Trade secret fair use

Fordham Law Review

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1401-1454

  Varadarajan, Deepa ^a  

^a ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938562129     PISSN: 0015704X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (252)

1. Wetherbee v. Green, 22 Mich. 311, 320 (1871)
2. Ploof v. Putnam, 71 A. 188, 189 (Vt. 1908).
3. JAMES POOLEY, TRADE SECRETS § 1.01, at 1-6 (2014).
4. David S. Levine, Secrecy and Unaccountability: Trade Secrets in Our Public Infrastructure, 59 FLA. L. REV. 135, 151-55 (2007)
5. Annemarie Bridy, Trade Secret Prices and High-Tech Devices: How Medical Device Manufacturers Are Seeking to Sustain Profits by Propertizing Prices, 17 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 187, 188 (2009)
6. Deepa Varadarajan, Improvement Doctrines, 21 GEO. MASON L. REV. 657 (2014).
7. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1 cmt. 2 (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 437, 438 (1990)
8. Pamela Samuelson & Suzanne Scotchmer, The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering, 111 YALE L.J. 1575, 1582 (2002).
9. Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use, 17 U.S.C. § 107 (2012)
10. 17 U.S.C. § 110.
11. 547 U.S. 388 (2006).
12. Maureen A. O'Rourke, Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law, 100 COLUM. L. REV. 1177, 1183 (2002).
13. ROBERT P. MERGES ET AL., INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE NEW TECHNOLOGICAL AGE 34, 35 (6th ed. 2012)
14. Adam Cohen, Securing Trade Secrets in the Information Age: Upgrading the Economic Espionage Act After United States v. Aleynikov, 30 YALE J. ON REG. 189, 192 (2013).
15. David S. Levine, What Can the Uniform Trade Secrets Act Learn from the Bayh-Dole Act?, 33 HAMLINE L. REV. 615 (2000)
16. Mary L. Lyndon, Secrecy and Access in an Innovation Intensive Economy: Reordering Information Privileges in Environmental, Health, and Safety Law, 78 U. COLO. L. REV. 465 (2007)
17. Frank Pasquale, The Troubling Consequences of Trade Secret Protection of Search Engine Rankings, in THE LAW AND THEORY OF TRADE SECRECY: A HANDBOOK OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH 381 (Rochelle C. Dreyfuss & Katherine J. Strandburg eds., 2011).
18. William Fisher, Theories of Intellectual Property, in NEW ESSAYS IN THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY 168 (Stephen R. Munzer ed., 2001)
19. Copyright Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 124
20. 17 U.S.C. §§ 101-1332 (2012)
21. Patent Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 109
22. 35 U.S.C. §§ 1-376 (2012).
23. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF TORTS § 757 cmt. b (1939).
24. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 433 (1990).
25. Trade Secrets Act, UNIF. L. COMM'N, http://www.uniformlaws.org/ Act.aspx?title=Trade+Secrets+Act (last visited Nov. 26, 2014)
26. Christopher B. Seaman, The Case Against Federalizing Trade Secrecy, 101 VA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2015) (manuscript at 33), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=2397567.
27. ROGER M. MILGRIM, MILGRIM ON TRADE SECRETS § 1.01[3] (2014).
28. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION §§ 39-45 (1995).
29. Eric R. Claeys, Private Law Theory and Corrective Justice in Trade Secrecy, 41 J. TORT L. 1, 4 (2011)
30. Metallurgical Indus. Inc. v. Fourtek, Inc., 790 F.2d 1195, 1201 (5th Cir. 1986).
31. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(4)(i) (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 438 (1990).
32. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1 cmt. 5, 14 U.L.A. 439.
33. Rockwell Graphic Sys., Inc. v. DEV Indus. Inc., 925 F.2d 174, 180 (7th Cir. 1991).
34. Metallurgical Indus. Inc., 790 F.2d at 1200.
35. 35 U.S.C. §§ 101-103, 112 (2012).
