Across-language perspective on speech information rate

Language

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 539-558

  Pellegrino, François ^a   Coupé, Christophe ^a   Marsico, Egidio ^a  

^a Institut des Sciences de l'Homme   (France)

Author keywords

Cross language study; Information theory; Speech communication; Speech rate; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052867920     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: 15350665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2011.0057     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Ahissar, Ehud; Srikantan Nagarajan; Merav Ahissar; Athanassios Protopapas; Henry Mahncke; AND Michael M. Merzenich. 2001. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96.23.13367-72.
2. Aylett, Matthew P., and Alice Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47.1.31-56.
3. Aylett, Matthew P., and Alice Turk. 2006. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119.3048-58.
4. Baayen, R. Harald; Douglas J. Davidson; and D. M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59.390-412.
5. Baayen, R. Harald; Richard Piepenbrock; and H. Van Rijn. 1993. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Baddeley, Alan D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science 4.417-23.
7. Baddeley, Alan D. 2003. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 4.829-39.
8. Baddeley, Alan D., and Graham J. Hitch. 1974. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 8, ed. by Gordon H. Bower, 47-89. New York: Academic Press.
9. Bavelier, Daphne; Elissa L. Newport; Matthew L. Hall; Ted Supalla; and Mrim Boutla. 2006. Persistent difference in short-term memory span between sign and speech. Psychological Science 17.12.1090-92.
10. Bell, Alan; Jason M. Brenier; Michelle Gregory; Cynthia Girand; and Dan Jurafsky. 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60.1.92-111.
11. Boutla, Mrim; Ted Supalla; Elissa L. Newport; and Daphne Bavelier. 2004. Short-term memory span: Insights from sign language. Nature Neuroscience 7.9.997-1002.
12. Brown, Bruce L.; H. Giles; and J. N. Thakerar. 1985. Speaker evaluation as a function of speech rate, accent and context. Language and Communication 5.3.207-20.
13. Bybee, Joan L. 2006. Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Campione, Estelle, and Jean Véronis. 1998. A multilingual prosodic database. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia.
15. Cherry, E. Colin; Morris Halle; And Roman Jakobson. 1953. Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language 29.1.34-46.
16. Cholin, Joana; Willem J. M. Levelt; and Niels O. Schiller. 2006. Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition 99.205-35.
17. Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Quantitative method in typology. Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook, ed. by Gabriel Altmann, Reinhard Köhler, and Rajmund G. Piotrowski, 554-78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. DAHL, ÖSTEN. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.429-48.
21. Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud, and August Fenk. 1999. Cognition, quantitative linguistics, and systemic typology. Linguistic Typology 3.2.151-77.
22. Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud, and August Fenk. 2005. Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, ed. by Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon and Christian Winkler, 75-86. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.
23. Ferguson, Charles A. 1978. Historical backgrounds of universals research. Universals of human language, vol. 1: Method and theory, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 7-33. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Ferrer I Cancho, Ramon. 2005. Decoding least effort and scaling in signal frequency distributions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 345.275-84.
25. Ferrer I Cancho, Ramon, and Richard V. Solé. 2003. Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100.3.788-91.
26. Frank, Austin F., and T. Florian Jaeger. 2008. Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci08), 939-44. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
27. Genzel, Dmitriy, and Eugene Charniak. 2003. Variation of entropy and parse trees of sentences as a function of the sentence number. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ed. by Michael Collins and Mark Steedman, 65-72. East Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Online: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/acl2003/emnlp/index.htm.
28. Goldsmith, John A. 2000. On information theory, entropy, and phonology in the 20th century. Folia Linguistica 34.1-2.85-100.
29. Goldsmith, John A. 2002. Probabilistic models of grammar: Phonology as information minimization. Phonological Studies 5.21-46.
30. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1969. Language universals: A research frontier. Science 166.473-78.
31. Greenberg, Steven. 1999. Speaking in a shorthand-A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication 29.159-76.
