Analysis of phylogenomic datasets reveals conflict, concordance, and gene duplications with examples from animals and plants

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Smith, Stephen A ^a   Moore, Michael J ^b   Brown, Joseph W ^a   Yang, Ya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene duplication; Gene tree conflict; Incomplete lineage sorting; Phylogenomics; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HOMOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; NOISE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALIA; CARYOPHYLLALES; HYMENOPTERA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; WASP;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; SOFTWARE; WASPS;

EID: 84938602888     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0423-0     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, et al.Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008; 452(7188):745-9. doi: 10.1038/nature06614.
2. Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, Citarella MR, Kohn AB, Meyer A, et al. Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature. 2011; 477:452-6. doi: 10.1038/nature10382.
3. Smith SA, Wilson NG, Goetz FE, Feehery C, Andrade SCS, Rouse GW, et al.Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature. 2011; 480:364-7. doi: 10.1038/nature10526.
4. Fong JJ, Brown JM, Fujita MK, Boussau B. A phylogenomic approach to vertebrate phylogeny supports a turtle-archosaur affinity and a possible paraphyletic lissamphibia. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(11):48990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048990.
5. Johnson BR, Borowiec ML, Chiu JC, Lee EK, Atallah J, Ward PS. Phylogenomics resolves evolutionary relationships among ants, bees, and wasps. Curr Biol. 2013; 23:2058-062. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.050.
6. Ryan JF, Pang K, Schnitzler CE, Nguyen AD, Moreland RT, Simmons DK, et al.The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science. 2013; 342:1242592. doi: 10.1126/science.1242592.
7. Teeling EC, Hedges SB. Making the impossible possible: Rooting the tree of placental mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30(9):1999-2000. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst118. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/9/1999.full.pdf+html.
8. Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, et al.Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science. 2014; 346(6215):1320-31. doi: 10.1126/science.1253451. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6215/1320.full.pdf.
9. Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, Nguyen N, Warnow T, Carpenter E, Matasci N, et al.Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014; 111(45):4859-868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323926111. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/45/E4859.full.pdf+html.
10. Xi Z, Liu L, Rest JS, Davis CC. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of amborella as sister to water lilies. Syst Biol. 2014; 63(6):919-32. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu055. http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/content/63/6/919.full.pdf+html.
11. Chaudhary R, Burleigh JG, Fernández-Baca D. Inferring species trees from incongruent multi-copy gene trees using the Robinson-Foulds distance. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2013; 8:28. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-8-28. 1210.2665
12. Sharma PP, Kaluziak ST, Pérez-Porro AR, González VL, Hormiga G, Wheeler WC, et al.Phylogenomic interrogation of arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31(11):2963-984. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu235. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/11/2963.full.pdf+html.
13. Galtier N, Daubin V. Dealing with incongruence in phylogenomic analyses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci. 2008; 363(1512):4023-029. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0144.
14. Ané C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24:412-26. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl170.
15. Knowles LL. Estimating species trees: Methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Syst Biol. 2009; 58(5):463-7.
16. Liu L, Yu L, Kubatko L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009; 53(1):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.033.
17. Knowles LL, Kubatko LS. Estimating species trees: an introduction to concepts and models In: Knowles LL, Kubatko LS, editors. Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell: 2010. p. 1-14.
18. Knowles LL, Lanier HC, Klimov PB, He Q. Full modeling versus summarizing gene-tree uncertainty: Method choice and species-tree accuracy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012; 65(2):501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.004.
19. Mirarab S, Bayzid MS, Boussau B, Warnow T. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree. Science. 2014; 346(6215). doi: 10.1126/science.1250463. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6215/1250463.full.pdf.
20. Baum DA. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon. 2007; 56:417-26.
21. Larget BR, Kotha SK, Dewey CN, Ané C. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:2910-911. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq539.
22. Bayzid MS, Warnow T. Naive binning improves phylogenomic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29:2277-284. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt394.
23. Salichos L, Rokas A. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature. 2013; 497:327-1. doi: 10.1038/nature12130.
24. Boussau B, Szollosi GJ, Duret L, Gouy M, Tannier E, Daubin V. Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees. Genome Res. 2013; 23:323-30. doi: 10.1101/gr.141978.112.
25. Salichos L, Stamatakis A, Rokas A. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31:1261-1271. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu061.
26. Yang Y, Smith SA. Orthology inference in nonmodel organisms using transcriptomes and low-coverage genomes: Improving accuracy and matrix occupancy for phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31:3081-092. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu245.
27. Gorecki P, Burleigh GJ, Eulenstein O. Maximum likelihood models and algorithms for gene tree evolution with duplications and losses. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12(Supp 1):1-15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S1-S15.
28. Rasmussen MD, Kellis M. Unified modeling of gene duplication, loss, and coalescence using a locus tree. Genome Res. 2012; 22(4):755-65. doi: 10.1101/gr.123901.111. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/22/4/755.full.pdf+html.
29. Yang Y, Smith SA. Optimizing de novo assembly of short-read RNA-seq data for phylogenomics. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:328. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-328.
