REDD+ and Forest Governance in Indonesia: A Multistakeholder Study of Perceived Challenges and Opportunities

Journal of Environment and Development

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 261-283

  Mulyani, Mari ^a   Jepson, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

clientelism; climate change; forest governance; Indonesia; institutions; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)

Indexed keywords

BUREAUCRACY; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER; STRUCTURAL CHANGE;

INDONESIA;

EID: 84881358748     PISSN: 10704965     EISSN: 15525465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1070496513494203     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. Angelsen A.Brockhaus M.Kanninen M.Sills E.Sunderlin W. D.Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., ed. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2009:.
2. Atmadja S.,Wollenberg E.Indonesia. Springate-Baginski O.Wollenberg E., ed. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2010:73-94.
3. Auyero J.From the client's point(s) of view: How poor people perceive and evaluate political clientelism.Theory and Society. 1999;28:297-334.
4. Barr C.,Dermawan A.,Purnomo H.,Komarudin H.Financial governance and Indonesia's reforestation fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989-2009: A political economic analysis of lessons for REDD. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2010:.
5. Barr C.,Resosudarmo I. A. P.,Dermawan A.,McCarthy J.,Moeliono M.,Setiono B.Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia. Implications for forest sustainability, economic development and community livelihoods. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2006:.
6. Barr C.,Wollenberg E.,Limberg G.,Anau N.,Iwan R.,Sudana I. M.,Djogo T.The impacts of decentralization on forests and forest-dependent communities in Kabupaten Malinau, East Kalimantan. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2001:.
7. Barr C. M.Bob Hasan, the rise of Apkindo, and the shifting dynamics of control in Indonesia's timber sector.Indonesia. 1998;65:1-36.
8. Boer R.,Sulistyowati Las, I.,Zed F.,Masripatin N.,Kartakusuma D. A.,Mulyanto H. S.Summary for policy makers: Indonesia second national communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Jakarta, Indonesia: State Minister of the Environment, Government of Indonesia; 2009:.
9. Bozmoski A. S.,Hultman N. E.Participant perceptions of risk and benefit in carbon forestry: Evidence from central Tanzania.Journal of Environment & Development. 2010;19:4-27.
10. Brockhaus M.,Obidzinski K.,Dermawan A.,Laumonier Y.,Luttrell C.An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?.Forest Policy and Economics. 2011;18:30-37.
11. Brown D. W.Addicted to rent: Corporate and spatial distribution of forest resources in Indonesia; Implications for forest sustainability and government policy. Report No. PFM/EC/99/06. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesia-UK Tropical Forest Management Programme (ITFMP); 1999:.
12. Brown H. C. P.,Smit B.,Sonwa D. J.,Somorin O. A.,Nkem J.Institutional perceptions of opportunities and challenges of REDD+ in the Congo Basin.Journal of Environment & Development. 2011;20:381-404.
13. CaravaniA.GrahamK. (2011). Market and non-market costs of REDD+ perceived by local communities: A case study in East Cambodia. REDD-Net. Retrieved from http://redd-net.org/files/case%20study%205%20-%20cambodia%20Alice%20final.pdf.
14. Cattaneo A.,Lubowski R.,Busch J.,Creed A.,Strassburg B.,Boltz F.,Ashton R.On international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation.Environmental Science & Policy. 2010;13:742-753.
15. Clémençon R.The Bali road map: A first step on the difficult journey to a post-Kyoto protocol agreement.Journal of Environment & Development. 2008;17 (1): 70-94.
16. Contreras A. H.,Fay C.Strengthening forest management in Indonesia through land tenure reform: Issues and framework for action. Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Trends, World Agroforestry Centre; 2005:.
17. CotulaL.MayersJ. (2009). Tenure in REDD-Start-point or afterthought? Natural Resource Issues No. 15. International Institute for Environment and Development. London, UK. Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/13554IIED.pdf.
