The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact LAO learners’ beliefs have on uptake

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 64-82

  Rummel, Stephanie ^a   Bitchener, John ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Error correction; Errors; Written corrective feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938677599     PISSN: 01550640     EISSN: 18337139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/aral.38.1.04rum     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, J. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
3. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-258.
4. Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In A. Barcelos and P. Kalaja (Eds). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp 7-33). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
6. Bitchener, J. (2009a). Measuring the effectiveness of written corrective feedback: A response to “Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Bitchener (2008)”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 276-279.
7. Bitchener, J. (2009b). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322-329.
8. Bitchener, J. (2012). The language learning potential of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-363.
9. Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012).Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
10. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008).The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
11. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193-214.
12. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.
13. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effective of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
14. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
15. DeKeyser, R. (1994). How implicit can adult second language learning be? Consciousness & Second Language Learning: Perspectives on Form-Focused Instruction. AILA Review, 11.
16. DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(03), 379-410.
17. DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
19. Ellis, N. C. (2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and formfocused learning. The handbook of language teaching, 139.
20. Ellis, N.C. (2011). Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & R. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp.35-47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University press.
21. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
23. Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49-62.
25. Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and longterm effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. J. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
27. Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 329-344.
28. Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied linguistics, 9(2), 198-217.
29. Hatch, E. (1978). Second language acquisition: A book of readings. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
30. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
31. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal,75, 305-313.
32. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman. Lalande II, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
33. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
34. Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Input and acquisition for second-language learners in and out of classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 263-273.
35. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second‐language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259-278.
36. Mahfoodh, O., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14-25.
37. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
38. Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375-389.
39. Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). ‘If only I had more time’: ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68.
40. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
41. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
42. Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
43. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-83.
44. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556-569.
45. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334.
46. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking It through: Two French Immersion Learners' Response to Reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304, p.285-304.
47. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
48. Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting errors for selective error correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27, 93-108.
49. Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
50. Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.
51. Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in Dutch multilingual classrooms. Language Learning, 62, 1-41.
52. Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond the basics. System, 27, 435-441.
53. Yang, N. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.