30. Wilson JS, von Dohlen CD, Forister ML, Pitts JP. Family-level divergences in the stinging wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata), with correlations to angiosperm diversification. Evol Biol. 2013; 40:101-7. doi: 10.1007/s11692-012-9189-0.
31. Bremer B, Bremer K, Chase MW, Fay MF, Reveal JL, Bailey LH, et al.An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009; 161:105-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x.
32. Bell CD, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am J Bot. 2010; 97:1296-303. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900346.
33. Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107:4623-628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907801107.
34. Magallón S, Gómez-Acevedo S, Sánchez-Reyes LL, Hernández-Hernóndez T. A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytologist. 2015. doi: 10.1111/nph.13264.
35. Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2002; 89:132-44. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.1.132.
36. Schäferhoff B, Müller KF, Borsch T. Caryophyllales phylogenetics: disentangling Phytolaccaceae and Molluginaceae and description of Microteaceae as a new isolated family. Willdenowia. 2009; 39:209-28. doi: 10.3372/wi.39.39201.
37. Arakaki M, Christin PA, Nyffeler R, Lendel A, Eggli U, Ogburn RM, et al.Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world's major succulent plant lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:8379-384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100628108.
38. Brockington SF, Alexandre R, Ramdial J, Moore MJ, Crawley S, Dhingra A, et al.Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales Sensu Lato: Revisiting Hypotheses on Pollination Biology and Perianth Differentiation in the Core Caryophyllales. Int J Plant Sci. 2009; 170:627-43. doi: 10.1086/597785.
39. Brockington SF, Walker RH, Glover BJ, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Complex pigment evolution in the Caryophyllales. New Phytologist. 2011; 190:854-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03687.x.
40. Soltis DE, Smith SA, Cellinese N, Wurdack KJ, Tank DC, Brockington SF, et al.Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am J Bot. 2011; 98:704-30. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000404.
41. Crawley SS, Hilu KW. Impact of missing data, gene choice, and taxon sampling on phylogenetic reconstruction: The Caryophyllales (angiosperms). Plant Syst Evol. 2012; 298:297-312. doi: 10.1007/s00606-011-0544-x.
42. Yang Y, Moore MJ, Brockington SF, Soltis DE, Wong GK-S, Carpenter EJ, et al.Dissecting molecular evolution in the highly diverse plant clade caryophyllales using transcriptome sequencing. Mol Biol Evol. 2015. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv081. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/04/22/molbev.msv081.full.pdf+html.
43. Weinstock GM, Robinson GE, Gibbs RA, Worley KC, Evans JD, Maleszka R, et al.Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature. 2006; 443:931-49. doi: 10.1038/nature05260.
44. Bonasio R, Zhang G, Ye C, Mutti NS, Fang X, Qin N, et al.Genomic comparison of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Science. 2010; 329:1068-71. doi: 10.1126/science.1192428.
45. Werren JH, Richards S, Desjardins CA, Niehuis O, Gadau J, Colbourne JK. The Nasonia Genome Working Group: Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. Science. 2010; 327:343-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1178028.
46. Smith CR, Smith CD, Robertson HM, Helmkampf M, Zimin A, Yandell M, et al.Draft genome of the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:5667-672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007901108.
47. Smith CD, Zimin A, Holt C, Abouheif E, Benton R, Cash E, et al.Draft genome of the globally widespread and invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:5673-678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008617108.
48. Kocher SD, Li C, Yang W, Tan H, Yi SV, Yang X, et al.The draft genome of a socially polymorphic halictid bee, Lasioglossum albipes. Genome Biol. 2013; 14:142. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r142.
49. van Dongen S. Graph clustering: PhD thesis, University of Utrecht; 2000.
50. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30:772-80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010.
51. Liu K, Warnow TJ, Holder MT, Nelesen SM, Yu J, Stamatakis AP, et al.SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol. 2012; 61:90-106. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr095.
52. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:1312-1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 bioinformatics/btu033
53. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24:332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.009.
54. Degnan JH, Salter LA. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution. 2005; 59(1):24-37. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00891.x.
55. Smith SA, O'Meara BC. treepl: divergence time estimation using penalized likelihood for large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(20):2689-690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts492. http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/20/2689.full.pdf+html.
56. Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser L, Huala E, Garcia-Hernandez M, Zhang P, et al.Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol. 2004; 135:745-55. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040071.
57. St Pierre SE, Ponting L, Stefancsik R, McQuilton P. FlyBase 102-advanced approaches to interrogating FlyBase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:780-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1092.
58. Than C, Ruths D, Nakhleh L. Phylonet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9(1):322. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-322.
59. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 2009; 58(5):468-77. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp031. http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/5/468.full.pdf+html.
60. Fontaine MC, Pease JB, Steele A, Waterhouse RM, Neafsey DE, Sharakhov IV, et al.Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science. 6217; 347. doi: 10.1126/science.1258524. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/347/6217/1258524.full.pdf.
61. Zwickl DJ, Stein JC, Wing RA, Ware D, Sanderson MJ. Disentangling methodological and biological sources of gene tree discordance on Oryza (Poaceae) chromosome 3. Syst Biol. 2014; 63:645-59. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu027.