Orthology prediction methods: A quality assessment using curated protein families

BioEssays

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 769-780

  Trachana, Kalliopi ^a   Larsson, Tomas A ^a   Powell, Sean ^a   Chen, Wei Hua ^a   Doerks, Tobias ^a   Muller, Jean ^b,c   Bork, Peer ^a,d  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

^d MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Metazoan; Orthology; Quality assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FLY; GENE; GENOME; HUMAN; METAZOON; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPECIES COMPARISON; ZEBRA FISH;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENES; INTERNET; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MUCINS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

METAZOA;

EID: 80052823795     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100062     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Koonin EV, Galperin MY. 2003. Sequence - Evolution - Function. Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics. Kluwer Academic: Boston.
2. Fitch WM. 1970. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool 19: 99-113.
3. Sonnhammer EL, Koonin EV. 2002. Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet 18: 619-20.
4. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278: 631-7.
5. Ruan J, Li H, Chen Z, Coghlan A, et al. 2008. TreeFam. 2008. Update. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D735-40.
6. Muller J, Szklarczyk D, Julien P, Letunic I, et al. 2010. eggNOG v2.0. extending the evolutionary genealogy of genes with enhanced non-supervised orthologous groups, species and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D190-195.
7. Waterhouse RM, Zdobnov EM, Tegenfeldt F, Li J, et al. 2011. OrthoDB, the hierarchical catalog of eukaryotic orthologs in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D283-288.
8. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert, CJ Jr., Roos DS. 2006. OrthoMCL-DB. Querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D363-368.
9. Altenhoff AM, Schneider A, Gonnet GH, Dessimoz C. 2011. OMA 2011. Orthology inference among 1000 complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D289-294.
10. Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, et al. 2009. EnsemblCompara GeneTrees. Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res 19: 327-35.
11. Huerta-Cepas J, Capella-Gutierrez S, Pryszcz LP, Denisov I, et al. 2011. PhylomeDB v3.0. An expanding repository of genome-wide collections of trees, alignments and phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D556-560.
12. Kristensen DM, Wolf YI, Mushegian AR, Koonin EV. 2011. Computational methods for Gene Orthology inference. Brief Bioinform, in press, DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr030.
13. Koonin EV. 2005. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet 39: 309-38.
14. Lang T, Alexandersson M, Hansson GC, Samuelsson T. 2007. Gel-forming mucins appeared early in metazoan evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16209-14.
15. Lang T, Alexandersson M, Hansson GC, Samuelsson T. 2004. Bioinformatic identification of polymerizing and transmembrane mucins in the puffer fish Fugu rubripes. Glycobiology 14: 521-7.
16. Gabaldon T. 2008. Large-scale assignment of orthology. Back to phylogenetics? Genome Biol 9: 235.
17. Kuzniar A, van Ham RC, Pongor S, Leunissen JA. 2008. The quest for orthologs: finding the corresponding gene across genomes. Trends Genet 24: 539-51.
18. Pryszcz LP, Huerta-Cepas J, Gabaldon T. 2010. MetaPhOrs. Orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e32.
19. Hulsen T, Huynen MA, de Vlieg J, Groenen PM. 2006. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data. Genome Biol 7: R31.
20. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Vermunt JK, Roos DS. 2007. Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS One 2: e383.
21. Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C. 2009. Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000262.
22. Goodstadt L, Ponting CP. 2006. Phylogenetic reconstruction of orthology, paralogy, and conserved synteny for dog and human. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e133.
23. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2005. The yeast gene order browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res 15: 1456-61.
24. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A. 2007. Automatic genome-wide reconstruction of phylogenetic gene trees. Bioinformatics 23: i549-58.
25. Akerborg O, Sennblad B, Arvestad L, Lagergren J. 2009. Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5714-9.
26. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2011. Evaluating ortholog prediction algorithms in a yeast model clade. PLoS One 6: e18755.
27. Jensen LJ, Julien P, Kuhn M, von Mering C, et al. 2008. eggNOG. automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D250-254.
28. Kriventseva EV, Rahman N, Espinosa O, Zdobnov EM. 2008. OrthoDB: the hierarchical catalog of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D271-5.
29. King N, Westbrook MJ, Young SL, Kuo A, et al. 2008. The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans. Nature 451: 783-8.
30. Rokas A. 2008. The origins of multicellularity and the early history of the genetic toolkit for animal development. Annu Rev Genet 42: 235-51.
31. Schneider A, Dessimoz C, Gonnet GH. 2007. OMA Browser-exploring orthologous relations across 352 complete genomes. Bioinformatics 23: 2180-2.
32. Funkhouser JD, Aronson, NN. Jr., 2007. Chitinase family GH18. Evolutionary insights from the genomic history of a diverse protein family. BMC Evol Biol 7: 96.
33. Muller J, Oma Y, Vallar L, Friederich E, et al. 2005. Sequence and comparative genomic analysis of actin-related proteins. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5736-48.
34. Thompson JD, Plewniak F, Ripp R, Thierry JC, et al. 2001. Towards a reliable objective function for multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 314: 937-51.
35. Doolittle RF. 1995. The origins and evolution of eukaryotic proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 349: 235-40.
36. Tordai H, Nagy A, Farkas K, Banyai L, et al. 2005. Modules, multidomain proteins and organismic complexity. FEBS J 272: 5064-78.
37. Copley RR, Letunic I, Bork P. 2002. Genome and protein evolution in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 6: 39-45.
38. Ciccarelli FD, von Mering C, Suyama M, Harrington ED, et al. 2005. Complex genomic rearrangements lead to novel primate gene function. Genome Res 15: 343-51.
39. Forslund K, Henricson A, Hollich V, Sonnhammer EL. 2008. Domain tree-based analysis of protein architecture evolution. Mol Biol Evol 25: 254-64.
40. Singh AH, Doerks T, Letunic I, Raes J, et al. 2009. Discovering functional novelty in metagenomes: examples from light-mediated processes. J Bacteriol 191: 32-41.
41. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. 2009. SMART 6. Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D229-232.
42. Milinkovitch MC, Helaers R, Depiereux E, Tzika AC, et al. 2010. 2x genomes-depth does matter. Genome Biol 11: R16.
43. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, et al. 2011. Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D800-806.
44. Thompson JD, Thierry JC, Poch O. 2003. RASCAL. Rapid scanning and correction of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 19: 1155-61.
45. Muller J, Creevey CJ, Thompson JD, Arendt D, et al. 2009. AQUA. Automated quality improvement for multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 26: 263-5.
46. Huynen MA, Bork P. 1998. Measuring genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5849-56.
47. Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, Kostler T, et al. 2010. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D196-203.
48. Deluca TF, Wu IH, Pu J, Monaghan T, et al. 2006. Roundup: a multi-genome repository of orthologs and evolutionary distances. Bioinformatics 22: 2044-6.
49. van der Heijden RT, Snel B, van Noort V, Huynen MA. 2007. Orthology prediction at scalable resolution by phylogenetic tree analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 83.
50. Putnam NH, Srivastava M, Hellsten U, Dirks B, et al. 2007. Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science 317: 86-94.
51. Chapman JA, Kirkness EF, Simakov O, Hampson SE, et al. 2010. The dynamic genome of Hydra. Nature 464: 592-6.
52. Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, Putnam NH, et al. 2008. The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 454: 955-60.
53. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, et al. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-10.
54. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-7.
55. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-8.
56. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17: 540-52.
57. Eddy SR. 2009. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform 23: 205-11.
58. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 59: 307-21.