36. Jeanne C. Fromer, Patent Disclosure, 94 IOWA L. REV. 539, 560 (2009).
37. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(4)(i) (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 438 (1990).
38. Metallurgical Indus. Inc., 790 F.2d at 1202
39. SI Handling Sys., Inc. v. Heisley, 753 F.2d 1244, 1256 (3d Cir. 1985)
40. Schmidinger v. Welsh, 383 F.2d 455, 466 n.14 (3d Cir. 1967).
41. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1 cmt., 14 U.L.A. 439
42. Charles Tait Graves, The Law of Negative Knowledge: A Critique, 15 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 387, 389 (2007).
43. 35 U.S.C. § 101.
44. 98 Mass. 452 (1868).
45. Stewart E. Sterk, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Uncertainty About Property Rights, 106 MICH. L. REV. 1285, 1327-28 (2008).
46. 17 U.S.C. § 412 (2012).
47. 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)
48. Feist Publ'ns Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 346 (1991).
49. 35 U.S.C. § 271 (2012)
50. Clarissa Long, Information Costs in Patent and Copyright, 90 VA. L. REV. 465, 525-33 (2004).
51. 17 U.S.C. § 106.
52. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1 (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 437 (1990)
53. Michael Risch, Why Do We Have Trade Secrets?, 11 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 1, 12 (2007).
54. 35 U.S.C. § 154(a).
55. 17 U.S.C. § 302.
56. Andrew A. Schwartz, The Corporate Preference for Trade Secret, 74 OHIO ST. L.J. 623 (2013).
57. Richard A. Posner, Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property, 4 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 325, 328 (2005).
58. U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8
59. WILLIAM M. LANDES & RICHARD A. POSNER, THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 74-76 (2003).
60. Rebecca Tushnet, Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It, 114 YALE L.J. 535, 538 (2004)
61. Edward Lee, Technological Fair Use, 83 S. CAL. L. REV. 797, 813 (2010).
62. Mark A. Lemley, The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law, 75 TEX. L. REV. 989, 991 (1997).
63. Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-298, 112 Stat. 2827 (codified as amended at 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, 108, 203, 301-304 (2012)).
64. Michael A. Carrier, Cabining Intellectual Property Through a Property Paradigm, 54 DUKE L.J. 1, 5 (2004)
65. David Fagundes, Efficient Copyright Infringement, 98 IOWA L. REV. 1791, 1800 (2013).
66. Mark A. Lemley, The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets As IP Rights, 61 STAN. L. REV. 311, 312-14 (2008).
67. Sharon K. Sandeen, The Cinderella of Intellectual Property Law, in 2 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INFORMATION WEALTH: ISSUES AND PRACTICES IN THE DIGITAL AGE 399 (Peter K. Yu ed., 2007).
68. Vincent Chiappetta, Myth, Chameleon, or Intellectual Property Olympian? A Normative Framework Supporting Trade Secret Law, 8 GEO. MASON L. REV. 69 (1999).
69. Todd M. Sloan, Trade Secrets: Real Toads in a Conceptual Garden, 1 W. ST. U. L. REV. 113 (1973).
70. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 481 (1974)
71. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Christopher, 431 F.2d 1012, 1015 (5th Cir. 1970)
72. Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 314 S.W.2d 763, 773 (Tex. 1958).
73. Catherine L. Fisk, Working Knowledge: Trade Secrets, Restrictive Covenants in Employment, and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 1800-1920, 52 HASTINGS L.J. 441, 446 (2001).
74. 244 U.S. 100 (1917).
75. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF TORTS § 757 cmt. a (1939).
76. Pamela Samuelson, Information As Property: Do Ruckelshaus and Carpenter Signal a Changing Direction in Intellectual Property Law?, 38 CATH. U. L. REV. 365, 366 (1989)
77. C. Owen Paepke, An Economic Interpretation of the Misappropriation Doctrine: Common Law Protection for Investments in Innovation, 2 HIGH TECH. L.J. 55, 56, 59 (1987) .
