Perceptual biases in relation to paranormal and conspiracy beliefs

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Van Elk, Michiel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ATTENTION; COGNITIVE BIAS; CONSPIRACY BELIEF; CONSPIRACY BELIEF QUESTIONNAIRE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PARANORMAL BELIEF; PERCEPTUAL DECISION MAKING; RESPONSE TIME; REVISED PARANORMAL BELIEF SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SOCIAL BELIEF; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PERCEPTION;

ADULT; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84938630501     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130422     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Colzato LS, van den Wildenberg WP, Hommel B (2008) Losing the big picture: how religion may control visual attention. PLoS One 3: e3679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003679 PMID: 19002253
2. Masuda T, Nisbett RE (2001) Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol 81: 922-934. PMID: 11708567
3. Masuda T, Nisbett RE (2000) Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Americans and Japanese. Int J Psychol 35: 258-258.
4. Nisbett RE, Miyamoto Y (2005) The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 467-473. PMID: 16129648
5. Colzato LS, van Beest I, van den Wildenberg WP, Scorolli C, Dorchin S, Meiran S et al. (2010) God: Do I have your attention? Cognition 117: 87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.003 PMID: 20674890
6. Blackmore SJ, Moore R (1993) Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. Eur J Parapsychol 10.
7. Fyfe S, Williams C, Mason OJ, Pickup GJ (2008) Apophenia, theory of mind and schizotypy: perceiving meaning and intentionality in randomness. Cortex 44: 1316-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.009 PMID: 18635161
8. Gianotti LR, Mohr C, Pizzagalli D, Lehmann D, Brugger P (2001) Associative processing and paranormal belief. Psychiat Clin Neuros 55: 595-603.
9. Krummenacher P, Mohr C, Haker H, Brugger P (2010) Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 1670-1681. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21313 PMID: 19642883
10. Riekki T, Lindeman M, Aleneff M, Halme A, Nuortimo A (2013) Paranormal and Religious Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non-believers. Appl Cogn Psychol 27: 150-155.
11. van Elk M (2013) Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Conscious Cogn 22: 1041-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.07.004 PMID: 23933505
12. Barrett JL (2000) Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 29-34. PMID: 10637620
13. Guthrie S (1993) Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. van Elk M, Rutjens B, van der Pligt J, van Harreveld F (2014) Supernatural agent priming and agency detection. Religion Brain Behav.
15. Barrett JL, Burdett ER (2011) The cognitive science of religion. Psychologist 24: 252-255.
16. Guthrie S (1980) A cognitive theory of religion. Curr Anthropol 21: 181-120.
17. Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG (2004) A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Nature 431: 859-862. PMID: 15483614
18. Darwin H, Neave N, Holmes J (2011) Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Pers Indiv Dif 50: 1289-1293.
19. Newheiser AK, Farias M, Tausch N (2011) The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Pers Indiv Differ 51: 1007-1011.
20. Van Prooijen JW, Jostmann NB (2013) Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. Eur J Soc Psychol 43: 109-115.
21. Whitson JA, Galinsky AD (2008) Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science 322: 115-117. doi: 10.1126/science.1159845 PMID: 18832647
22. Douglas KM, Sutton RM (2011) Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. Brit J Soc Psychol 50: 544-552.
23. Kramer RM (1998) Paranoid cognition in social systems: thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2: 251-275. PMID: 15647133
24. Newheiser AK, Farias M, Tausch N (2011) The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences 51: 1007-1011.
25. Stieger S, Gumhalter N, Tran US, Voracek M, Swami V (2013) Girl in the cellar: a repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology 4.
26. Imhoff R, Bruder M (2014) Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. European Journal of Personality 28: 25-43.
27. Goertzel T (1994) Belief in conspiracy theories. Polit Psychol 15: 731-742.
28. Wood MJ, Douglas KM, Sutton RM (2012) Dead and Alive Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 3: 767-773.
29. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Seli P, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA (2012) Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 123: 335-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003 PMID: 22481051
30. Swami V, Voracek M, Stieger S, Tran US, Furnham A (2014) Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133: 572-585. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 PMID: 25217762
31. Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive psychology 9: 353-383.
