal R.P., Paudel N.S., Gurung N. REDD+Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Nepal. Working Paper 96 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
58. Knoke D. Who steals my purse steals trash: the structure of organizational influence reputation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1998, 10:507-530.
59. Kriesi H., Adam S., Jochum M. Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 2006, 13:341-361.
60. Krott M., Bader A., Schusser C., Devkota R.R., Maryudi A., Giessen L., Aurenhammer H. Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 2013, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012.
61. Laumann E.O., Knoke D. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains 1987, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
62. Lemos M.C., Agrawal A. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006, 31:297-325.
63. Luttrell C., Obidzinski K., Brockhaus M., Muharrom E., Petkova E., Wardell A., Halperin J. Lessons for REDD+from Measures to Control Illegal Logging in Indonesia 2011, CIFOR, Bogor.
64. Luttrell C., Resosudarmo I.A.P., Muharrom E., Brockhaus M., Seymour F. The political context of REDD+in Indonesia: constituencies for change. Environmental Science and Policy 2012, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.001.
65. Luttrell C., Loft L., Gebara F.M., Kweka D., Brockhaus M., Angelsen A., Sunderlin W. Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and Realities. Ecology and Society 2013, (in press).
66. May P.H., Calixto B., Gebara M.F. REDD+Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Brazil. Working Paper 55 2011, CIFOR, Bogor.
67. May P.H., Millikan B., Gebara M.F. The Context of REDD+in Brazil: Drivers, Agents, and Institutions 2011, CIFOR, Bogor. second ed.
68. McIntire, D., Babon, A., Gowae, G., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Papua New Guinea. Unpublished results.
69. Mehlum H., Moene K., Torvik R. Institutions and the resource curse. The Economic Journal 2006, 116(508):1-20.
70. Moeliono, M., Santoso, L., Gallemore, C., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Indonesia. Unpublished results.
71. Moeliono M., Santoso L., Gallemore C. REDD+policy networks in Indonesia 2013, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
72. Newell P. Climate for change: Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
73. Ostrom E. Coping with the tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 1999, 2:493-535.
74. Pacheco P., Putzel L., Obidzinski K., Schoneveld G. REDD+and the global economy: competing forces and policy options. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 51-68. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
75. Paudel N.S., Khatri D.B., Khanal D.R., Karki R. The Context of REDD+in Nepal: Drivers, Agents and Institutions. Occasional Paper 81 2013, CIFOR, Bogor.
76. Pham T.T. REDD+Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Vietnam. Working Paper 53 2011, CIFOR, Bogor.
77. Pham, T.T., 2012. Report on REDD+ policy networks in Vietnam. Unpublished results.
78. Pham T.T., Moeliono M., Nguyen T.H., Nguyen H.T., Vu T.H. The Context of REDD+in Vietnam: Drivers, Agents and Institutions. Occasional Paper 75 2012, CIFOR, Bogor.
79. Pham T.T., Di Gregorio M., Brockhaus M. REDD+ policy debates in public discourses: a media-based case study from Vietnam 2012, Unpublished results.
80. Rethemeyer R.K. Policymaking in the age of internet: Is the internet tending to make policy networks more or less inclusive?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2007, 17:259-284.
81. Ross M.L. Timber Booms and Institutional Breakdown in Southeast Asia 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
82. Ross M.L. The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics 1999, 51:297-322.
83. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach 1993, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. P.A. Sabatier, H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.).
84. Schroeder H. Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10:317-332.
85. Shannon M.A. Mechanisms for coordination. Cross-Sectoral Policy Impacts Between Forestry and other Sectors, FAO Forestry Paper 2003, vol. 142. (FAO, Rome). Y.C. Dubé, F. Schmithüsen (Eds.).
86. Stocks A. Too much for too few: problems of indigenous land rights in Latin America. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005, 34:85-104.
87. Vatn A., Vedeld P.O. National governance structures for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 2012, 23:422-432.
88. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
89. Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Angelsen A. Global and national REDD+ architecture: Linking institutions and actions. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, 13-24. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W.D. Sunderlin, S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff (Eds.).