78. Miguel Deutch, The Property Concept of Trade Secrets in Anglo-American Law: An Ongoing Debate, 31 U. RICH. L. REV. 313 (1997)
79. Robert G. Bone, A New Look at Trade Secret Law: A Doctrine in Search of Justification, 86 CAL. L. REV. 241, 243 (1998).
80. Van Prods. Co. v. Gen. Welding & Fabricating Co., 213 A.2d 769, 780 (Pa. 1965).
81. Peabody v. Norfolk, 98 Mass. 452 (1868)
82. 467 U.S. 986 (1984)
83. Monsanto, 467 U.S. at 998-1004.
84. Lynn C. Tyler, Trade Secrets in Indiana: Property vs. Relationship, 31 IND. L. REV. 339, 339 (1998).
85. Garrett Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 SCI. 1243, 1244 (1968).
86. Henry E. Smith, Intellectual Property As Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information, 116 YALE L.J. 1742, 1756-57 (2007).
87. Peter Lee, The Accession Insight and Patent Infringement Remedies, 110 MICH. L. REV. 175, 193 (2011)
88. Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, The New Servitudes, 96 GEO. L.J. 885, 906 (2008).
89. ROBERT P. MERGES, JUSTIFYING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (2011).
90. Pamela Samuelson, Privacy As Intellectual Property?, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1125, 1153 & n.148 (2000)
91. Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257, 266 (1979)
92. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 485 (1974)
93. Rockwell Graphic Sys., Inc. v. DEV Indus., Inc., 925 F.2d 174, 180 (7th Cir. 1991)
94. DVD Copy Control Ass'n v. Bunner, 75 P.3d 1, 13 (Cal. 2003)
95. Andrew Beckerman-Rodau, Prior Restraints and Intellectual Property: The Clash Between Intellectual Property and the First Amendment from an Economic Perspective, 12 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1, 60 (2001)
96. Richard A. Epstein, The Constitutional Protection of Trade Secrets Under the Takings Clause, 71 U. CHI. L. REV. 57, 58 (2004)
97. 416 U.S. 470, 484 (1974).
98. Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593, 651 (2010)
99. Dan L. Burk & Mark A. Lemley, Policy Levers in Patent Law, 89 VA. L. REV. 1575, 1618 (2003))).
100. Robert G. Bone, The (Still) Shaky Foundations of Trade Secret Law, 92 TEX. L. REV. 1803, 1807-10 (2014).
101. 35 U.S.C. § 112 (2012).
102. Rockwell Graphic Sys., Inc. v. DEV Indus., 925 F.2d 174, 177 (7th Cir. 1991).
103. 35 U.S.C. § 282 (2012).
104. Pamela Samuelson, Principles for Resolving Conflicts Between Trade Secrets and the First Amendment, 58 HASTINGS L.J. 777 (2007).
105. Mark A. Lemley & Eugene Volokh, Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases, 48 DUKE L.J. 147, 165 (1998).
106. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17, 29-30 (1997).
107. John R. Allison & Mark A. Lemley, The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents, 59 STAN. L. REV. 955, 959-60 (2007)
108. Robert P. Merges & Richard R. Nelson, On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 90 COLUM. L. REV. 839, 844 & n.21 (1990)
109. 35 U.S.C. § 282 (2012).
110. Robert Merges, Intellectual Property Rights and Bargaining Breakdown: The Case of Blocking Patents, 62 TENN. L. REV. 75, 84-91 (1994).
111. Katherine Strandburg, Patent Fair Use 2.0, 1 U.C. IRVINE L. REV. 265, 289 (2011).
112. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608-09 (1950).
113. 170 U.S. 537 (1898).
114. Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Res., Inc., 279 F.3d 1357, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
115. 567 F.3d 1314, 1338-39 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
116. 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) (2012).
117. Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 § 202, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-302 (2012).
118. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193, 206-08 (2005)
119. Momenta Pharm., Inc. v. Amphastar Pharm., Inc., 686 F.3d 1348, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012) .
120. Madey v. Duke Univ., 307 F.3d 1351, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
121. Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use, 56 U. CHI. L. REV. 1017, 1018 (1989).
122. Gideon Parchomovsky & Alex Stein, Intellectual Property Defenses, 113 COLUM. L. REV. 1483, 1500-01 (2013).
123. Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1089, 1105 (1972).
124. eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006).
125. z4 Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 434 F. Supp. 2d 437 (E.D. Tex. 2006).
126. eBay, 547 U.S. at 395-97.
127. eBay, 547 U.S. at 396.
128. John M. Golden, "Patent Trolls" and Patent Remedies, 85 TEX. L. REV. 2111, 2113 (2007)
129. Mark A. Lemley & Philip J. Weiser, Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information?, 85 TEX. L. REV. 783, 800 (2007).
130. Arnstein v. Porter, 154 F.2d 464, 468 (2d Cir. 1946).
131. Bright Tunes Music Corp. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd., 420 F. Supp. 177, 181 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
132. Mark A. Lemley, What's Different About Intellectual Property, 83 TEX. L. REV. 1097, 1116 (2005).
133. 17 U.S.C. § 102(b) (2012).
134. Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99, 104-05 (1879).
135. 17 U.S.C. § 110(1), (4), (8).
136. Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 475 (1984)
137. Dellar v. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., 104 F.2d 661, 662 (2d Cir. 1939).
138. Barton Beebe, An Empirical Study of U.S. Copyright Fair Use Opinions, 1978-2005, 156 U. PA. L. REV. 551, 551 (2008).
139. Gideon Parchomovsky & Kevin A. Goldman, Fair Use Harbors, 93 VA. L. REV. 1483, 1495 (2007).
140. 17 U.S.C. § 107.
141. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539, 566-67 (1985).
142. 17 U.S.C. § 101.
143. Harper & Row, 471 U.S. at 566-67.
144. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994).
145. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539, 560 (1985)
146. Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186, 221 (2003)
147. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp. 2d 896, 922 (N.D. Cal. 2000)
148. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. v. Comline Bus. Data, Inc., 166 F.3d 65, 74 (2d Cir. 1999).
149. Jed Rubenfeld, The Freedom of Imagination: Copyright's Constitutionality, 112 YALE L.J. 1 (2002).
150. Wendy J. Gordon, Fair Use As Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors, 82 COLUM. L. REV. 1600, 1614 (1982).
151. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
152. 464 U.S. 417, 456 (1984).
153. Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257, 1269-71 (11th Cir. 2001).
154. Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., 954 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).
155. Alex Kozinski & Christopher Newman, What's So Fair About Fair Use?, 46 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y 513, 525-27 (1999)
156. Orit Fischman Afori, Flexible Remedies As a Means to Counteract Failures in Copyright Law, 29 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 1, 3 (2011).
157. 17 U.S.C. §§ 502, 504 (2012).
158. Lemley & Weiser, supra note 156, at 791.
159. Jiarui Liu, Copyright Injunctions After eBay: An Empirical Study, 16 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 215, 218 (2012).
160. Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68, 77 (2d Cir. 2010).
161. N.Y. Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001).
162. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 578 n.10 (1994).
163. 17 U.S.C. § 118 (2012)
164. UTSA § 1.
165. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(2) (amended 1985)
166. 14 U.L.A. 437 (1990).
167. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher, 431 F.2d 1012, 1016 (5th Cir. 1970)
168. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF TORTS § 757, cmt. f, at 10 (1939).
169. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(2)(ii)(C), 14 U.L.A. 437.
