On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Hawelka, Stefan ^a   Schuster, Sarah ^a   Gagl, Benjamin ^a,b   Hutzler, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EYE MOVEMENT; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; VELOCITY; ADULT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938586173     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep08432     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Pellegrino, F., Coupé, C. & Marisco, E. A cross-language perspective on speech information rate. Language 87, 539-558 (2011).
2. Forster, K. I. [Basic issues in lexical processing] Lexical representation and process [Marsen-Wilson, W. D. (Ed.)] [75-107] (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1989).
3. Smith, F. Understanding reading (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971).
4. Norris, D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52, 189-234 (1994).
5. Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L. On the consequences of meaning selection. [67-86] (Psychological Association, Washington; 2001).
6. Perfetti, C. A. Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Sci Stud Read. 11, 357-383 (2007).
7. Perfetti, C. A. Reading acquisition [145-174] (Erlbaum, Hillsdale; 1992).
8. Perfetti, C. A. Reading ability (Oxford University Press, New York; 1985).
9. Hersch, J. & Andrews, S. Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and topdown contributions to sentence processing. Sci Stud Read. 16, 240-262 (2012).
10. Rao, R. P. & Ballard, D. H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive field effects. Nat Neurosci 2, 79-87 (1998).
11. Friston, K. J. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 11, 127-138 (2010).
12. Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J. & Kiebel, S. J. Reinforcement learning or active inference? PLoS ONE 4, e6421 (2009).
13. Vossel, S. et al. Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed. Cereb Cortex. 24, 1436-1450 (2014).
14. Bar, M. et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103, 449-454 (2006).
15. Federmeier, K. D. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology. 44, 491-505 (2007).
16. DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P. &Kutas, M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nat Neurosci. 8, 1117-1121 (2005).
17. Altmann, G. T. M. & Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition. 71, 247-264 (1999).
18. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M. & Haywood, S. L. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. J Mem Lang. 49, 33-156 (2003).
19. Murray, J. D.&Burke, K. A. Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill. Discourse processes. 35, 81-102 (2003).
20. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J. & Seely, M. R. Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 20, 1456-1470 (1994).
21. Kintsch, W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
22. Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R. & Jacobs, A. M. Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE 4, e5047 (2009).
23. Hofmann, M. J. et al. Occipital and orbitofrontal hemodynamics during naturally paced reading: an fNIRS study. Neuroimage 94, 193-202 (2014).
24. Raij, T. et al. Onset timing of cross-sensory activations and multisensory interactions in auditory and visual sensory cortices. Eur J Neurosci. 31, 1772-1782 (2010).
25. Fitzsimmons, G. & Drieghe, D. How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 39, 1054-1063 (2013).
26. Rayner, K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 62, 1457-1506 (2009).
27. Gordon, P. C., Plummer, P. & Choi, W. See before you jump: Full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 39, 633-641 (2013).
28. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. & Engbert, R. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. J Exp Psychol Gen. 135, 12-35 (2006).
29. Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M. & Engbert, R. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 16, 262-284 (2004).
30. Ashby, J., Rayner, K. & Clifton, C. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Q J Exp Psychol A. 58, 1065-1086 (2005).
31. Hawelka, S., Gagl, B. & Wimmer, H. A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers. Cognition 115, 367-379 (2010).
32. Landerl, K. & Wimmer, H. Development of word reading fluency and orthographic spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. J Educ Psychol. 100, 150-161 (2008).
33. Wimmer, H. & Schurz, M. Dyslexia in regular orthographies: manifestation and causation. Dyslexia 16, 283-299 (2010).
34. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). (Washington DC: Author, 2013).
35. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H. The CELEX lexical database [CDROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium (1993).
36. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 59, 390-412 (2008).
37. Inhoff, A. W. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 23, 612-624 (1984).
38. Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G.& Sheridan, H. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cogn Psychol. 65, 177-206 (2010).
39. Staub, A. The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations. Psychon Bull Rev. 18, 371-376 (2011).
40. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M. & Kliegl, R. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol Rev. 112, 777-813 (2005).
41. Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. &Hogaboam, T. Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Mem Cognit. 7, 273-282 (1979).
42. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D. & Seidenberg, M. S. How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychol Sci. 2, 31-74 (2001).
43. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cogn Psychol. 17, 364-390 (1985).
44. Eskenazi, M. A. & Folk, J. R. Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading. Psychon Bull Rev. Epub ahead of print (2014).
45. Sparrow, L. & Miellet, S. Activation of phonological codes during reading: evidence from errors detection and eye movements. Brain Lang. 81, 509-516 (2002).
46. Boets, B. et al. Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science 342, 1251-1254 (2013).
47. Henderson, J. M. & Ferreira, F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 16, 417-429 (1990).
48. Risse, S., Hohenstein, S., Kliegl, R. & Engbert, R. A theoretical analysis of the perceptual span based on SWIFT simulations of the n 1 2 boundary paradigm. Vis Cogn. 22, 283-308 (2014).
49. McConkie, G. W. & Rayner, K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 17, 578-586 (1975).
50. Bar, M. & Aminoff, E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38, 347-358 (2003).
51. Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J. & Niemi, P. Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. J Exp Child Psychol. 102, 167-181 (2009).
52. Rayner, K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. J Exp Child Psychol. 41, 211-236 (1986).
53. Yan, M., Pan, J., Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R. & Shu, H. Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: A comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. J Exp Child Psychol. 115, 579-589 (2013).
54. Wang, A., Zhou, W., Shu, H. & Yan, M. Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: Evidence from reading Chinese as a second language. Acta Psychol. 152, 29-33 (2014).
55. Stein, J. & Walsh, V. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends Neurosci. 20, 147-52 (1997).
56. Zhao, J., Qian, Y., Bi, H.-Y. & Coltheart, M. The visual magnocellular-dorsal dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia impedes Chinese character recognition. Sci. Rep. 4, 7068; DOI:10.1038/srep07068 (2014).
57. Hutzler, F., Kronbichler, M., Jacobs, A. M. & Wimmer, H. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading. Neuropsychologia 44, 637-648 (2006).
58. Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., Defau, S. & Grainger, J. Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Dev Sci. 13, F8-F14 (2010).
59. Hilte, M.&Reitsma, P. Activating the meaning of a word facilitates the integration of orthography: evidence from spelling exercises in beginning spellers. J Res Read. 34, 333-345 (2011).