Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1041-1046

  Elk, Michiel van ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agency detection; Biological motion; Illusory pattern perception; Paranormal beliefs; Signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PARANORMAL BELIEF; PERCEPTION; RELIGION; SOCIAL BELIEF; STIMULUS; SUPERSTITION; WITCHCRAFT;

AGENCY DETECTION; BIOLOGICAL MOTION; ILLUSORY PATTERN PERCEPTION; PARANORMAL BELIEFS; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PARAPSYCHOLOGY; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84882564906     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abell F., Happe F., Frith U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development 2000, 15(1):1-16.
2. Barrett J.L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(1):29-34.
3. Barrett J.L., Lanman J.A. The science of religious beliefs. Religion 2008, 38(2):109-124.
4. Blackmore S.J., Moore R. Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. European Journal of Parapsychology 1993, 10(91-103).
5. Blakemore S.J., Sarfati Y., Bazin N., Decety J. The detection of intentional contingencies in simple animations in patients with delusions of persecution. Psychological Medicine 2003, 33(8):1433-1441.
6. Brugger P. From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives 2001, McFarland & Company Inc., North Carolina. J. Houran, R. Lange (Eds.).
7. Brugger P., Graves R.E. Testing vs. believing hypotheses: Magical ideation in the judgement of contingencies. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 1997, 2(4):251-272.
8. Brugger P., Mohr C. The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience. Cortex 2008, 44(10):1291-1298.
9. Brugger P., Regard M., Landis T., Cook N., Krebs D., Niederberger J. 'Meaningful' patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP. Psychopathology 1993, 26(5-6):261-265.
10. Colzato L.S., van Beest I., van den Wildenberg W.P., Scorolli C., Dorchin S., Meiran N., et al. God: Do I have your attention?. Cognition 2010, 117(1):87-94.
11. Colzato L.S., van den Wildenberg W.P., Hommel B. Losing the big picture: How religion may control visual attention. PLoS One 2008, 3(11):e3679.
12. Eckblad M., Chapman L.J. Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1983, 51(2):215-225.
13. Fyfe S., Williams C., Mason O.J., Pickup G.J. Apophenia, theory of mind and schizotypy: Perceiving meaning and intentionality in randomness. Cortex 2008, 44(10):1316-1325.
14. Galdos M., Simons C., Fernandez-Rivas A., Wichers M., Peralta C., Lataster T., et al. Affectively salient meaning in random noise: A task sensitive to psychosis liability. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2011, 37(6):1179-1186.
15. Gianotti L.R., Mohr C., Pizzagalli D., Lehmann D., Brugger P. Associative processing and paranormal belief. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2001, 55(6):595-603.
16. Gosselin F., Schyns P.G. Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychological Science 2003, 14(5):505-509.
17. Green D., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
18. Hergovich A. Field dependence, suggestibility and belief in paranormal phenomena. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 34(2):195-209.
19. Krummenacher P., Mohr C., Haker H., Brugger P. Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(8):1670-1681.
20. Lawrence E., Peters E. Reasoning in believers in the paranormal. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders 2004, 192(11):727-733.
21. Lindeman M., Svedholm A.M. What's in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology 2012, 16(241-255).
22. Lindeman M., Svedholm A.M., Riekki T., Raij T., Hari R. Is it just a brick wall or a sign from the universe? An fMRI study of supernatural believers and skeptics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2012.
23. Macmilan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah New Jersey.
24. Peters E., Joseph S., Day S., Garety P. Measuring delusional ideation: The 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophrenia Bulletin 2004, 30(4):1005-1022.
25. Riekki T., Lindeman M., Aleneff M., Halme A., Nuortimo A. Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 27(2):150-155.
26. Rieth C.A., Lee K., Lui J., Tian J., Huber D.E. Faces in the mist: Illusory face and letter detection. Iperception 2011, 2(5):458-476.
27. Russell T.A., Reynaud E., Herba C., Morris R., Corcoran R. Do you see what I see? Interpretations of intentional movement in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 2006, 81(1):101-111.
28. Tobacyk J. A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2004, 23:94-98.
29. Troje N.F., Westhoff C. The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a "life detector"?. Current Biology 2006, 16(8):821-824.
30. Vercammen A., de Haan E.H., Aleman A. Hearing a voice in the noise: Auditory hallucinations and speech perception. Psychological Medicine 2008, 38(8):1177-1184.
31. Wiseman R., Greening E., Smith M. Belief in the paranormal and suggestion in the seance room. British Journal of Psychology 2003, 94:285-297.