170. Penalty Kick Mgmt. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co., 318 F.3d 1284, 1293 (11th Cir. 2003).
171. Stomback v. New Line Cinema, 384 F.3d 283, 305-06 (6th Cir. 2004)
172. Am. Can Co. v. Mansukhani, 742 F.2d 314, 329 (7th Cir. 1984)
173. Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays Int'l, Inc., 739 F.2d 1149, 1157 (7th Cir. 1984).
174. POOLEY, supra note 4, § 6.03[4], at 6-33
175. N. Petrochemical Co. v. Tomlinson, 484 F.2d 1057, 1059 n.2. (7th Cir. 1973).
176. Mangren Research & Dev. Co. v. Nat'l Chem. Co., 87 F.3d 937, 944 (7th Cir. 1996).
177. Rhone-Poulenc Agro v. DeKalb Genetics Corp., 272 F.3d 1335, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
178. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1 cmt. 2 (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 437, 438 (1990).
179. 489 U.S. 141 (1989).
180. Chi. Lock Co. v. Fanberg, 676 F.2d 400, 405 (9th Cir. 1981).
181. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION § 40 cmt. c (1995).
182. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A (2012)
183. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8) (2012).
184. Merckle GmbH v. Johnson & Johnson, 961 F. Supp. 721, 735 (D.N.J. 1997) .
185. Martin H. Redish, The Proper Role of the Prior Restraint Doctrine in First Amendment Theory, 70 VA. L. REV. 53 (1984).
186. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376, 390 (1973).
187. CBS Inc. v. Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994)
188. DVD Copy Control Assoc. v. Bunner, 75 P.3d 1, 15-17 (Cal. 2003)
189. Cent. Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of N.Y., 447 U.S. 557, 562-63 (1980).
190. Richard A. Epstein, Privacy, Publication and the First Amendment: The Dangers of First Amendment Exceptionalism, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1003, 1037 (2000).
191. William Lynch Schaller, Secrets of the Trade: Tactical and Legal Considerations from the Trade Secret Plaintiff's Perspective, 29 REV. LITIG. 729, 807 (2010)
192. FMC Corp. v. Taiwan Tainan Giant Indus. Co., 730 F.2d 61, 63 (2d Cir. 1984).
193. Pub. L. No. 104-294, 110 Stat. 3488
194. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1839 (2012).
195. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 2(b) (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 437, 449 (1990).
196. Gen. Electric Co. v. Sung, 843 F. Supp. 776, 780 (D. Mass. 1994)
197. ILG Indus. Inc. v. Scott, 273 N.E.2d 393, 396-97 (Ill. 1971).
198. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 894 F. Supp. 2d 691, 706-07 (E.D. Va. 2012)
199. Ferrero v. Associated Materials Inc., 923 F.2d 1441, 1448 (11th Cir. 1991).
200. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 894 F. Supp. 2d at 707.
201. 559 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2009).
202. Winston Research Corp. v. Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co., 350 F.2d 134, 142 (9th Cir. 1965)
203. Daniel Laster, The Secret Is Out: Patent Law Preempts Mass Market License Terms Barring Reverse Engineering for Interoperability Purposes, 58 BAYLOR L. REV. 621, 642 (2006).
204. Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1988 (DMCA). Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860
205. Derek E. Bambauer & Oliver Day, The Hacker's Aegis, 60 EMORY L.J. 1051, 1077 (2011).
206. Margaret Witherup Tindall, Breast Implant Information As Trade Secrets: Another Look at FOIA's Fourth Exemption, 7 ADMIN. L.J. AM. U. 213, 224 (1993)
207. Anderson v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 907 F.2d 936, 939-40 (10th Cir. 1990).
208. Harlan M. Krumholz, Give the Data to the People, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 3, 2014, at A23.
209. Paul M. Barrett, A Second Chemical Spilled in West Virginia, and the Company Said Nothing Until Now, BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK (Jan. 23, 2014), http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-23/a-second-toxic-chemical-spilled-in-westvirginia-and-freedom-industries-said-nothing-until-now.
