Public values for energy system change

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 34, Issue , 2015, Pages 59-69

  Demski, Christina ^a   Butler, Catherine ^b   Parkhill, Karen A ^c   Spence, Alexa ^d   Pidgeon, Nick F ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Energy system transitions; Public acceptability; Public perception

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY RESOURCE; SUSTAINABILITY; VALUATION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84938569181     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adger W.N., Barnett J., Brown K., Marshall N., O'Brien, K Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3:112-117.
2. Barry B. Sustainability and intergenerational justice. Theoria 1997, 89:43-64.
3. Bickerstaff K., Lorenzoni I., Pidgeon N.F., Poortinga W., Simmons P. Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Underst. Sci. 2008, 17(2):145-169.
4. Boudet H., Clarke C., Bugden D., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. Fracking controversy and communication. Energy Policy 2014, 65:57-67.
5. Brown T.C. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 1984, 60(3):231-246.
6. Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. Qual. Res. 2006, 6(1):97-113.
7. Bulkeley H., Castan Broto V., Hodson N., Marvin S. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions 2013, Routledge, Oxon.
8. Butler C., Demski C. Valuing public engagement with energy system transitions: the importance of what lies beneath. Carbon Manag. 2013, 4(6):659-662.
9. Butler C., Parkhill K.A., Pidgeon N. Deliberating Energy Transitions in the UK-Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability 2013, UKERC, London.
10. Butler C., Demski C., Parkhill K., Pidgeon N., Spence A. Public values for energy futures: framing, indeterminacy and policy making. Energy Policy 2015, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.035.
11. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18.
12. Corner A.J., Markowitz E., Pidgeon N.F. Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2014, 5:411-422.
13. Crompton T. Values matter. Nat. Clim. Change 2011, 1:276-277.
14. Curran G. Contested energy futures: shaping renewable energy narratives in Australia. Glob. Environ. Change 2012, 22:236-244.
15. De Best-Waldhober M., Daamen D., Ramirez A.R., Faaij A., Hendriks C., de Visser E. Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4795-4802.
16. DECC 2050 Pathway Analysis 2010, UK Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
17. DECC The Carbon Plan 2011, UK Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
18. Demski C., Spence A., Pidgeon N. Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in August 2012-Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability 2013, UKERC, London.
19. Dietz T. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110(Suppl. 3):14081-14087.
20. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007, John Wiley, UK.
21. Douglas M. Risk and Blame 1992, Routledge, New York.
22. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers 1982, University of California Press, Berkeley.
23. Einseidel E.F., Boyd A.D., Medlock J., Ashworth P. Assessing socio-technical mindsets: public deliberation on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change. Energy Policy 2013, 53:149-158.
24. Ekins P., Keppo I., Skea J., Strachan N., Usher W., Anandarajah G. The UK Energy System in 2050: Comparing Low Carbon, Resilient Scenarios 2013, UKERC, London.
25. Fischer F. Technological deliberation in a democratic society: the case for participatory inquiry. Sci. Public Policy 1999, 26(5):294-302.
26. Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: is there anything in there?. The Origin of Values 1993, Walter de Gruyter, New York. M. Hechter, L. Nadel, R.E. Michod (Eds.).
27. Fleishman L., Bruine de Bruin W., Morgan M.G. Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies. Risk Anal. 2010, 30(9):1399-1410.
28. Hards S. Social Practice and the evolution of personal environmental values. Environ. Values 2011, 20:23-42.
29. Hechter M. Values research in the social and behavioural sciences. The Origin of Values 1993, Walter de Gruyter, New York. M. Hechter, L. Nadel, R.E. Michod (Eds.).
30. Hitlin S., Piliavin J.A. Values: reviving a dormant concept. Ann. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 30:359-393.
31. IEA, 2013. International Energy Agency Annual Report: World Energy Outlook 2013. (accessed 15.07.14.). http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/international-energy-agency-2013-annual-report.html.
32. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 2003, 41:223-244.