18. Dermawan A.,Petkova E.,Sinaga A.,Muhajir M.,Indriatmoko Y.Preventing the risks of corruption in REDD+ in Indonesia. Summary report. Jakarta, Indonesia: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and Center for International Forestry Research; 2011:.
19. Di Gregorio M.,Brockhaus M.,Cronin T.,Muharrom EAnalysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Angelsen A.Brockhaus M.Sunderlin W. D.Verchot L., ed. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research; 2012:69-90.
20. Edwards D. P.,Koh L. P.,Laurance W. F.Indonesia's REDD+ pact: Saving imperilled forests or business as usual?.Biological Conservation. 2012;151 (1): 41-44.
21. Eisenstadt S. N.,Roniger L.Patrons, clients, and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1984:.
22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (FAO, 2011). The state of forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin and Southeast Asia. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2247e/i2247e00.pdf.
23. Gellert P. K.Rival transnational networks, domestic politics and Indonesian timber.Journal of Contemporary Asia. 2010;40:539-567.
24. Law No. 30/2002 on the establishment of corruption eradication commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi - KPK). Jakarta, Indonesia: Authors; 2002a:.
25. Government regulation: Decision of director general of taxation, No. KEP-173/PJ/2002. Guidelines for salary standards for foreign workers. Jakarta, Indonesia: Authors; 2002b:.
26. Government of Indonesia. (GoI, 2012). National REDD+ Strategy. REDD+ Task Force. Retrieved from www.satgasreddplus.org.
27. Government regulation of civil servant salary: Thirteenth amendment on government regulation No 7/1977. Jakarta, Indonesia: Author; 2011:.
28. Gordon D.,Murray B. C.,Pendleton L.,Victor B.Financing options for blue carbon opportunities and lessons from the REDD+ Experience. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Report. Durham, NC: Nicholas Institute, Duke University; 2011:.
29. Graziano L.A conceptual framework for the study of Clientelistic behavior.European Journal of Political Research. 1976;4:149-174.
30. Hajek F.,Ventresca M. J.,Scriven J.,Castro A.Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru.Environmental Science & Policy. 2011;14:263-282.
31. Indonesia National REDD+ Readiness and activities. Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES); 2012:.
32. AR4 synthesis report, Summary for Policymakers. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
33. Jepson P.,Jarvie J. K.,MacKinnon K.,Monk K. A.The end for Indonesia's lowland forests?.Science. 2001;292 (5518): 859-861.
34. JepsonP. (2001). Biodiversity and protected area policy: Why is it failing in Indonesia? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, UK.
35. Kanninen M.,Brockhaus M.,Murdiyarso D.Forests and society-Responding to global drivers of change. Mery G.Katila P.Galloway G.Alfaro R. I.Kanninen M.Lobovikov M.Varjo J.J, ed. Vienna, Austria: IUFRO; 2010:43-54.
36. Linkie M.,Smith R. J.,Zhu Y.,Martyr D. J.,Suedmeyer B.,Pramono J.,Leader-Williams N.Evaluating biodiversity conservation around a large Sumatran protected area.Conservation Biology. 2008;22:683-690.
37. Letter of Intent. (2010). Letter of intent between the government of the kingdom of Norway and the government of the Republic of Indonesia on "Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation". Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/SMK/Vedlegg/2010/Indonesia_avtale.pdf.
38. Lyster R.REDD, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law.Environmental Science and Policy. 2010;14:118-126.
39. May P. H.,Millikan B.,Gebara M. F.The context of REDD+ in Brazil. Drivers, agents, and institutions. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2011:.
40. McCarthy J. F.The changing regime: Forest property and reformasi in Indonesia.Development and Change. 2000;31 (1): 91.
41. McCarthy J. F.Power and interest on Sumatra's rainforest frontier: Clientelist coalitions, illegal logging and conservation in the Alas Valley.Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 2002;33 (1): 77-106.
42. McCarthy J. F.Between Adat and state: Institutional arrangements on Sumatra's forest frontier.Human Ecology. 2005;33 (1): 57-82.
43. McCarthy J. F.The fourth circle: A political ecology of Sumatra's rainforest frontier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2006:.