32. Greenberg, Steven, and Eric Fosler-Lussier. 2000. The uninvited guest: Information's role in guiding the production of spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the CREST Workshop on Models of Speech Production: Motor Planning and Articulatory Modeling, Kloster Seeon, Germany.
33. HARRIS, JOHN. 2005. Vowel reduction as information loss. Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity, ed. by Philip Carr, Jacques Durand, and Colin J. Ewen, 119-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Hawkins, John A. 2009. An efficiency theory of complexity and related phenomena. In Sampson et al., 252-68.
36. Hay, Jennifer; Janet Pierrehumbert; and Mary E. Beckman. 2001. Speech perception, well-formedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology 6, ed. by John Local, Richard Ogden, and Rosalind Temple, 58-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hockett, Charles F. 1953. Review of Shannon &Weaver 1949. Language 29.1.69-93.
38. Hockett, Charles F. 1966. The problem of universals in language. Universals of language, 2nd edn., ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 1-29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Hume, Elizabeth. 2006. Language specific and universal markedness: An information theoretic approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Colloquium on Information Theory and Phonology, Albuquerque, NM.
40. Jacewicz, Ewa; Robert A. Fox; Caitlin O'Neill; and Joseph Salmons. 2009. Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change 21.2.233-56.
41. Jakobson, Roman, and Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.
42. Johns-Lewis, Catherine. 1986. Prosodic differentiation of discourse modes. Intonation in discourse, ed. by Catherine Johns-Lewis, 199-220. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
43. Johnson, Keith. 2004. Massive reduction in conversational American English. Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis (Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium), ed. by Kiyoko Yoneyama and K. Maekawa, 29-54. Tokyo: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
44. Joos, Martin. 1936. Review of Zipf 1935. Language 12.3.196-210.
45. Juola, Patrick. 1998. Measuring linguistic complexity: The morphological tier. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 5.3.206-13.
46. Juola, Patrick. 2008. Assessing linguistic complexity. Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, ed. by Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, and Fred Karlsson, 89-108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Karlgren, Hans. 1961. Speech rate and information theory. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Helsinki, 671-77.
48. Keller, Franck. 2004. The entropy rate principle as a predictor of processing effort: An evaluation against eye-tracking data. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcelona, 317-24.
49. King, Robert D. 1967. Functional load and sound change. Language 43.4.831-52.
50. Komatsu, Masahiko; Takayuki Arai; And Tsutomu Sugarawa. 2004. Perceptual discrimination of prosodic types. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan.
51. Kowal, Sabine; Richard Wiese; and Daniel C. O'Connell. 1983. The use of time in storytelling. Language and Speech 26.4.377-92.
52. Kuperman, Victor; Mirjam Ernestus; and R. Harald Baayen. 2008. Frequency distributions of uniphones, diphones, and triphones in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124.6.3897-908.
53. Kuperman, Victor; Mark Pluymaekers; Mirjam Ernestus; and R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121.4.2261-71.
54. Ladefoged, Peter. 1975. A course in phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Ladefoged, Peter. 2007. Articulatory features for describing lexical distinctions. Language 83.1.161-80.
56. Levelt, Willem J. M. 2001. Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98.23.13464-71.
57. Levy, Roger, and T. Florian Jaeger. 2007. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. Advances in neural information processing systems 19, ed. By Bernhard Schölkopf, John Platt, and Thomas Hofmann, 849-56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation:Asketch of the H&H theory. Speech production and speech modelling, ed. by William J. Hardcastle and Alain Marchal, 403-39. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59. Locke, John L. 2008. Cost and complexity: Selection for speech and language. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251.4.640-52.
60. Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Maddieson, Ian. 2006. Correlating phonological complexity: Data and validation. Linguistic Typology 10.1.106-23.
62. Maddieson, Ian. 2009. Calculating phonological complexity. Approaches to phonological complexity, ed. by François Pellegrino, Egidio Marsico, Ioana Chitoran, and Christophe Coupé, 85-110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Marsico, Egidio; Ian Maddieson; Christophe Coupé; and François Pellegrino. 2004. Investigating the 'hidden' structure of phonological systems. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30.256-67.