33. Jasanoff S., Kim S. Socio-technical imaginaries and national energy policies. Sci. Cult. 2013, 22(2):189-196.
34. Jasanoff S., Wynne B. Science and decision making. Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal Framework 1998, vol. 1. Battelle Press, Ohio.
35. Kearney M. World View 1984, Chandler & Sharp Publishers, Inc., Novato, CA.
36. C Kluckhohn Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration in definition and classification. Toward a General Theory of Action 1951, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. T. Parsons, E. Shils (Eds.).
37. Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. The Construction of Preference 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Macnaghten P. Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42:23-37.
39. Maio, G.R., 2010. Mental Representations of Social Values. Zanna M.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 42, 1-43.
40. Mason J. Qualitative interviewing: asking, listening, interpreting. Qualitative Research in Action 2002, Sage, London. T. May (Ed.).
41. Miller C. The dynamics of framing environmental values and policy: Four models of societal processes. Environ. Values 2000, 9:211-233.
42. Miller C.A., Iles A., Jones C.F. The social dimensions of energy transitions. Sci. Cult. 2013, 22(2):135-148.
43. Mohai P., Pellow D., Timmons-Roberts J. Environmental Justice. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34:405-430.
44. Moscovici A. The phenomenon of social representations. Social Representations 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. Farr, S. Mascovici (Eds.).
45. National Grid, 2014. UK Future Energy Scenarios. http://www2.nationalgrid.com/uk/industry-information/future-of-energy/future-energy-scenarios/.
46. Parkhill K.A., Demski C.C., Butler C., Spence A., Pidgeon N. Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability-Synthesis Report 2013, UKERC, London.
47. Pidgeon N., Demski C., Butler C., Parkhill K., Spence A. Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, 111(Suppl. 4):13606-13613.
48. Pidgeon N.F., Hood C., Jones D., Turner B., Gibson R. Risk Perception. Ch 5 of Risk-Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group 1992, 89-134. The Royal Society, London.
49. Pidgeon N.F., Lorenzoni I., Poortinga W. Climate change or nuclear power-no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Glob. Environ. Change 2008, 18(1):69-85.
50. Reser J.P., Bentrupperbäumer J.M. What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of environmental and 'world heritage' values. J. Environ. Psychol. 2005, 25:125-146.
51. Satterfield T. In search of value literacy: suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environ. Values 2001, 10(3):331-359.
52. Scheer D., Konrad W., Scheel O. Public evaluation of electricity technologies and future low-carbon portfolios in Germany and the USA. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2013, 3(8):1-13.
53. Schlosberg D. Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environ. Politics 2004, 13(3):517-540.
54. Schwarz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, Academic Press, Orlando. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
55. Shove E. Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. J. Consum. Pol. 2003, 26:395-418.
56. Spence A., Pidgeon N. Psychology, climate change and sustainable behaviour. Environ. Sci. Pol. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 51(6):8-18.
57. Spence A., Demski C., Butler C., Parkhill K., Pidgeon N.F. Public perceptions of demand-side management and a smarter energy future. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5:550-554.
58. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques 1990, Sage, London.
59. Thevenot L. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory 2001, 56-73. Routledge, London. K. Knorr-Cetina, T. Schatzki, V. Savigny Eike (Eds.).
60. UK Data Service Labour Force Survey Series 2006, UK Data Service, Colchester, UK.
61. Walker G., Cass N., Burningham K., Barnett J. Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42:931-947.
62. Whitmarsh L., Upham P., Poortinga W., McLachlan C., Darnton A., Devine-Wright P., Demski C., Sherry-Brennan F. Public Attitudes, Understanding, and Engagement in relation to Low-Carbon Energy: A Selective Review of Academic and Non-academic Literatures 2011, Research Councils UK, London.
63. WWF The Energy Report: 100% Renewable Energy by 2050 2011, WWF, London.
64. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identity and public uptake of science. Public Underst. Sci. 1992, 1:281-304.
65. Wynne B. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Risk Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology 1996, Sage, London. S. Lash, B. Szersynski, B. Wynne (Eds.).