44. McDermott C.,Coad L.,Helfgott A.,Schroeder H.Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: actors, interests and ideas.Environmental Science and Policy. 2012;21:63-72.
45. McDermott C. L.,Cashore B. W.,Kanowski P.Global environmental forestry policies: An international comparison. London, UK: Earthscan; 2010:.
46. Merriam S.Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1998:.
47. Murdiyarso D.,Dewi S.,Lawrence D.,Seymour F.Indonesia's forest moratorium. A stepping stone to better forest governance?. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2011:.
48. Neher C.D.The transition to democracy in Thailand.Asian Perspective. 1996;20:301-321.
49. Newell P.Varieties of CDM governance: Some reflections.Journal of Environment & Development. 2009;18:425.
50. Nussbaum R.,Hoare A.,McDermott C.,Saunders J.,Costa P.M.Accelerating transfers of interim finance for REDD+: Building absorptive capacity. Oxford, UK:; 2009:.
51. Okereke C.,Dooley K.Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: Towards a post-climate agreement.Global Environmental Change. 2010;20:82-95.
52. Patton M. Q.Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
53. Pereira S. N. C.Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: How can conservation and development be reconciled?.Journal of Environment & Development. 2010;19:171.
54. Phelps J.,Guerrero M. C.,Dalabajan D. A.,Young B.,Webb E. L.What makes a "REDD" country?.Global Environmental Change. 2010;20:322-332.
55. Phongpaichit P.,Piriyarangsan S.Corruption and democracy in Thailand. Bangkok,Thailand: Political Economy Centre, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University; 1994:.
56. Purnomo H.,Suyamto D.,Abdullah L.,Irawati R. H.REDD+ Actor analysis and political mapping: An Indonesian case study.International Forestry Review. 2012;14 (1): 74-89.
57. NVivo 10 research software for analysis and insight. Doncaster, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2012:.
58. REDD in Indonesia. (REDD-I, 2009). Intervention by H.E. Dr. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, President of the Republic of Indonesia on climate change at the G-20 Leaders Summit, 25September2009, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from .
59. Restuti D.,Michaelowa A.The economic potential of biogases cogeneration as CDM projects in Indonesia.Energy Policy. 2007;35:3952-3966.
60. Rosenbarger A.Community-based forestry in Kalimantan: An assessment of authority, policy, and capacity. Durham, NC: Ecosystem Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University; 2009:.
61. SaatchiS. S.HarrisN. L.BrownS.LefskyM.MitchardE. T. A.Salas W. MorelA. (2011). Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(24), 1-6. doi:www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1019576108.
62. Strassburg B.,Turner K.,Fisher B.,Schaeffer R.,Love A.An empirically-derived mechanism of combined incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment; 2008:.
63. Sunderlin W. D.,Hatcher J.,Liddle M.From exclusion to ownership? challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform. Washington, DC: Rights and Resources Initiative; 2008:.
64. Suyanto M. E.,Noordwijk V. M.Fair and efficient? How stakeholders view investments to avoid deforestation in Indonesia. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre; 2009:.
65. Szabo M.Drax CO2 permit demand falls after firing biomass unit.Carbon Market Daily. A Point Carbon News publication. 2013;10 (87): 1-5.
66. Tewari R.NAMAs, International support, and appropriateness: Reflections from COP 18.The Energy and Resource Institute. 2013;3 (4): 2-8.
67. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (UNFCCC, 2008). Decision 1/CP.13. The Bali action plan: outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc working group on longterm cooperative action under the convention. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2.
68. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (UNFCCC, 2011). Decision 1/CP.16. The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2.
69. Van der Werf G. R.,Morton D. C.,de Fries R. S.,Olivier J. G. J.,Kasibhatla P. S.,Jackson R. B.,Randerson J. T.CO2 emissions from forest loss.Nature Geoscience. 2009;2:737-738.
70. Wells M.,Guggenheim S.,Khan A.,Wardojo W.,Jepson P.Investing in biodiversity. A review of Indonesia's integrated conservation and development project's. Washington, DC: The World Bank, East Asia Region; 1999:.