210. Ken Ward Jr., Second Chemical Information "Very Limited," CHARLESTON GAZETTE, Jan. 22, 2014, at A1.
211. N.C. GEN. STAT. §§ 163-165.9A(a) (2005).
212. James Grimmelmann, The Structure of Search Engine Law, 93 IOWA L. REV. 1 (2007).
213. Oren Bracha & Frank Pasquale, Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness, and Accountability in the Law of Search, 93 CORNELL L. REV. 1149, 1151 (2008).
214. 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2006), amended by OPEN Government Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-175, 121 Stat. 2524
215. Elizabeth A. Rowe, Striking a Balance: When Should Trade-Secret Law Shield Disclosures to the Government?, 96 IOWA L. REV. 791, 804-08 (2011).
216. Burt A. Braverman & Wesley R. Heppler, A Practical Review of State Open Records Laws, 49 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 720 (1981)
217. Andrea G. Nadel, Annotation, What Constitutes "Trade Secrets" Exempt from Disclosure Under State Freedom of Information Act, 27 A.L.R. 4th 773 (1984).
218. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)-(4).
219. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)
220. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 318 (1979)
221. Reliance Electric Co. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 924 F.2d 274, 277 (D.C. Cir. 1991).
222. United States Department of Justice Guide to the Freedom of Information Act, U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE, available at http://www.justice.gov/oip/doj-guidefreedom-information-act-0.
223. Thomas O. McGarity & Sidney A. Shapiro, The Trade Secret Status of Health and Safety Testing Information: Reforming Agency Disclosure Policies, 93 HARV. L. REV. 837, 838 (1980).
224. 21 C.F.R. § 20.20 (2010).
225. CBS Inc. v. Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1318 (1994)
226. Ford Motor Co. v. Lane, 67 F. Supp. 2d 745, 753 (E.D. Mich. 1999)
227. UNIF. TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(2)(ii)(B) (amended 1985), 14 U.L.A. 438 (1990).
228. Promoting American Trade Secrets Act of 2012, S. 3389, 112th Cong. (2012)
229. Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2014, S. 2667, 113th Cong. (2014).
230. Lydia Pallas Loren, Redefining the Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission Systems, 5 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 1, 13-22 (1997).
231. Progress Laundry Co. v. Hamilton, 270 S.W. 834, 836-37 (Ky. App. 1925)
232. In re Bolster, 110 P. 547, 548 (Wash. 1919)
233. Tailored Lighting, Inc. v. Osram Sylvania Prods., Inc., 236 F.R.D. 146, 148 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)
234. Uniroyal Chem. Co. v. Syngenta Crop Prot., 224 F.R.D. 53, 57 (D. Conn. 2004)
235. Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. Sundstand Data Control, Inc., 682 F. Supp. 20, 22 (D. Del. 1988).
236. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 586 (1994)
237. Feist Publ'ns v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 364 (1991).
238. Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966).
239. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 591-93 (1994).
240. Robert P. Merges, Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual Property, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 2655, 2659-60 (1994).
241. eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 393-94 (2006).
242. John E. Calfee & Richard Craswell, Some Effects of Uncertainty on Compliance with Legal Standards, 70 VA. L. REV. 965, 995 (1984).
243. 35 U.S.C. § 112 (2012)
244. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 494 (1974).
245. Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011).
246. 35 U.S.C. § 273(a)(2).
247. Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289, 1304-05 (2012).
248. eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006).
249. Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 DUKE L.J. 557, 569 (1992)
250. Cass R. Sunstein, Problems with Rules, 83 CAL. L. REV. 953, 963-64 (1995).
251. Ian Ayres & Eric Talley, Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade, 104 YALE L.J. 1027, 1039-47 (1995)
252. Ian Ayres & Paul Klemperer, Limiting Patentees' Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies, 97 MICH. L. REV. 985, 988 (1999).