32. Miller J (1981) Global Precedence in Attention and Decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 7: 1161-1174. PMID: 6458645
33. Tobacyk J (2004) A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Int J Transpersonal Studies 23: 94-98.
34. Howell GT, Lacroix GL (2012) Decomposing interactions using GLM in combination with the COMPARE, LMATRIX and MMATRIX subcommands in SPSS. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8: 1-22.
35. Brugger P (2001) From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. In: Houran J, Lange R, editors. Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives. pp. 195-213.
36. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 535-574. PMID: 17600525
37. Rieth CA, Lee K, Lui JG, Tian J, Huber DE (2011) Faces in the mist: illusory face and letter detection. I-Perception 2: 458-476. doi: 10.1068/i0421 PMID: 23145238
38. Gosselin F, Schyns PG (2003) Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychol Sci 14: 505-509. PMID: 12930484
39. Kimchi R (1992) Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychol Bull 112: 24-38. PMID: 1529037
40. Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9: 353-383.
41. Leman PJ, Cinnirella M (2007) A major event has a major cause: evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Soc Psychol Rev 9: 18-28.
42. Leman PJ, Cinnirella M (2013) Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Front Psychol 4: 378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378 PMID: 23818885
43. Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Callan M, Dawtry R, Harvey A (in press) Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Thinking & Reasoning.
44. Lindeman M, Aarnio K (2007) Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality 41: 731-744.
45. Gervais WM, Norenzayan A (2012) Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief. Science 336: 493-496. doi: 10.1126/science.1215647 PMID: 22539725
46. Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ (2013) Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol 9 9: 91-121.
47. Goulding A (2004) Schizotypy models in relation to subjective health and paranormal beliefs and experiences. Pers Individ Dif 37: 157-167.
48. Williams LM, Irwin HJ (1991) A Study of Paranormal Belief, Magical Ideation as an Index of Schizotypy and Cognitive-Style. Pers Indiv Differ 12: 1339-1348.
49. Goulding A (2005) Healthy schizotypy in a population of paranormal believers and experients. Pers Individ Dif 38: 1069-1083.
50. Brugger P, Graves RE (1997) Testing vs. believing hypotheses: Magical ideation in the judgement of contingencies. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2: 251-272. doi: 10.1080/135468097396270 PMID: 25419793
51. Galdos M, Simons C, Fernandez-Rivas A, Wichers M, Peralta C, Lataster T et al. (2011) Affectively salient meaning in random noise: a task sensitive to psychosis liability. Schizophr Bull 37: 1179-1186. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq029 PMID: 20360211
52. Vercammen A, de Haan EH, Aleman A (2008) Hearing a voice in the noise: auditory hallucinations and speech perception. Psychol Med 38: 1177-1184. PMID: 18076771
53. Bedwell JS, Kamath V, Compton MT (2009) The relationship between interview-based schizotypal personality dimension scores and the continuous performance test. Schizophr Res 108: 158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.020 PMID: 19101122
54. Corlett PR, Simons JS, Pigott JS, Gardner JM, Murray GK, Krystal JH et al. (2009) Illusions and delusions: relating experimentally-induced false memories to anomalous experiences and ideas. Front Behav Neurosci 3.
55. Reed P, Wakefield D, Harris J, Parry J, Cella M, Tsakanikos E (2008) Seeing non-existent events: Effects of environmental conditions, schizotypal symptoms, and sub-clinical characteristics. J Behav Ther Exp Psy 39: 276-291.
56. Sugimori E, Asai T, Tanno Y (2011) Sense of agency over thought: External misattribution of thought in a memory task and proneness to auditory hallucination. Conscious Cogn 20: 688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.014 PMID: 21296595
57. Goodarzi MA, Wykes T, Hemsley DR (2000) Cerebral lateralization of global-local processing in people with schizotypy. Schizophr Res 45: 115-121. PMID: 10978879
58. Rawlings D, Claridge G (1984) Schizotypy and Hemisphere Function .3. Performance Asymmetries on Tasks of Letter Recognition and Local-Global Processing. Pers Indiv Differ 5: 657-663.
59. Lindeman M, Svedholm AM, Riekki T, Raij T, Hari R (2012) Is it just a brick wall or a sign from the universe? An fMRI study of supernatural believers and skeptics. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8: 943-949. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss096 PMID: 22956664
60. Hergovich A (2003) Field dependence, suggestibility and belief in paranormal phenomena. Pers Indiv Differ 34: 195-209.