64. Martinet, André. 1933. Remarques sur le système phonologique du français. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 33.191-202.
65. Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.
66. Martinet, André. 1962. A functional view of language. Oxford: Clarendon.
67. Mueller, Shane T.; Travis L. Seymour; David E. Kieras; and David E. Meyer. 2003. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29.6.1353-80.
68. Nettle, Daniel. 1995. Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency. Linguistics 33.359-67.
69. New, Boris; Christophe Pallier; Marc Brysbaert; and Ludovic Ferrand. 2004. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36.3.516-24.
70. Ohala, John J. 2008. The emergent syllable. The syllable in speech production, ed. by Barbara L. Davis and Krisztina Zadjó, 179-86. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves. 2006. Self-organization in the evolution of speech, trans. by James R. Hurford. (Studies in the evolution of language.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Pellegrino, François; Christophe Coupé; and Egidio Marsico. 2007. An information theory-based approach to the balance of complexity between phonetics, phonology and morphosyntax. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Anaheim, CA.
73. Peng, Gang. 2005. Temporal and tonal aspects of Chinese syllables: A corpus-based comparative study of Mandarin and Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 34.1.134-54.
74. Pennebaker, Jamesw.; Matthias R. Mehl; and Kate G. Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54.547-77.
75. Piantadosi, Steven T.; Harry J. Tily; and Edward Gibson. 2009. The communicative lexicon hypothesis. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci09), 2582-87. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
76. Pitt, Mark A.; Keith Johnson; Elizabeth Hume; Scott Kiesling; and William Raymond. 2005. The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: Labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability. Speech Communication 45.90-95.
77. Plank, Franz. 1998. The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2.2.195-230.
78. Plotkin, Joshua B., and Martin A. Nowak. 2000. Language evolution and information theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205.1.147-60.
79. Pone, Massimiliano. 2005. Studio e realizzazione di una tastiera software pseudo-sillabica per utenti disabili. Genova: Università degli Studi di Genova thesis.
80. Port, Robert F., and Adam P. Leary. 2005. Against formal phonology. Language 81.4.927-64.
81. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: http://www.R-project.org.
82. Roach, Peter. 1998. Some languages are spoken more quickly than others. Language myths, ed. by Laurie Bauer and Peter Trudgill, 150-58. London: Penguin.
83. Sampson, Geoffrey; David Gil; And Peter Trudgill (eds.) 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. (Studies in the evolution of language 13.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. Schiller, Niels O. 2008. Syllables in psycholinguistic theory: Now you see them, now you don't. The syllable in speech production, ed. by Barbara L. Davis and Krisztina Zadjó, 155-76. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Schweickert, Richard, And Brian Boruff. 1986. Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12.419-25.
86. Segui, Juan, And Ludovic Ferrand. 2002. The role of the syllable in speech perception and production. Phonetics, phonology and cognition, ed. by Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks, 151-67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Service, Elisabet. 1998. The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 51A.283-304.
88. Shannon, Claude E., And Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
89. Shosted, Ryan K. 2006. Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology 10.1.1-40.
90. Surendran, Dinoj, And Gina-Anne Levow. 2004. The functional load of tone in Mandarin is as high as that of vowels. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 99-102.
91. Tamaoka, Katsuo, and Shogo Makioka. 2004. Frequency of occurrence for units of phonemes, morae, and syllables appearing in a lexical corpus of a Japanese newspaper. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36.3.531-47.
92. Trubetzkoy, Nicholai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7. [Translated into French as Principes de phonologie, by J. Cantineau. Paris: Klincksieck, 1949.]
93. Trudgill, Peter. 2004. Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology 8.3.305-20.
94. Twaddell, W. Freeman. 1935. On defining the phoneme. Language 11.1.5-62.
95. Van Son, Rob J. J. H., and Louis C. W. Pols. 2003. Information structure and efficiency in speech production. Proceedings of Eurospeech 2003, Geneva, Switzerland, 769-72.
96. Verhoeven, JO; Guy De Pauw; and Hanne Kloots. 2004. Speech rate in a pluricentric language: A comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech 47.3.297-308.
97. Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Zipf, George K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Zipf, George K. 1937. Statistical methods and dynamic philology. Language 13.1.60-70.